The Framework Sample Clauses

The Framework. The Framework Agreement is for the provision of an Mini Bus and Coach Hire with Driver Services and has been awarded in RANKING ORDER to the following Providers: LOT 1 MINI BUS HIRE WITH DRIVER WITH CAPACITY OF UP TO 22 PASSENGERS RANK PROVIDER 1 YMS Travel Limited (Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx) 2 The Kings Ferry (Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx) 3 Grange Travel Coach Hire Ltd (Gravesend, Kent) 4 ASD Coaches (Strood, Kent) 5 Regents Coaches (Xxxxxxxxxxx, Kent) LOT 2a COACH HIRE WITH DRIVER WITH CAPACITY OF UP TO 36 PASSENGERS RANK PROVIDER 1 Grange Travel Coach Hire Ltd (Gravesend, Kent) 2 The Kings Ferry (Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx) 3 Regents Coaches (Xxxxxxxxxxx, Kent) 4 ASD Coaches (Strood, Kent) 5 Scotland & Xxxxx Ltd (Xxxxxxx, Xxxx) LOT 2b COACH HIRE WITH DRIVER WITH CAPACITY OF UP TO 60 PASSENGERS RANK PROVIDER 2 The Kings Ferry (Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx) 3 Regents Coaches (Xxxxxxxxxxx, Kent) 4 Scotland & Xxxxx Ltd (Xxxxxxx, Xxxx) 5 Xxxxxxxx Coaches Ltd (Folkstone, Kent) LOT 3 AIRPORT ARRIVALS TRANSFER SERVICE WITH DRIVER AND CAPACITY OF UP TO 60 PASSENGERS AND LUGGAGE. RANK PROVIDER 1 Grange Travel Coach Hire Ltd (Gravesend, Kent) 2 Regents Coaches (Xxxxxxxxxxx, Kent) 3 The Kings Ferry (Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx) 4 Scotland & Xxxxx Ltd (Xxxxxxx, Xxxx) LOT 4 WEEKEND COACH HIRE WITH DRIVER WITH CAPACITY OF UP TO 60 PASSENGERS RANK PROVIDER 1 The Kings Ferry (Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx) 2 Xxxxxxxx Coaches Ltd (Folkstone, Kent) 3 Grange Travel Coach Hire Ltd (Gravesend, Kent) Users MUST use the Provider in order of Rank for the relevant Lot starting at Rank No 1.
Sample 1Sample 2
The Framework. The main objective of SHARE is to provide a community-based living seismic hazard model for the Euro-Mediterranean region and to provide a sustainable mechanism for future updates as new scientific sound methods and data are available. The project aims to establish new standards in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA) practice by a close cooperation of leading European seismologists and engineers. In particular, the project employs state-of-the art Information Technology (IT) to disseminate the data and results to expert and interested non-expert users such as the media and general public. Access to data and results will be granted to the public and specialist through a single entry point, the SHARE Portal via the project web-page at: xxx.xxxxx-xx.xxx. SHARE ensures full technical compatibility with the portal technology adopted for other portals in the seismological community. In cooperation with the European-Mediterranean Seismologcial Centre (EMSC) and the foundation for Observatories and Research Facilities for European Seismology (ORFEUS), we ensure not only compatibility in terms of portlets consumable in the different portals, but also in terms of the data services it is based on. SHARE designs its service infrastructure as a comprehensive and homogeneous access point to European seismic hazard data that will be further enhanced within the FP7-funded project “Network of European Research Infrastructures for Earthquake Risk Assessment and Mitigation “ (NERA) to serve the expert seismological, engineering seismology and engineering community as well as non-expert communities. SHARE started to design a facility for hazard and risk assessment as the European component of the Global Earthquake Model Foundation (GEM) and will in cooperation with NERA cooperatively ensure the implementation of the European Facility for Hazard and Risk (EFEHR) as primary access to hazard and risk data and results in Europe. This document describes the design of the architecture that works behind the scenes of the portal GUI and allows interactive as well as script-based data access: the web services. We outline the technical and non-technical requirements, the implementation strategy and defines remaining tasks.
Sample 1
The Framework. The Smart Grid Framework for interoperability and cybersecurity is technology agnostic, so as to address as many technological scenarios and environments as possible. The methodology is designed to provide guidance to ease risk management consistent with an organization’s approach to cybersecurity, and tries to integrate both privacy and cybersecurity concepts. The Framework complements the organization’s risk management strategy; it does not substitute it at all. Its main components are the following: - The Framework Core, which is composed of five concurrent Functions: identify (understanding business context, critical functions and associated resources and cybersecurity risks), protect (limiting an eventual cybersecurity event), detect (developing the necessary activities to identify the occurrence of a security event), respond (developing the necessary activities to take actions as a result of the detection of a cybersecurity event) and recover (developing the necessary activities to resume normal operation after the occurrence of a security event, trying to reduce its negative impact). Taken as a whole, these five functions provide a strategic view of the lifecycle of an organization’s management of cybersecurity risk. It also defines key Categories and Subcategories for each function, and matches each of them with the corresponding standards, guidelines and practices, which constitute the Informative References. - The Framework implementation Tiers: the Tiers characterize an organization’s practices over a range, starting from “Partial” (Tier 1) to “Adaptive” (Tier 4), and reflecting a progression from informal responses to approaches that are risk-informed. There are 4 Tiers: Partial (in this stage, cybersecurity risk management practices are not formalized, and risk is managed on an ad hoc and reactive basis), Risk informed (in this stage, risk management practices are approved by management but may not be established as organizational-wide policy), Repeatable (in this stage, the organization’s risk management practices are formally approved and expressed as policy) and Adaptive (in this case, the organization adapts its cybersecurity practices based on its experience and adopts predictive indicators derived from previous and current cybersecurity activities). - A Framework Profile: a Profile represents the outcomes based on business needs that an organization has selected from the Framework Categories and Subcategories, and it can be described by ...
Sample 1
The Framework. 5.1 There are circumstances where it is not possible for a Care Leaver to be placed in supported accommodation using the block provision. Firstly, as an Inner London local authority, there is limited capacity for placements located in the borough. In addition, there could be safeguarding issues preventing a young person from remaining in the borough, or if a young person was placed in care outside of the borough, they may wish to remain in that area after leaving care.
Sample 1
The Framework. The Government of Ukraine and the UNDaPre in mutual agreement to the content of this document and their responsibilities in the implementation of the country programme. Furthering their mutual agreement and cooperation for the realization of the Millennium Development Goals and the United Nations Conventions and Summits to which the Government of Ukraine and UNDP are committed, including:
Sample 1
The Framework. All the components of the kernel-space IRATI stack rely on a base framework that is composed by the following parts: rmem: This part implements a common memory management layer that provides additional features over the basic primitives available for dynamic memory allocation and de-allocation (i.e. kmalloc, kzalloc and kfree). These features provide additional debugging functionalities such as memory tampering (adding pre-defined shims on-top/at-bottom of the memory area to detect out-of-rage writes) and poisoning (initializing the object contents with a known value to detect uninitialized usage) specifically tailored to RINA objects; allowing developers to easily spot memory leaks as well as memory corruption problems.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The Framework. The packaging of a medical device must be furnished with a UDI. According to the FDA, this UDI can involve a standard identification system: HIBCC, ICCBBA or GS1.15 The EU is expected to adopt this format, which also forms the starting point for this document. In order to achieve a safe and workable system in hospitals, it is imperative that the UDI in question meets certain international wants and needs, such as the requirement that the UDI must uniquely identify the product type. Codes have a variety of formats: • The linear bar-code, or ‘1D code’; • The Data Matrix, or ‘2D code’; An example of a linear bar-code: Two examples of a Data Matrix: 15 xxx.xxx.xxx/XxxxxxxXxxxxxx/XxxxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxx/XxxxxxXxxxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxxx/XXXXxxxxxxXxxxxxxx/xxxxxxx.xxx
Sample 1

Related to The Framework

  • Legal Framework 1. This programme agreement shall be read in conjunction with the following documents which, together with this programme agreement, constitute the legal framework of the EEA Financial Mechanism 2014-2021:

  • Framework This Agreement establishes a framework that will enable Red Hat to provide Software and Services to Client. “Software” means Red Hat Enterprise Linux, JBoss Enterprise Middleware and other software programs branded by Red Hat, its Affiliates and/or third parties including all modifications, additions or further enhancements delivered by Red Hat. The specific services (the “Services”) and/or Software that Red Hat will provide to Client will be described in an Order Form, signed by the parties or otherwise accepted by Red Hat, which may consist of (a) one or more mutually agreed order forms, statements of work, work orders or similar transaction documents, or (b) an order placed by Client through Red Hat's online store accessible from a Red Hat website. The parties agree that the terms of this Agreement will govern all purchases and use by Client of Software and Services unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing.

  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework The U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute for Standards and Technology Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Version 1.1.

  • Financial Framework 1. In accordance with Article 2.1 of Protocol 38c, the total amount of the financial contribution is € 1548.1 million in annual tranches of € 221.16 million over the period running from 1 May 2014 to 30 April 2021, inclusive.

  • Performance Framework Service Agreements are a central component of the NSW Health Performance Framework, which documents how the Ministry monitors and assesses the performance of public sector health services to achieve expected service levels, financial performance, governance and other requirements. The performance of a health service is assessed on whether the organisation is meeting the strategic objectives for NSW Health and government, the Premier’s Priorities and performance against key performance indicators. The availability and implementation of governance structures and processes, and whether there has been a significant critical incident or sentinel event also influences the assessment. The Framework sets out responses to performance concerns and management processes that support the achievement of outcomes in accordance with NSW Health and government policies and priorities. Performance concerns will be raised with the Organisation for focused discussion at performance review meetings in line with the NSW Health Performance Framework available at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xx/Xxxxxxxxxxx/Xxxxx/xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx Legislation, governance and performance framework 2021–22 Service Agreement 6

  • Instructional Framework The District and the Association have agreed to the adopted research-based instructional framework developed by Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx and approved by OSPI. The Association and District have also agreed to Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx’x frameworks for specialists for use with other certificated educators.

  • SCOPE OF FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT 3.1 This Framework Agreement governs the relationship between the Authority and the Supplier in respect of the provision of the Services by the Supplier to the Authority and to Other Contracting Bodies.

  • Performance Frameworks ‌ The School's academic, organizational, and financial performance under this Charter Contract shall be evaluated using the Academic, Organizational, and Financial Performance Frameworks, respectively, attached as Exhibit B to this Charter Contract. The specific terms, forms, and requirements of the Performance Frameworks, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are maintained and disseminated by the Commission and shall be binding on the School. Material changes to the Performance Frameworks shall require approval by the Commission.

  • Homework In addition to regular attendance at scheduled classes, each student will be required to devote additional time each week outside the classroom to study and work on assignments.

  • Overview and Purpose of This Contract This Contract is executed by the New York State Office of General Services (OGS), a New York State (NYS) agency authorized by law to issue Centralized Contracts for use by NYS Agencies and other Authorized Users. This Contract establishes Centralized Contracts with Vendors to provide Project Based Information Technology Consulting Services to NYS Authorized Users on a statewide basis. The Centralized Contract establishes a set of standardized terms and conditions, guidelines, processes, and templates for the development, distribution, and award of deliverable-based and fixed- price information technology projects, at the transactional level, through a Mini-Bid process. The Contractor agrees to the terms and conditions set forth in this Centralized Contract and the Contractor is willing to provide such services as set forth herein to Authorized Users The Centralized Contract sets forth a two-step process for each transaction. The first step is the establishment of the centralized contract, through a non-competitive periodic recruitment process. The second step will be competitive, based on the development of a specific project by an Authorized User in accordance with the contractual terms. Information Technology Project needs will be identified by an Authorized User, and documented in a Statement of Work (SOW). The project will then be distributed to Contractors based on specific Lot(s), via the Mini-Bid process. An award shall be based on best- value. The Mini-Bid award will result in an Authorized User Agreement for Project Based Information Technology Consulting Services. Each Authorized User Agreement for Project Based Information Technology Consulting Services will be governed first by the terms and conditions specified in the OGS Centralized Contract and second by terms and conditions added to the Authorized User Mini-Bid. See Appendix B, section 28 regarding modification of Contract terms. Services available under the resultant Contracts will be separated into three (3) distinct Lots. The lot(s) Contractor was awarded are identified in Appendix G, Contractor and OGS Information.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.