Provision of Required Special Education Sample Clauses

Provision of Required Special Education. The State shall provide all eligible youth confined at the facility special education services as required by the XXXX, 00 X.X.X. §0000 et seq., and regulations promulgated thereunder.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Provision of Required Special Education. The Court shall provide all eligible youth confined at the facility special education services as required by the IDEA, §§ 1400-1490, and regulations promulgated thereunder. The Court understands that an adequate number of special education teachers is an essential prerequisite to providing appropriate special education services.
Provision of Required Special Education. The State shall provide all eligible youth confined at the facility special education services as required by the IDEA, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq., and regulations promulgated thereunder. Compliance Rating Partial Compliance Discussion During this reporting period, MSDE took a number of steps to respond to concerns noted in the First Monitors’ Report. In addition to appointing a principal, new staff at BCJJC included a special education lead teacher and a transition specialist. The school has also experimented with a new schedule that xxxxxxxx the class times for youth in detention and those pending placement. The schedule also makes more effective use of the gymnasium and frees up additional time for the lead teacher to assist the principal in managing the school. The school now has a timeout room that is staffed part-time by an instructional assistant. In response to concerns about safety and the need for greater collaboration between school staff and direct care staff, MSDE and DJS have conducted two joint training activities designed to deescalate potential student behavior problems. De-escalation training was provided by the Department of Juvenile Services; an outside vendor provided “RAP” training. The joint training also provided an opportunity for school staff and unit staff to use common language and techniques in working with students. An outgrowth of the training has been weekly meetings between the superintendent and representative DJS staff and representative school staff. MSDE and DJS have also been working to develop a unified system of assigning students points for appropriate behavior. Related to this and the joint training have been efforts to clarify a uniform set of classroom expectations for students and staff. MSDE temporarily assigned several staff from the Xxxxxx School to assist BCJJC staff in organizing intake and records management. Review of residential services logbook kept by DJS staff in the school indicates that in general, more units are getting youth to school on time than was the case during earlier site visits though problems remain. For example, on March 27, 2008, the log book indicates “No first period class. Not enough teachers.” and “No afternoon class for unit #32 and 33. No teacher available.” On April 24, the log book notes, “Unit 41 and 43 are not in education due to staff shortage in detention.” DJS staff has begun moving units to school at 8:15 am and a number of units are regularly in class and ready to begin sch...
Provision of Required Special Education. The State shall provide all eligible youth confined at the facilities special education services as required by the IDEA, 20 U.S.C. 1400‐1490, and regulations promulgated thereunder, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794, and regulations promulgated thereunder. Status Xxxxxx School Substantial Compliance (as of June 30, 2008) Cheltenham Youth Facility Substantial Compliance (as of December 31, 2007) Discussion Compliance with the provision is dependent upon the facilities achieving compliance with all other provisions in this section of the Memorandum. The State achieved compliance with this provision during the last reporting period. The education monitor made an unannounced site visit on June 5, 2008. The concerns noted in the preliminary draft of the sixth report had been addressed. See the discussion under III.F.v. Individualized Education Programs, below. Recommendations Cheltenham has been in substantial compliance with this provision for approximately 6 months, beginning December 31, 2007. Xxxxxx is in substantial compliance with this provision as of June 30, 2008. It is recommended that: 1. MSDE and DJS education staff are encouraged to meet regularly to discuss areas of concerns related to the education program. The DJS Office of Quality Assurance and Accountability and MSDE are encouraged to independently monitor the special education programs compliance with agency standards and State and Federal law, particularly at the Xxxxxx School. Evidentiary Basis Site visits to Xxxxxx School (5/5, 5/7, 6/5) and Cheltenham Youth Facility (4/23, 4/25); review of documents; interviews with students and staff.
Provision of Required Special Education. The State shall provide all eligible youth confined at the facility special education services as required by the IDEA, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq., and regulations promulgated thereunder. Compliance Rating Partial Compliance Discussion Special education services have experienced tremendous growth at BCJJC during the nearly two years of the Agreement. Among other things, MSDE and DJS have collaborated to create additional classroom space, coordinate training activities, schedule bi-weekly meetings, and hold daily briefings. The Monitor observed high levels of student engagement in several classes he visited during this reporting period. Problems noted in earlier reports including inadequate screening and identification have been addressed and the school at BCJJC does an effective job of managing the intake of a large number of students and their school records. Other notable events during this period include a team-building workshop conducted by MSDE for teachers and support staff in February. The focus of the meeting was developing ways for teachers to connect with their students. The school also conducted two special activities that involved bringing community resources inside the facility. “Winterfest,” held in December, enabled students to meet with representatives from agencies and programs who may be useful to them following their return to the community. In April, “Careers Day” enabled a number of students from BCJJC to meet with representatives from Baltimore City Community College to discuss post-secondary education opportunities. Another positive development has been the convening of a daily “morning meeting” between MSDE and DJS staff to review the status of each unit, review any scheduling changes, and address emerging problems. Representatives of the school and DJS leadership team also meet on a bi-weekly basis to review operations as they pertain to the school. During this reporting period, MDSE and DJS leadership staff jointly traveled to the Xxxxxx School in Wilmington, Delaware to observe a state-operated juvenile correctional facility that at one time, experienced some of the same challenges to providing education and special education services as BCJJC. Leadership staff reported that they plan to make a similar visit to the Fairfax County Juvenile Detention Center in Virginia. For the first time since BCJJC opened in the fall of 2003, there now appears to be sufficient classroom space for the approximately 120 youth detained at the facility....

Related to Provision of Required Special Education

  • Special Education Services 1. The parties agree to uphold the tenets contained within the "Special Education Services: A Manual of Policies, Procedures and Guidelines” document (February 2011) published by the BC Ministry of Education.

  • Provision of Covered Services Contractor shall undertake commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that each Participating Provider Agreement and each subcontracting arrangement entered into by each Participating Provider complies with the applicable terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, as mutually agreed upon by Covered California and Contractor, and which may include the following:

  • Food Service Waste Reduction Requirements Contractor shall comply with the Food Service Waste Reduction Ordinance, as set forth in San Francisco Environment Code Chapter 16, including but not limited to the remedies for noncompliance provided therein.

  • Special Education Special education services, related services, and accommodations for students who are eligible under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), or any applicable provisions of state law, shall be provided in accordance with applicable state and federal law, this Agreement and Authorizer rules and policies. The Authorizer is the LEA for purposes of ensuring compliance with IDEA, Section 504, and all other federal and state laws and regulations concerning accommodation of and education of students with disabilities.

  • INDIVIDUAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This contract shall include an Individual Services Agreement (ISA) developed for each LEA pupil to whom CONTRACTOR is to provide special education and/or related services. An ISA shall only be issued for LEA pupils enrolled with the approval of the LEA pursuant to Education Code section 56366 (a)(2)(A). ISAs are void upon termination or expiration of the Master Contract. In the event that this Master Contract expires or terminates, CONTRACTOR and the LEA shall continue to be bound to all of the terms and conditions of the most recent executed ISAs between CONTRACTOR and LEA for so long as CONTRACTOR is servicing authorized LEA pupils, until such time as a new Master Contract is executed. Any and all changes to a LEA pupil’s educational placement/program provided under this Master Contract and/or an ISA shall be made solely on the basis of a revision to the LEA pupil’s IEP/IFSP. At any time during the term of this Master Contract, a LEA pupil’s parent, CONTRACTOR, or XXX may request a review of a LEA pupil’s IEP/IFSP subject to all procedural safeguards required by law, including notice to and participation by the CONTRACTOR in the IEP Team meeting. Unless otherwise provided in this Master Contract, the CONTRACTOR shall provide all services specified in the IEP/IFSP unless the CONTRACTOR and the LEA agree otherwise in the ISA. (California Education Code sections 56366(a) (5) and 3062(e)). In the event the CONTRACTOR is unable to provide a specific service at any time during the term of the ISA, the CONTRACTOR shall notify the LEA in writing within five (5) business days of the last date a service was provided. If a parent or XXX contests the termination of an ISA by initiating a due process proceeding with the California Office of Administrative Hearings (hereinafter referred to as “OAH”), CONTRACTOR shall abide by the “stay- put” requirement of state and federal law unless the parent agrees otherwise or an interim alternative educational placement is deemed lawful and appropriate by LEA or OAH. Disagreements between XXX and CONTRACTOR concerning the formulation of an ISA or the Master Contract may be appealed to the local SELPA office prior to appeal to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction pursuant to the provisions of California Education Code section 56366 (C) (2).

  • Lodgement of SWS wage assessment agreement C.6.1 All SWS wage assessment agreements under the conditions of this schedule, including the appropriate percentage of the relevant minimum wage to be paid to the employee, must be lodged by the employer with Fair Work Australia.

  • Special Education Teachers Whenever any Elementary Special Education class to which a student(s) is(are) added as a result of the distribution of students from the class of an absent Elementary Special Education teacher, Article 8-7 shall be in effect. In addition, whenever the class size of the receiving Special Education teacher exceeds the class size maxim mandated by Special Education class size law and/or regulation, the Xxxxxxxx Formula in AAA Case No. 1139-0696- 85, February 21, 1986, shall be used to calculate the compensation which said teacher shall receive as follows: The rate of pay for said teacher for teaching said additional students shall be computed by multiplying the teacher’s daily gross compensation by a fraction in which the denominator is twenty-six (26) and the numerator is the number of children taught in excess of Article 8-1.1 Item 3 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the parties.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.