Summary and Conclusions. Discuss your general reactions to the internship--good and bad points. Provide suggestions (if any) for improvement of the internship experience in general and with this company. Ideas include what divisions of the company that you would have liked to have learned more about during your internship. We strongly suggest that you discuss your suggestions with your supervisor prior to writing them up. What aspects of this industry attract or discourage you from a career track in that sector of the industry. What suggestions do you have for fellow students about to begin an internship with this industry and/or firm?
Summary and Conclusions. Within the context of re-employment preference, please check the appropriate category for this evaluation: □ Satisfactory □ Less than satisfactory (no impact on re-employment preference) □ Unsatisfactory Xxxx’x Signature: Faculty Signature: Date: Date: Faculty signature indicates only that this form has been reviewed, and does not indicate agreement with its contents. Pursuant to Education Code Section 87031, faculty have the right to respond in writing to any component of the evaluation summary and to have his/her response included in his/her personnel file. Faculty will have at most 30 days from the receipt of all of the evaluation materials (including the completed student evaluation forms) to submit the response to the xxxx and/or Human Resources. Appendix O (continued) Ohlone College In-Person Classroom Observation Reporting Form Xxxxxxx Xxxx: Observer: Class Observed: Date of Observation: Total Observation Time (Minimum 45 minutes):
Summary and Conclusions. Presents a summary of the results of the HHRA. • Section 9 - References: Provides a list of references cited in the text.
Summary and Conclusions. The HHRA was conducted to evaluate risks to human health at 17 of the 19 parcels that comprise the NRP. Four parcels (9, 10, 11, and 16) were not included because: (1) concentrations of VOCs in groundwater beneath these areas were detected below regulatory criteria, and (2) hazardous materials or wastes at the four parcels, if present, do not appear to have impacted the environment (Xxxxxxx ESE, 200lc). The HHRA evaluated potential health risks to indoor workers, construction workers, adult residents, child residents, and a default 30 year resident (6 years child and 24 years adult). Only the default 30-year residential receptor had multiple xxxxx for which the estimated excess lifetime cancer risks were above lxl0-4. For the other receptors, the lifetime excess risks were mostly within the USEPA risk management range. RME and CTE HIs for the construction worker were greater than 1 for numerous xxxxx, based upon the groundwater volatilization model results. Appropriate use of personnel protective equipment, enforcement of applicable institutional controls, and use of soil TCLs should be sufficient to reduce exposures to acceptable levels. In general, the lifetime excess cancer risks and HIs were highest for xxxxx and buildings within, or just adjacent to, parcel 15. The results of the HHRA are summarized as follows: • Maximum RME lifetime excess cancer risk for construction workers was within the USEPA risk management range (lx 10-6 to lx 10-4) based upon the groundwater volatilization modeling and direct air measurement results. The maximum estimated RME and CTE HIs for the construction worker, based upon the groundwater volatilization modeling and direct air measurements were greater than 1. This is primarily due to direct exposure to the contaminated groundwater. • RME lifetime excess cancer risks for indoor workers, estimated from the groundwater volatilization model, were within or below the risk management range, except for one wen in parcel 15 (W9-35). RME lifetime excess cancer risk estimated from the air measurements was above the risk mJlnagement range (2.3E-4) for four buildings (Building 156, 566, 6 and Hangar 1), but within the risk management range for the remaining buildings. However, lifetime estimated excess cancer risks estimated from xxxxx near Buildings 156 and 566 were an in the lower end of the risk management range. This high estimated lifetime excess cancer risk for Buildings 156 and 566 may due to sources other than contaminated gr...
Summary and Conclusions. We have introduced a RESTful semantic web service that allows indexing and invoking SCs on Ethereum BC via a URI. We extended the EthOn combined with the OWL-S ontology to support Ethereum SCs deployed in the Ethereum blockchain framework. As a result, semantic queries over SCs such as ”finding a SC with the minimal gas payment” can be executed using the existing semantic web platform. We have taken an initial step in connecting SCs with Linked Data. The validation of the framework is under investigation. A system for the demonstration of the proposed SSC has being developed and deployed in our testbeds which offers the dynamism needed to set up experiments and harvest data streaming needed for analyzing the outcomes of our proposed framework. As a part of our SMESEC project, this system will be used to verify and validate our SSC proposal. In the future, performance evaluation along with comparisons between our proposal and other approaches for SCs indexing will be carried out. Moreover, we intend to extend this work to other BC platforms, besides Ethereum, such as Hyperledger Fabric. For this purpose, we plan to migrate the testbed toward the Docker Swarm scheduling tool in cluster computing environments, which increases the simulation scalability of several order of magnitude nodes. Other future works include the usage of the process of semantification, linked data capabilities, on the current distributed ledgers. An important feature of the proposal resides on the logic-based explanation of discovery outcomes, obtained through non-standard inference for match- making among requests and resources. Acknowledgment This research was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programmes under grant agreement No 740787, the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) and the Insti- tute for Information Communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT).[2018-0- 00261, GDPR Compliant Personally Identifiable Information Management Technology for IoT Environment]. References [1] X. Xxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxxx, “Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: trick or treat?” in Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL). epubli, 2017, pp. 3–18. [2] X. Xxxx, “An agri-food supply chain traceability system for china based on rfid & blockchain technology,” in 2016 13th international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM). IEEE, 2016, p...
Summary and Conclusions. 13.1 The proposal presented as part of this application for planning permission have been developed over a long period of time with the principle of residential development on this site having been agreed through the adoption of Core Strategy Policy CSD8, as part of a broad location for development. There have been a number of opportunities for the public/stakeholder engagement throughout the pre-application development period.
Summary and Conclusions. A high-resolution (with a model grid resolution of 100 m for the hydrodynamic model), integrated hydrology-hydrodynamic model of the Barataria Basin has been developed to simulate the local hydrological cycle over the surrounding drainage basin and hydrodynamics within the basin. In order to explicit account for runoff from the surrounding drainage basin, 64 known streams and 522 unknown streams were identified. Each stream is assigned its own drainage subbasin and each drainage subbasin is classified into one of the eight drainage types with its distinct persistence time. Runoff characteristic for each subbasin is determined by the shape of the unit hydrograph selected for this basin to mimic typical runoff. Runoff from the hydrology model is fed into the depth-integrated hydrodynamic model via all the streams specified within the model domain. Detailed simulation of runoff from the surrounding drainage basins has never been done previously in the Barataria Basin. The hydrodynamic model (Park 2002) is based on the model formulation of Xxxxx et al. (2001) with much higher grid resolution than the one used by Park (1998) (also see Xxxxx et al. (1998)). The integrated model is forced by observed tides coming from the Gulf of Mexico, local wind, rainfall and evaporation over the model domain, salinity and temperature estimated at the open boundary located offshore of the mouth of the bay. Estimated local precipitation and evaporation over the model domain based on actual meteorological observations provide hydrological forcing to the hydrological model, that in turn simulates local runoff into the hydrodynamic model. A novel feature of the hydrodynamic model is its use of a very accurate advection scheme, thus, enabling accurate simulation of salinity variations in response to changes in various hydrological forcing functions. A flood event that took place during the tropical xxxxx Xxxxxxx in June 2001 resulted in significant sea-level changes especially in the Figure 1-15. Cross correlations between observed and simulated sea-level heights with rainfall at three stations during Xxxxxxx. upstream region of the basin. The integrated model appears to be able to capture a significant portion of the observed sea-level variations during the flood, providing confidence in the integration of the hydrology model and the hydrodynamic model, at least in terms of mass flux between the hydrology and hydrodynamic models. The next step in the model testing and verification...
Summary and Conclusions. A high-resolution (O (100m)), integrated hydrology-hydrodynamic model of the Barataria Basin has been developed to simulate explicitly local hydrological cycle over the surrounding drainage basin and hydrodynamics within the basin in response to hydrological, tidal and wind forcing. A flood event due to the tropical xxxxx Xxxxxxx in June 2001 provided a rare opportunity to test the model. In the previous chapter, it was shown that the integrated model appears to be able to capture a significant portion of the observed sea-level variations during the flood. p Figure. 2-20. Simulated salinity differences ( pt) between without and with Davis Pond Figure. 2-20. Simulated salinity differences (ppt) between with and without Davis Pond diversion at 5-day intervals. In this chapter, the integrated model was used to simulate a typical dry summer condition, namely the 30-day period during the summer of 1999. Despite the relatively crude salinity initial condition used (based on only eight observations), the model appears to do reasonable job of simulating time evolution of salinity fields inside the bay. The model was also used to simulate potential impact of freshwater diversions at Xxxxx, West Pointe à la Hache and at Davis Pond. Those simulation runs suggest that even at reasonable diversion rates, notable impacts on water level and salinity should be observable in the multiply connected channels through the xxxxx in the vicinity of operating diversion structures within several days of freshwater release, and after 15 days or so even in the downstream regions of the basin. The largest impact of diversions should be felt in the mid-bay region where the ambient salinity gradients are the steepest. It is notable that the speed associated with the propagation of diversion signal is much faster than the diffusion time-scale suggested for mixing of two water masses in an estuary (e. g., Xxxxxx and Xxxx, 1976). Rather it appears that the signal of diversion propagates at shallow-water wave speed, like a tidal bore, due to its mass flux, consequently impacting depth-integrated salinity values downstream. It is interesting to note that even after day 30, some isolated areas within the bay still remain without noticeable influence of the diversion. Those observations highlight the need to use high model resolution, sufficiently high enough to resolve many of the important complex morphological features of the basin in order to achieve reasonable simulation capability of sa...
Summary and Conclusions. This survey shows that voluntary agreement programs that are completely voluntary have less government pressure for participation, along with fewer incentives and no penalties. As a result, most programs that fall within this category show lower participation rates and weaker results. In contrast, programs that threatened to or did implement regulations or taxes often included additional incentives such as the ability to participate in emissions trading, relief from additional regulations or exemption from existing regulations, and reduced or avoided energy or GHG taxes. Some of these programs also included penalties such as a fee, more stringent environmental permitting requirements, increased regulations, and energy or GHG taxes for those companies that failed to meet their targets. As a result of this combination of incentives and penalties, these programs had higher participation rates and generally were more successful at meeting their energy or GHG emissions reduction goals. It is interesting to note that a number of countries that first established strictly voluntary agreements have strengthened their programs in a second or follow-on phase. In France, for example, the completely voluntary program enacted in 1996 was replaced in 2002 with a program that includes a penalty fee for non-compliance and allows for emissions trading (Nollet, n.d.). Similarly, the voluntary Canadian program evolved into a new program for the larger CO2 emitters that also has a penalty fee, allows for emissions trading, and includes financial support from the government for investments in wind energy, audit programs, benchmarking, and CO2 capture and storage (NRCan, 2004). Ireland’s voluntary program of the 1990s has been replaced by a program that includes a CO2 tax (Brabazon et al., 2003). Other countries that have a second generation of agreements, including Finland, Germany, The Netherlands, and New Zealand, all either increased the number of incentives or added penalties to strengthen the programs. Overall, evaluations of experience with voluntary agreements show that results have been varied, with some programs appearing to just achieve business-as-usual savings (Chidiak, 2002; OECD, 2002) or to have weak targets (Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxx, 2000). However, the more successful programs have seen significant energy savings (Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxx, 2002), even doubling historical autonomous energy efficiency improvement rates (Xxxxxxxxxx et al., 2002) and can be cost-effectiv...
Summary and Conclusions. 28 6.0 SIGNATURE PAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
