Review of the Sample Clauses

Review of the. State of the Forest 52. Each year, the agreement holders perform evaluations to assess the current state of the forest. For example, inventories are undertaken at silvicultural sites ten (10) years after planting. These inventories permit an evaluation of whether the works performed are likely to produce the expected results as set out in the general forest management plans (validation of the basis of calculation set out in the general forest management plan). These inventories also make it possible to evaluate the evolution of the natural regeneration of the forests following forest management activities. 53. At present, these reviews of the state of the forest are described in the Xxxxxx d’aménagement forestier published in 1998 and constitute an obligation for the agreement holders. The ministère des Ressources naturelles shall verify the information that is collected by the agreement holders using a sampling process (e.g. verification of 10% of the parcels performed by the agreement holders). 54. To ensure that the sampling also reflects Cree concerns, the joint working groups shall be involved in the process of establishing the program of validation of information concerning the state of the forest. The program includes, among other things, the list of works that will be verified as well as the sampling techniques that will be used. 55. The joint working groups shall inform the Cree-Québec Forestry Board of proposals of sampling methods regarding the protection of wildlife habitats. 56. The involvement of the joint working groups shall take place at the stage of elaborating the annual program or upon receipt of a proposed program from the ministère des Ressources naturelles. In the latter case, the joint working groups may propose modifications to the program. The joint working groups shall make the necessary recommendations in both cases. 57. The results of the forest management verification shall be provided to the joint working groups and the Cree-Québec Forestry Board. 58. The joint working groups or their members may make recommendations to the Cree-Québec Forestry Board and to the Ministre regarding any issue concerning the current state of the forest. 59. Within the framework of the reviews of the state of the forest, the Cree- Québec Forestry Board shall elaborate draft directives aimed at introducing into the forest management planning process strategies that can take into account the protection and development of wildlife habitats. These dra...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of the methodological approaches and processes undertaken in the Irish specific ED nurse staffing reviews and international evidence on staffing in EDs
Review of the comments 2.1.1 Process Concerns Trademark Association (INTA), the Coalition for Online Accountability (COA, a group of nine copyright industry organizations), and .NYC representative Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx. Other participants expressed concerns that ICANN staff should not create the EOI without further discussion among the community, the GNSO, the ccNSO, the GAC and the ALAC; the COA worried that the EOI proposal was premature given the number of other outstanding issues with the gTLD program.
Review of the policies for information security The policies for information security are reviewed at planned intervals or if significant changes occur to ensure their continuing suitability,adequacy and effectiveness.
Review of the. QM system at the supplier’s facility

Related to Review of the

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Inspection/Testing In order to assess Supplier’s work quality and/or compliance with this Order, upon reasonable notice by Buyer: (a) all goods, materials and services related to the items purchased hereunder, including, raw materials, components, assemblies, work in process, tools and end products shall be subject to inspection and testing by Buyer, its customer, representative or regulatory authorities at all places, including sites where the goods are made or located or the services are performed, whether at Supplier’s premises or elsewhere; and (b) all of Supplier’s facilities, books and records relating to this Order shall be subject to inspection by Buyer or its designee. If specific Buyer and/or Buyer’s customer tests, inspection and/or witness points are included in this Order, the goods shall not be shipped without an inspector’s release or a written waiver of test/inspection/witness with respect to each such point; however, Buyer shall not be permitted to unreasonably delay shipment; and Supplier shall notify Buyer in writing at least twenty (20) days prior to each of Supplier’s scheduled final and, if applicable, intermediate test/inspection/witness points. Supplier agrees to cooperate with such/audit inspection including, completing and returning questionnaires and making available its knowledgeable representatives. Buyer’s failure to inspect or test goods, materials or services or Buyer’s failure to reject or detect defects by inspection or testing shall not relieve Supplier from its warranty obligations or any of its other obligations or responsibilities under this Order. Supplier agrees to provide small business as well as minority and/or women owned business utilization and demographic data upon request.

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Review of assessment The assessment of the applicable percentage should be subject to annual review or earlier on the basis of a reasonable request for such a review. The process of review shall be in accordance with the procedures for assessing capacity under the Supported Wage System.

  • Inspection; Compliance Lessor and Lessor's Lender(s) (as defined in Paragraph 8.3(a)) shall have the right to enter the Premises at any time, in the case of an emergency, and otherwise at reasonable times, for the purpose of inspecting the condition of the Premises and for verifying compliance by Lessee with this Lease and all Applicable Laws (as defined in Paragraph 6.3), and to employ experts and/or consultants in connection therewith and/or to advise Lessor with respect to Lessee's activities, including but not limited to the installation, operation, use, monitoring, maintenance, or removal of any Hazardous Substance or storage tank on or from the Premises. The costs and expenses of any such inspections shall be paid by the party requesting same, unless a Default or Breach of this Lease, violation of Applicable Law, or a contamination, caused or materially contributed to by Lessee is found to exist or be imminent, or unless the inspection is requested or ordered by a governmental authority as the result of any such existing or imminent violation or contamination. In any such case, Lessee shall upon request reimburse Lessor or Lessor's Lender, as the case may be, for the costs and expenses of such inspections.

  • Department Review The parties shall resolve disputes through written submission of their dispute to the Department’s Contract Manager. The Department shall respond to the dispute in writing within ten (10) Business Days from the date that the Department’s Contract Manager receives the dispute. The Department’s decision shall be final unless a party provides the other party with written notice of the party’s disagreement with the decision within ten (10) Business Days from the date of the Department’s decision. If a party disagrees with the Department’s decision, the party may proceed to subsection (b) below.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!