Figure 1 definition

Figure 1. Symbol "Does not protect chin from impacts@
Figure 1 of this Chart means Chart 2 of this thesis.
Figure 1. Mirvetuximab Soravtansine Structure

Examples of Figure 1 in a sentence

  • Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1 Figure 1.

  • Figure 1 below, before section 7.7, illustrates the procedure to follow if you have any concerns about a child’s welfare.Where possible, speak to the DSL first to agree a course of action.If in exceptional circumstances the DSL is not available, this should not delay appropriate action being taken.

  • Figure 1: Hydrologic Cycle and Sources of Drinking Water Illustration courtesy of USGS Types of Public Water SystemsA public water system is defined as a system for the provision to the public of water for human consumption through pipes or other constructed conveyances, if such system has at least 15 service connections or regularly serves at least 25 individuals.

  • All mainline density locations after test strip should have a longitudinal- as well as transverse-random number to determine location as detailed in the WisDOT Test Method for HMA PWL QMP Density Measurements for Main Production section of this document.] Individual locations are represented by the symbol as seen in Figure 1 above.

  • Minimum underlying policies, coverages, and limits shall include all policies listed in Figure 1.


More Definitions of Figure 1

Figure 1. Digital Terrain Model of the Napperby Region
Figure 1. Overall organizational structure as defined in GEI Plan North Sea.
Figure 1. Schematic cross-section of embedded ferroelectric RAM. ** . ** . ** . ** Table 1: ** ** .
Figure 1. SITA’s Global Project Management: SITA’s project management processes and procedures have been tested through 50+ years of providing wide area network services to the air transport community on an unprecedented global scale. SITA is uniquely positioned to draw upon proven global Program Management expertise, processes, and operations (see Figure 1) to provide Worldspan with a low risk migration path to IP. We will provide the necessary resources to ensure the successful delivery of quality Wide Area Network (WAN) services. Our robust Program Management plan employs a total quality management approach that includes: • Worldspan not only as the final decision maker but also as an integral member of the Project Management team • A mutually agreed, realistic and low risk schedule through integrated management and maintenance • Implementation of Change Management to provide flexibility in accommodating project changes • Proactive Risk Management designed for early identification, assessment, and mitigation of project risks • A dedicated Customer Satisfaction Manager to ensure the highest level of quality and Worldspan’s complete satisfaction [**] = Confidential treatment requested for redacted portion; redacted portion has been filed separately with the Commission. • The use of Project Management experts who have managed and executed programs of similar size and scopeState of the art communications technology to ensure timely and accurate communication between the Worldspan and SITA Project Offices To support the Worldspan IP Migration, the London-based Project Management team will consist of [at least] three fully dedicated resources for the duration of the project: one (1) Senior Project Manager / Project Director and two (2) Project Managers. These resources will comprise the core of the “Worldpan IP Migration Project Office,” that will be the Single Point of Contact (SPOC) for all project issues. This Project Office will be Worldspan’s link to SITA’s global Program Management infrastructure, described in greater detail below. It will be this team’s responsibility to insure that the migration progresses according to Worldspan’s and SITA’s mutually agreed objectives.
Figure 1. Most recent GHG emissions data EU9 Electricity Industry Other power/energy (e.g. CHP) 9 EU ETS emission data from EUTL (2016); non-ETS data from EEA (2015). Non-ETS emissions in MT Waste, 141, 6% Industry (non- ETS), 423, 17% Transport, 890, 35% Agriculture, 436, 17% Buildings, 630, 25% Transport Buildings Agriculture Industry (non-ETS) Waste The most promising technologies that would enable reductions in GHG emissions across all sectors of the economy, consistent with a target of more than 95% GHG emissions reductions in the EU, are listed below. The concept of ‘deep decarbonisation’ has been introduced to convey what is necessary on a global scale to limit emissions to the extent that the UNFCCC’s temperature targets (as expressed in the Paris Agreement) are feasible. Specifically, deep decarbonisation means that global emissions should reach net-zero between 2050 and 2075 (DDPP, 2015), but also that steps taken to address GHG emissions allow and prepare for deeper steps beyond that. Technology deployment is intrinsically linked to this step by step decarbonisation, as technologies that wholly transform processes have a higher potential to contribute to deep decarbonisation than incremental efficiency improvements to existing processes.
Figure 1. Map of the BioItzá-Corozal-Zotz Conservation Agreement Area
Figure 1. Means values of important habitat selection variables (Canopy Cover (Percentage) [A], Slope (Degrees) [B], and Shrub Density (Shrubs/Hectare) [C]) for black-capped vireos in Mexico, 2002-2004. Whiskers indicate a 95% confidence interval.