To determine Sample Clauses

To determine qualifications for employment and the nature and content of personnel examinations;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
To determine the times when options shall be granted and the number of shares to be optioned; (d) to determine the option price of the shares subject to each option, which price shall be not less than the minimum specified in ARTICLE V; (e) to determine the time or times when each option becomes exercisable, the duration of the exercise period and any other restrictions on the exercise of options issued hereunder; (f) to prescribe the form or forms of the option agreements under the Plan (which forms shall be consistent with the terms of the Plan but need not be identical); (g) to adopt, amend and rescind such rules and regulations as, in its opinion, may be advisable in the administration of the Plan; and (h) to construe and interpret the Plan, the rules and regulations and the option agreements under the Plan and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Committee shall be final and binding on all optionees.
To determine whether the envisaged rebinding of the EC tariff on bananas would result in at least maintaining total market access for MFN banana suppliers, taking into account [all EC WTO market-access commitments relating to bananas].1 The terms of the mandate thus require the Arbitrator to consider whether or not a certain outcome "would result" from a certain action. The text of the mandate may be broken down into three elements. The first is the "envisaged rebinding of the EC tariff on bananas". This language describes the action at the centre of the required analysis. The second element comprises a benchmark against which the envisaged rebinding of the EC tariff on bananas is to be assessed. Thus, this element of the mandate requires the Arbitrator to determine whether the envisaged rebinding "would result in at least maintaining total market access for MFN banana suppliers". The third, and final, element is a direction to the Arbitrator to take into account all EC WTO market-access commitments relating to bananas whilst performing the analysis under its mandate. There is no disagreement as to the meaning and scope of the first element of the mandate. The parties agree that the "envisaged rebinding of the EC tariff on bananas" is reflected in the EC proposal to record a new commitment in its WTO schedule under tariff heading CN 08030019 at €230 per metric ton.2 The parties differ, however, over the interpretation of the second and third textual elements of the mandate. With respect to the second element, the Interested Parties generally argue that the concept of "at least maintaining" denotes that—at a minimum—the European Communities must keep in existence and must not allow diminution of the relevant market access of MFN suppliers through the rebinding.3 The European Communities, for its part, submits that the Arbitrators are required to examine "if the proposed new concession would not increase the level of protection (and conversely diminish the market access rights of MFN suppliers) as compared with the level of protection offered by the European Communities' current concession".4 The Interested Parties add that "maintaining" total market access carries with it a temporal, prospective dimension, such that total market access—appropriately defined—must be preserved in time.5 The parties offer markedly different interpretations as to the meaning of the phrase "total market access for MFN banana suppliers", and the significance and scope of the EC commitments to...
To determine whether the envisaged rebinding of the EC tariff on bananas would result in at least maintaining total market access for MFN banana suppliers, taking into account [certain] EC commitments. Paragraph 1 of the Doha Waiver provides as follows: Subject to the terms and conditions set out hereunder, Article I, paragraph 1 of the General Agreement shall be waived, until 31 December 2007, to the extent necessary to permit the European Communities to provide preferential tariff treatment for products originating in ACP States as required by Article 36.3, Annex 5 and its Protocols of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, without being required to extend the same preferential treatment to like products of any other member. (footnote omitted) It is clear, on a plain reading of the fourth tiret of the Annex to the Doha Waiver, that the Arbitrator's mandate does not explicitly require the Arbitrator to assess whether the European Communities' envisaged rebinding is consistent with the conditions set forth in Paragraph 1 of the Doha Waiver. Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama argue, however, that the Arbitrator may consider substantive claims that the European Communities' envisaged rebinding does not comply with the conditions of the Doha Waiver, and request the Arbitrator to review the consistency of the European Communities' proposed rebinding against the terms of Paragraph 1. The European Communities contests this submission, submitting that the Arbitrator's "terms of reference" (or "jurisdiction") are limited to the terms of the mandate.3 In seeking to show that an examination under Paragraph 1 of the Doha Waiver is within the jurisdiction of the Arbitrator in this proceeding, notwithstanding the lack of any express authority for such jurisdiction within the terms of the Annex to the Doha Waiver, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama rely, in particular, upon the wording of Paragraph 3bis of the Doha Waiver, which provides that: With respect to bananas, the additional provisions in the Annex shall apply. Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama submit that the use of the term "additional" means that both the general requirements of the Waiver, and the "additional" provisions of the Annex, apply in respect of bananas. Thus, in the submission of Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, claims under the general provisions of the Waiver may be brought before the Arbitrator. The Arbitrator agrees with Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama that both the "additional" Annex provisions as well as the general provis...
To determine a Party's compliance with the Interconnection Performance Benchmarks, on and after the first Interconnection Activation Date hereunder, each Party shall maintain separate records of the specific criteria listed on Schedule 3.8 (each, an "Interconnection Performance Activity") ------------ relating to Interconnection that it provides to itself, its subsidiaries, and Affiliates (the "Providing Party's Interconnection Records") and to other LECs (the "Other LEC Interconnection Records") and parallel records of the Interconnection that the Providing Party provides to the other Party (the "Other Party's Interconnection Records") and shall use the methods described in Schedule 3.8 to calculate Interconnection Performance Activity and determine ------------ compliance with such Interconnection Performance Benchmarks.
To determine a Party's compliance with the Interconnection Performance Benchmarks, each Party shall maintain separate records of the specific criteria listed on SCHEDULE 3.8 (each, an "INTERCONNECTION PERFORMANCE ------------ ACTIVITY") relating to Interconnection that it provides to itself, its subsidiaries, and Affiliates (the "PROVIDING PARTY'S INTERCONNECTION RECORDS") and to other LECs (the "OTHER LEC INTERCONNECTION RECORDS") and parallel records of the Interconnection that the Providing Party provides to the other Party (the "OTHER PARTY'S INTERCONNECTION RECORDS") and shall use the methods described in SCHEDULE 3.8 to calculate Interconnection Performance Activity and ------------ determine compliance with such Interconnection Performance Activity and with such additional criteria to which the Parties may agree upon, including those regarding Ameritech's compliance with different performance levels and intervals requested by Focal and provided by Ameritech pursuant to SECTION 3.6 and a Bona ----------- Fide Request.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
To determine a Party's compliance with the Interconnection Performance Benchmarks, each Party shall maintain separate records of the specific criteria listed on Schedule 3.8 (each, an "Interconnection Performance Activity") relating to Interconnection that it provides to itself, its subsidiaries and Affiliates (the "Providing Party's Interconnection Records") and to other LECs (the "Other LEC Interconnection Records") and parallel records of the Interconnection that the Providing Party provides to the other Party (the "Other Party's Interconnection Records") and shall use the methods described in Schedule 3.8 to calculate Interconnection Performance Activity and determine compliance with such Interconnection Performance Activity and with such additional criteria to which the Parties may agree upon, including those regarding Ameritech's compliance with different performance levels and intervals requested by 21st Century and provided by Ameritech pursuant to Section 3.6 and a Bona Fide Request.
To determine whether the envisaged rebinding of the EC tariff on bananas would result in at least maintaining total market access for MFN banana suppliers, taking into account [all EC WTO market- access commitments relating to bananas].
To determine the services to be created and provided; facilities and equipment required; and the scheduling and assignment of work.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.