Epilogue. The out-of-line template epilogue is the reverse of the prologue. The epilogue restores the stack pointer and the return address. In addition, register a is tested to update the ccr flags. This testing is a part of the C compiler code generation feature and should be included in functions that return values in the a register (see Section 5.4.5 for optimiza- tion).
Epilogue. Since the November 2007 summit, a number of information sharing initiatives have emerged and expanded. We summarize some of these changes below: Suspicious Activity Reporting (SARS) To demonstrate how the concept of intelligence-led policing, as discussed in this report, can be deployed in an operational environment, DOJ, PM-ISE, and the FBI, in partnership with the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA), IACP, and Global, embarked on an effort in the spring of 2008, to establish a national capacity for gathering, documenting, processing, analyzing, and sharing terrorism related suspicious activities reports—or Suspicious Activities Reports (SARs), as called for in the National Strategy for Information Sharing. Supporting this effort is the Information Sharing Environment (ISE)-SAR Functional Standard, issued in January 2008, which defines both the data standards and business processes that will enable the sharing of terrorism-related SARs across the ISE— particularly between state and major urban area fusion centers and federal entities at the headquarters level. In the spring of 2008, local best practices were identified regarding training front line personnel to recognize terrorism-related suspicious activities that may represent pre- incident indicators of a terrorism threat, and documenting those activities once observed. The results of this effort are documented in the draft June 2008 report, Findings and Recommendations of the Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Support and Implementation Project.18 Building on the report’s findings and recommendations, 12 state and local jurisdictions were selected to institute a standardized approach to gathering, documenting, processing, analyzing, and sharing terrorism related suspicious activities reports. Front line law enforcement personnel in these 12 locations will be trained to recognize behaviors and incidents indicative of criminal activity associated with domestic and international terrorism. Once reported or observed, behaviors and incidents indicative of criminal activity will be documented and evaluated by trained personnel to determine if they have a terrorism nexus. If a potential nexus with terrorism is established, the SAR will be made available to the local JTTF, regional and/or statewide fusion centers, and DHS. Technical resources will be provided to enable the “posting” of terrorism-related SARs to a “shared space” in a manner consistent with technical standards contained within the ISE-SAR Func...
Epilogue. Art as an Expression of Syrian Orthodox Identity?
Epilogue. After publication of the present chapter, more decisions have been rendered by national courts on judicial review of diplomatic protection. One decision deserves special mentioning, since it confirms the above analysis and emphasises the importance of government representations in case of serious human rights violations. On 8 March 2007, the Federal Court of Australia, per Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, rendered its decision in the case of Xxxxx x. Xxxxxxx.149 Xx. Xxxxx, a previous detainee on Guantanamo Bay, brought a case against the Australian government, inter alia arguing that the latter’s decision not to proceed with negotiations on Xx Xxxxx’ behalf to secure release from Guan- tanamo Bay and repatriation to Australia was based on irrelevant considera- tions. The Australian Government applied for a ‘summary judgment’ seeking dismissal of the case for lack of reasonable prospect of success. Although the Court acknowledged that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs generally has a wide discretion in such matter, it rejected the motion for summary judgment and held that [i]t is clear in the case before me that the deprivation of liberty for over five years without valid charge is an even more fundamental contravention of a fundamental principle and as such and exceptional case as to justify proceeding to hearing by this Court.150 148 Such as Article 8 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights; Article 6 of the European Convention for Protection of Human Rights; Article 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights; Article 8 of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights. 149 Xxxxx v Xxxxxxx [2007] FCA 299. 150 Ibid., at para. 91.
Epilogue. This document details a recipe for, and an insight into the process of how sausages are made. Negotiated multi-party agreements are always very much like developing a recipe by committee. Every chef gets to put an ingredient into the mixture, but every chef would not necessarily choose to use all of the same ingredients if they were making the sausages from their own personal recipe. The trick is to craft a sausage recipe that everybody can swallow without choking on it. The November 2021 Share Trust Repurposing Agreement is not the deal that the Council of Unions originally envisioned or worked so hard to achieve for six years. Nor is it the deal that Air Canada originally envisioned. This agreement represents the very best deal that could be achieved for the benefit of our members that Air Canada could swallow without choking on it, and vice-versa. After seventy-four (74) months of work by the Council of Unions trying to get an agreement to repurpose the 2009 Share Trust, the right combination of circumstances, opportunity and understanding finally presented itself during the last six months to make this agreement possible. The repurposing agreement contains a benefit for active members of both the legacy defined benefit pension and the MEPP through the series of VSP offerings. It contains a small measure of retroactive compensation to all of our retired pensioners in lieu of the indexation that has been lost from our pension plan since 2007. And finally, it provides a small measure of future financial benefit and retirement security for our current and future pensioners for the next fifteen (15) years. All of the parties realized that they faced a rapidly closing window of opportunity to achieve a repurposing agreement on the 2009 Share Trust. As evidenced by the January 1, 2021 actuarial valuation reports, every single one of Air Canada’s unionized employee groups now has a minority of their active members in their defined benefit pension plans. 2021 is the cross-over year where, for the first time, all five Air Canada unions will have the majority of their active members not contributing and earning service in the defined benefit pension plans. If a repurposing agreement could not be achieved this year, then going forward it would become increasingly less likely that a deal could ever be reached to benefit any of our members. The Share Trust Repurposing Agreement is not perfect, but very few things in life are. It is not everything that we had hoped f...
Epilogue. While In re Gault marked a culmination of processes that had been developing for decades, it did not mark the end of anxieties regarding juvenile crime. In the 1980s, fears of youth crime in the American pubic continued to escalate, as the media continued to sensationalize youth violence, and national crime statistics failed to become more transparent in their depiction of juvenile crime. Consequently, Americans called on their legislators to increasingly criminalize youth offenses. State and federal lawmakers have passed laws to make the juvenile justice system more punitive and require the transfer of younger children to adult courts for a greater variety of offenses and in more ways.246 As a result of these policies, juvenile incarceration climbed throughout the end of the twentieth century until it peaked in 1999, with over 100,000 juveniles placed in facilities nationwide.247 The story of juvenile justice in the twentieth century is largely a tale of increasing incarceration, criminalization, and personhood afforded to youth offenders. However, twenty-first-century reforms have begun to steer the path of juvenile justice in a different direction. At the turn of the century, over 100,000 youth offenders were incarcerated. By 2014, that figure dropped by 53 percent, to less than 51,000 children.248 This change can be largely attributed to the growth and activism of juvenile justice reform groups. Organizations such as the Coalition for Juvenile Justice, Children’s Defense Fund, and Center for Juvenile Justice Reform have fought for changes at the state and federal level. 246 “Patterns and Trends in Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice,” National Academic Press. 247 Joshua Rovner, “Declines in Youth Commitments and Facilities in the 21st Century,” The Sentencing Project, December 11, 2015. 248 Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Juvenile Residential Facility Census, Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Policymakers have reformed the juvenile justice system by focusing on early intervention, addressing child abuse and neglect, eliminating “zero tolerance” policies, implementing school-based conflict resolution programs, diverting youth from the criminal justice system, and prioritizing the continuation of education.249
Epilogue. THE CHENAB DAM DISPUTE India plans to implement the Baglihar Hydropower Project on the Chenab River in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. The project has been in planning since 1992. Pakistan government regards this as an abrogation of the Indus Water Treaty and raised objections to the design, height, storage capacity, and gates of the spillway structure of the Baglihar power plant. Furthermore, Pakistan has argued that the construction of the dam will temporarily deplete the flow in the river during the sowing season in Punjab province in Pakistan. The monsoons may further worsen the conditions. India continues to claim that Pakistan’s arguments do not hold weight because the treaty clearly states that power generation projects can be built on any of these three western rivers of the Indus River system as long as they benefit the local people and generally do not interrupt the flow of the river. Soon after bilateral talks in January 2004 failed, Pakistan asked for the interven- tion of the World Bank (World Bank, 2005a). The World Bank announced (World Bank, 2005b) that it would appoint a “neutral expert”, Xx. Xxxxxx to arbitrate. The neutral expert was selected after being approved by the two riparians. A report has been released. (Another hydroelectric project which is being objected to by Pakistan Case Study 3: The Indus River Basin 279 is the Kishan Ganga project being constructed on the Jhelum river by India, and is seen as contravening the Indus Waters Treaty.) Pakistan’s concerns in this dispute, which are expressed in terms of design parameters, surround the following points: (a) Pakistan feels that India will be able to store excessive amounts of water behind the dam, more than the Treaty permits, leading to control over irrigation water flow on one hand and ability to flood downstream areas; and (b) Pakistan takes issue with the fact that construction began before it granted approval. Pointing to the capricious nature of flood analysis and the possibility that climate change may increase future floods, Xx. Xxxxxx determined that it is sensible to use 16,500 m3/second. A related point contested between the two riparians was whether the Baglihar dam needed a gated or ungated spillway. To minimize India’s ability to regulate the river’s flow, Pakistan insisted that since the Baglihar was a run-of-the-river plant it required an ungated spillway. Drawing attention to its need to regulate floods and manage heavy sedimentation that would otherwise decrease...
Epilogue. 38. Especially in the case of PhD students, Xxx Xxxxx said it best: “If you cannot get your own s—t together, you are not going to make it as a research leader”.6
Epilogue. 4 (5): 44–49. ^ Xxxxxxxx, War and Peace in Modern India 2010, p. 106. ^ a b c Malhotra, Brig (Retd)V P (2010), Security and Defence Related Treaties of India, Xxx Books India Pvt Ltd, p. 7, ISBN 978-93-82573-16-6 ^ a b Birdwood, Two Nations and Kashmir 1956, p. 45. ^ Xxxxxxxx, Solving Kashmir 2006, p. 328. ^ Birdwood, Two Nations and Kashmir 1956, p. 46. ^ Xxxxxxxxx, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, pp. 40–41. ^ Xxxxx, The Story of Integration of the Indian States (1956), p. 222. ^ x x Xxxxx, The Story of Integration of the Indian States (1956), p. 225. ^ Xxxxx, The Story of Integration of the Indian States (1956), p. 226; Xxxxx, October Coup (2012), Chapter: The Beginning of the End ^ Xxxxx, The Story of Integration of the Indian States (1956), pp. 225–227. ^ Xxxxx, October Coup (2012), Chapter: The Beginning of the End. ^ Xxxxxx, The Great Divide (1969), p. 480; Xxxxx, October Coup (2012), Chapter: The Beginning of the End ^ Xxxxxx, The Great Divide (1969), p. 480. ^ Xxxxx, The Story of Integration of the Indian States (1956), p. 229. ^ Xxxxx, The Story of Integration of the Indian States (1956), pp. 231–232. ^ Xxxxx, Border incidents, internal disorder and the nizam's claim (2007), p. 216. ^ Xxxxx, The Story of Integration of the Indian States (1956), p. 231. ^ Xxxxxx, The Great Divide (1969), pp. 480–481. ^ Xxxxxx, The Great Divide (1969), pp. 480–481; Xxxxxxxx, War and Peace in Modern India (2010), p. 77; Xxxxxxxx, From Autocracy to Integration (2000), pp. 213–215 ^ Raghavan, War and Peace in Modern India (2010), p. 98. ^ Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxxx, India since Independence (2008), p. 96. Bibliography Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx (2007), Demystifying Kashmir, Xxxxxxx Education India, ISBN 978-8131708460 Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx X. (2000) [University of Western Australia, 1985], From Autocracy to Integration: Political Developments in Hyderabad State, 1938-1948, Orient Blackswan, ISBN 978-81-250-1847-6 Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx X. (2006), Solving Kashmir, Lancer Publishers, ISBN 978-81-7062-125-6 Birdwood, Lord (1956), Two Nations and Kashmir, X. Xxxx – via xxxxxxx.xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx; Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx; Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx (2008) [first published 1999], India since Independence, Penguin Books India, ISBN 978-0-14-310409-4 Xxxxxx, X. X. (1969), The Great Divide: Britain, India, Pakistan, London: Xxxxxxxxxx, ISBN 9780090971503 Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx (2012), October Coup, A Memoir of the Struggle for Hyderabad, Roli Books, ISBN 978-8174368508 Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx X. (2007), "Border incidents, in...
Epilogue. 4.1. The signatories of the present, legal representatives of the social partners are authorized as jointly and / or individually acting, to do what is further required, according to F.I.F.A. and what is provided for by law, in order that the Regulations and their Annexes and Models . beyond their legal existence and validity acquire by the signature of the present, are approved, ratified and acquire the full legal effect and validity, according to what is foreseen especially by F.I.F.A. and U.E.F.A. in the applicable sports law and in general status, in connection to the valid national and non-collective in general labor law, the law of collective labor contracts, the labor and in general the legislation and mandatory and binding national law.
