The Framework Clause Samples

The Framework. The Framework Agreement is for the provision of an Mini Bus and Coach Hire with Driver Services and has been awarded in RANKING ORDER to the following Providers: 1 YMS Travel Limited (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 2 The Kings Ferry (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 3 Grange Travel Coach Hire Ltd (Gravesend, Kent) 4 ASD Coaches (Strood, Kent) 5 Regents Coaches (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Kent) 1 Grange Travel Coach Hire Ltd (Gravesend, Kent) 2 The Kings Ferry (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 3 Regents Coaches (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Kent) 4 ASD Coaches (Strood, Kent) 5 Scotland & ▇▇▇▇▇ Ltd (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 2 The Kings Ferry (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 3 Regents Coaches (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Kent) 4 Scotland & ▇▇▇▇▇ Ltd (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 5 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Coaches Ltd (Folkstone, Kent) 1 Grange Travel Coach Hire Ltd (Gravesend, Kent) 2 Regents Coaches (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Kent) 3 The Kings Ferry (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 4 Scotland & ▇▇▇▇▇ Ltd (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 1 The Kings Ferry (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇) 2 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Coaches Ltd (Folkstone, Kent) 3 Grange Travel Coach Hire Ltd (Gravesend, Kent)

The Framework. The main objective of SHARE is to provide a community-based living seismic hazard model for the Euro-Mediterranean region and to provide a sustainable mechanism for future updates as new scientific sound methods and data are available. The project aims to establish new standards in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA) practice by a close cooperation of leading European seismologists and engineers. In particular, the project employs state-of-the art Information Technology (IT) to disseminate the data and results to expert and interested non-expert users such as the media and general public. Access to data and results will be granted to the public and specialist through a single entry point, the SHARE Portal via the project web-page at: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇.▇▇▇. SHARE ensures full technical compatibility with the portal technology adopted for other portals in the seismological community. In cooperation with the European-Mediterranean Seismologcial Centre (EMSC) and the foundation for Observatories and Research Facilities for European Seismology (ORFEUS), we ensure not only compatibility in terms of portlets consumable in the different portals, but also in terms of the data services it is based on. SHARE designs its service infrastructure as a comprehensive and homogeneous access point to European seismic hazard data that will be further enhanced within the FP7-funded project “Network of European Research Infrastructures for Earthquake Risk Assessment and Mitigation “ (NERA) to serve the expert seismological, engineering seismology and engineering community as well as non-expert communities. SHARE started to design a facility for hazard and risk assessment as the European component of the Global Earthquake Model Foundation (GEM) and will in cooperation with NERA cooperatively ensure the implementation of the European Facility for Hazard and Risk (EFEHR) as primary access to hazard and risk data and results in Europe. This document describes the design of the architecture that works behind the scenes of the portal GUI and allows interactive as well as script-based data access: the web services. We outline the technical and non-technical requirements, the implementation strategy and defines remaining tasks.

The Framework. The Government of Ukraine and the UNDaPre in mutual agreement to the content of this document and their responsibilities in the implementation of the country programme. Furthering their mutual agreement and cooperation for the realization of the Millennium Development Goals and the United Nations Conventions and Summits to which the Government of Ukraine and UNDP are committed, including: i) sustained economic growth, poverty reduction and social development, ii) governance and local development, and

The Framework. Digital Transformations and Human Rights

The Framework. The Smart Grid Framework for interoperability and cybersecurity is technology agnostic, so as to address as many technological scenarios and environments as possible. The methodology is designed to provide guidance to ease risk management consistent with an organization’s approach to cybersecurity, and tries to integrate both privacy and cybersecurity concepts. The Framework complements the organization’s risk management strategy; it does not substitute it at all. Its main components are the following: - The Framework Core, which is composed of five concurrent Functions: identify (understanding business context, critical functions and associated resources and cybersecurity risks), protect (limiting an eventual cybersecurity event), detect (developing the necessary activities to identify the occurrence of a security event), respond (developing the necessary activities to take actions as a result of the detection of a cybersecurity event) and recover (developing the necessary activities to resume normal operation after the occurrence of a security event, trying to reduce its negative impact). Taken as a whole, these five functions provide a strategic view of the lifecycle of an organization’s management of cybersecurity risk. It also defines key Categories and Subcategories for each function, and matches each of them with the corresponding standards, guidelines and practices, which constitute the Informative References. - The Framework implementation Tiers: the Tiers characterize an organization’s practices over a range, starting from “Partial” (Tier 1) to “Adaptive” (Tier 4), and reflecting a progression from informal responses to approaches that are risk-informed. There are 4 Tiers: Partial (in this stage, cybersecurity risk management practices are not formalized, and risk is managed on an ad hoc and reactive basis), Risk informed (in this stage, risk management practices are approved by management but may not be established as organizational-wide policy), Repeatable (in this stage, the organization’s risk management practices are formally approved and expressed as policy) and Adaptive (in this case, the organization adapts its cybersecurity practices based on its experience and adopts predictive indicators derived from previous and current cybersecurity activities). - A Framework Profile: a Profile represents the outcomes based on business needs that an organization has selected from the Framework Categories and Subcategories, and it can be described by ...

The Framework. 5.1 There are circumstances where it is not possible for a Care Leaver to be placed in supported accommodation using the block provision. Firstly, as an Inner London local authority, there is limited capacity for placements located in the borough. In addition, there could be safeguarding issues preventing a young person from remaining in the borough, or if a young person was placed in care outside of the borough, they may wish to remain in that area after leaving care. 5.2 It is recommended that a framework agreement is established to commission additional semi-independent living placements located in Greater London. This would replace spot purchasing as the current main contracting approach to placements from the private and voluntary sector. It is anticipated that 45 - 50 FTE SIL placements per annum would be commissioned by Hammersmith and Fulham from the Framework Agreement. 5.3 A framework agreement would include a core of semi-independent living providers and establish the underlying standards, service specification, terms and conditions for all placements commissioned through it. It would also fix the unit costs from each provider, which would be submitted as part of the procurement process. The Placements Team would subsequently ‘call off’ placements for individual young people, specifying any particular requirements to tailor the service to their needs. 5.4 The advantages of a Framework Agreement include: • Working with a smaller number of providers in the framework agreement allows the Council to build a more collaborative working relationship. This improves outcomes for young people over time by encouraging more efficient resolution of issues and greater investment into services by providers; • It provides a more robust approach to quality when commissioning placements, as consistent standards, terms and conditions are set out throughout the one-off procurement process and stated in the Framework Agreement; • It continues to ensure flexibility in specifying service requirements to meet the needs of individual young people when calling off from the framework; • Call off arrangements also provide choice and flexibility for commissioners when identifying the most suitable placements for individual young people; • It allows Commissioners to be responsive to the fluctuating service volumes of the Care Leaver cohort; • It provides a more robust approach to managing costs and budgets, as unit costs are set through the one-off procurement process which ...

The Framework. The packaging of a medical device must be furnished with a UDI. According to the FDA, this UDI can involve a standard identification system: HIBCC, ICCBBA or GS1.15 The EU is expected to adopt this format, which also forms the starting point for this document. In order to achieve a safe and workable system in hospitals, it is imperative that the UDI in question meets certain international wants and needs, such as the requirement that the UDI must uniquely identify the product type. Codes have a variety of formats: • The linear bar-code, or ‘1D code’; • The Data Matrix, or ‘2D code’; An example of a linear bar-code: Two examples of a Data Matrix: 15 ▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇

The Framework. All the components of the kernel-space IRATI stack rely on a base framework that is composed by the following parts: rmem: This part implements a common memory management layer that provides additional features over the basic primitives available for dynamic memory allocation and de-allocation (i.e. kmalloc, kzalloc and kfree). These features provide additional debugging functionalities such as memory tampering (adding pre-defined shims on-top/at-bottom of the memory area to detect out-of-rage writes) and poisoning (initializing the object contents with a known value to detect uninitialized usage) specifically tailored to RINA objects; allowing developers to easily spot memory leaks as well as memory corruption problems.