Detailed Description of the Project. Provide a detailed description of the scope of the proposed project, including, at a minimum, the type and planned use of real and tangible personal property, the nature of the business, a timeline for property construction or installation, and any other relevant information. Brazos Fork Solar, LLC (Brazos Fork) is requesting an appraised value limitation from Xxxxxxx Consolidated Independent School District (CISD) for the Brazos Fork Project (the “Project”), a proposed solar powered electric generating facility in Xxxxxxx County. The proposed Xxxxxxx CISD Project (this application) will be constructed within the Brazos Fork Reinvestment Zone, estimated to be approximately 12,260 acres, that was created by Xxxxxxx County on November 24th, 2020. A map showing the location of the project is included in TAB 11. The proposed Project is anticipated to have a capacity of approximately 300 MW located in Xxxxxxx CISD. The exact number and location of panels and inverters will vary depending upon ongoing siting analysis, manufacturer’s availability, prices, and the final megawatt generating capacity of the Project when completed. Current estimated plans are to install approximately 850,164 PV modules and 87 inverters with all improvements located in Xxxxxxx CISD. The Applicant requests a value limitation for all facilities and equipment installed for the Project, including; solar modules/panels, tracking equipment, racking and mounting structures, O&M building, substation, inverters boxes, combiner boxes, meteorological equipment, foundations, roadways, paving, fencing, collection system, generation transmission lines, interconnection facilities and all necessary equipment for commercial generation of electricity. Full construction of the Project is anticipated to begin in June of 2022 with completion by December 31, 2023. *NOTE: The map in TAB 11 shows the potential locations of improvements within Xxxxxxx CISD boundaries; however, the final number of panels and inverters and the location of each of these facilities is dependent upon ongoing negotiations with power purchasers and other factors. ATTACHMENT TO APPLICATION FOR APPRAISED VALUE LIMITATION ON QUALIFIED PROPERTY BY BRAZOS FORK SOLAR, LLC TO XXXXXXX CISD Schedule A1: Total Investment for Economic Impact (through the Qualifying Time Period) 1510-haskellcisd-brazosforksolar-amendment002 Date 4/1/2021 Applicant Name Brazos Fork Solar, LLC Form 50-296A ISD Name Xxxxxxx CISD Revised February 2020 PROPERTY INVE...
Detailed Description of the Project. A. Summary of the Project Sanitary landfilling is the dominant method of solid waste disposal in the United States, accounting for about 217 million tons of waste annually (U.S. EPA, 1997). The annual production of municipal solid waste in the United States has more than doubled since 1960. In spite of increasing rates of reuse and recycling, population and economic growth will continue to render landfilling as an important and necessary component of solid waste management. In a Bioreactor Landfill, controlled quantities of liquid are added, and circulated through waste as appropriate, to accelerate the natural biodegradation and composting of solid and liquid waste components. This process significantly increases the biodegradation rate of waste and thus decreases the waste stabilization and composting time (5 to 10 years) relative to what would occur within a conventional landfill (30 years, to 50 years or more). If the waste decomposes (i. e., is composted) in the absence of oxygen (anaerobically), it produces landfill gas (biogas). Biogas is primarily a mixture of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, and VOC's, which are local air pollutants. Methane is also a fuel. This by-product of landfill waste decomposition (composting) can be a substantial renewable energy resource that can be recovered for electricity or other uses. Other benefits of a Bioreactor Landfill composting operation include increased landfill waste settlement and therefore increase in landfill capacity and life, improved opportunities for treatment of leachate liquid that may drain from fractions of the waste, possible reduction of landfill post-closure efforts required, landfill mining, and abatement of greenhouse gases through highly efficient methane capture over a much shorter period of time than is typical of waste management through conventional landfilling.
Detailed Description of the Project. 9 A. Description of the Specific Project Elements 10 1. Model General Permit 10 2. EMS Program 11
Detailed Description of the Project. A. Summary of the Project The EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS) has developed a set of computerized risk screening tools, which have the potential to significantly advance EPA’s pollution prevention objectives by allowing companies to calculate or estimate important risk-related properties based on an analysis of chemical structure. OPPTS uses these tools in the P2 framework to evaluate new chemicals when test data are lacking. OPPTS is also making the tools in the P2 framework available to industry, and demonstrating how they can help design safer chemicals, reduce waste generation, and identify other P2 opportunities. Kodak will pilot the application of and the dissemination of information about the P2 Framework under this Project XL Agreement, as described below.
Detailed Description of the Project. A. What is the P2 Framework? The Agency encourages chemical manufacturers to incorporate health and environmental considerations into product decision making during the development of new chemical substances. EPA has several ongoing initiatives intended to help Stakeholders better assess risk issues during the early stages of product development efforts. Examples include the Design for Environment Program, the Green Chemistry Program, and the P2 Framework, among other programs. Of specific relevance to this Agreement is the P2 Framework as utilized in the development of safer new chemical substances described in PMNs submitted pursuant to Section 5 of TSCA. The P2 Framework is an approach to risk screening that incorporates pollution prevention principles in the design and development of chemical substances. The objective of the P2 Framework approach is to inform decision making at early stages of development and promote the selection and application of safer chemical substances and processes. This approach is implemented by means of a set of computer models that predict risk-related properties of chemical substances using structure activity relationships (SARs), exposure assessment tools and models, and standard (default) scenarios. These models have been developed over a 20-year period by EPA's OPPTS to screen new chemical substances in the absence of data. Annually, EPA evaluates more than 2,000 new chemical substances submitted pursuant to Section 5 of TSCA. TSCA requires that EPA evaluate the chemical substances within 90 days; however, the law does not require that the PMN submitter conduct laboratory tests to evaluate potential hazard and/or risk of the chemical substances. Operating under this time limitation, and often a lack of data, EPA has developed methods to quickly screen chemical substances in the absence of data. The P2 Framework Models listed in Appendix A - P2 Framework Models, reflect the expertise of multiple EPA scientists, grantees, support contractors, as well as others in the scientific community, working for more than 20 years screening chemical substances in the absence of data. The P2 Framework Project presents these 18 models to industry with the hope that the models will be useful in identifying potential problem chemical substances and processes early in the R&D process. The table also provides information regarding the availability of the models. The P2 Framework, as currently constructed, does not address all biological end...
Detailed Description of the Project. A detailed description should be provided in Arial font-12 and written in the space below (not more than 2 pages). It should be clearly explaining the scope of works and activities of both partners (Indonesian and her/his foreign partner researcher). The summary should contain a brief explanation of: 1. Introduction; 2. Objectives; 3. Implementation; 4. Middle to long term Expected impacts; 5. Outputs/Deliverable (joint publications, products, patents, etc); 6. Other benefits (i.e. capacity building, socio- economic benefits) Names and affiliations of other researchers/students to participate in the project (add rows where required) Full name Current Academic Qualification Institution Signatures (All copies submitted should contain the original signature of the submitting Principal Investigator, that of his/her Head of Department as well as the Research Authorising Officer of his/her institution. Principal Investigator Name: Position: Signature: Date: Department Name: Department Head Name: Signature: Date: Research Authorising Officer Name: Signature: Date:
Detailed Description of the Project. A. Description of the Specific Project Elements There are two major elements of this project the model NPDES general permit and the EMS program, including 3rd party audits, that each facility will need to conform to before applying for an NPDES general permit. Another important component of this Project is an expanded industry education and training program that UEP will implement. The expanded industry education and training program is designed to assist individual egg producers develop effective EMSs, effectively manage nutrients, and effective management of litter generated by UEP facilities by 3rd party users.
Detailed Description of the Project. A. Summary of the Project The Gold Track tier will offer the greatest operational/regulatory flexibilities and require the greatest environmental commitments from participants in the NJDEP’s Silver and Gold Track Program. For Gold Track participation, regulated entities will be required to meet set core eligibility requirements above and beyond those required for Silver Track and Silver Track II. These eligibility requirements are explained in detail below. Gold Track will be conducted initially as a pilot program and will be limited to no more than nine participants. The additional requirements for Gold Track participation include: establishment and implementation of an environmental management system and community outreach program prior to acceptance into Gold Track, and a willingness to commit to further specific environmental actions that are commensurate to the flexibilities granted for each media, as appropriate. These environmental actions are described in the attached media- specific Addenda. Participating facilities will negotiate covenants with NJDEP following their acceptance into Gold Track. These covenants, while of no legal effect and not enforceable, will reflect the commitments made by the Gold Track participants and the concomitant flexibilites offered by the Department. The Department recognizes that certain regulatory changes may be necessary to authorize it to enter into these covenants. The Department also recognizes that existing permits may have to be modified to carry out the terms of the covenants. Regulatory changes will be accomplished through the rulemaking process governed by N.J.S.A 52:14B-1 et seq.; permit modifications will be made in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. See Section III. G, below. Regulatory changes and permit modifications must be consistent with applicable federal and state law.
Detailed Description of the Project. This project is a joint collaboration between prpl Foundation and Broadband Forum with the objective to develop an open source and portable carrier-grade infrastructure necessary to maintain the delivery of provided services through the whole in-home (full coverage) towards mobile and fixed terminals with the required quality and through user- owned/managed devices. In order to achieve this objective, the project is divided into two main parts: • Part 1: Development of a MAP/EasyMesh framework i.e. an open source version of a WFA´s EasyMesh Release 1, based on BBF´s IEEE 1905.1/1a stack. The objectives are: o Produce an open-source reference implementation of WFA’s Multi-AP Specification, Agent and Controller, with permissive licensing to meet the following goals: ▪ Compliant with WFA’s test procedures (including CAPI) • Agent (fully-featured AP) • Controller (rudimentary SW, but still compliant) • Data Elements (stretch goal) • Release 2 of Multi-AP (on the radar for 2019) ▪ Suitable for OEMs and other developers to easily integrate into various product platforms • e.g., Linux-based platforms (e.g., prplWRT and RDK-B) with Wi-Fi chips from most any SoC vendor • e.g., Residential gateways, and Wi-Fi extender devices, either in retail or from service provider ▪ Extensible by OEMs and other developers for product differentiation • e.g., Controller SW with proprietary IP algorithms making intelligent decisions for the Multi-AP network ▪ Suitable for BBF and other developers to extend upon • e.g., Carrier-grade manageability, with data models for home networks with multiple APs, etc… • Part 2: Development of a full carrier grade MAP solution based on WFA´s EasyMesh open-source solution. The main objective of this part is to develop: o Management interfaces towards service provider to allow the operators to manage the MAP framework within the larger network (e.g., Management models, management architecture, etc..) o Any functionality identified by BBF to integrate the solution into an end-to- end carrier-grade operator network (e.g., increasing coverage, linking QoS to the rest of the system, diagnosis and metrics acquisition) o Any additional functionality defined by WFA not implemented in Part 1. o Test plan(s) development (in addition to WFA´s tests) to check if implementation cover operator´s needs o While there is a dependency between Part 1 and Part 2 (Part 2 code will be built on top of Part 1 code), the execution of both parts is not sequential. It is e...
Detailed Description of the Project. The Project involves the development of a new wave energy facility in Humboldt County, California. The following table summarizes the substantive features of the PPA: 1 As provided by D.00-00-000, the Commission must approve the PPA and payments to be made thereunder, and find that the procurement will count toward PG&E’s RPS procurement obligations, for the executed PPA to be binding on the parties. Advice 3181-E - 3 - December 18, 2007 Generating Facility Type Term Years MW Capacity Annual Deliveries Commercial Operating Date Project Location Finavera Wave 15 2 MW ~4 GWh December 1, 2012 Humboldt County, California A copy of the PPA is provided in Confidential Appendix G and an explanation of the contract, including confidential terms, is provided in Confidential Appendix D. The Project will serve as a demonstration for a specific type of wave technology, the hydraulic pump buoy system. Energy transfer takes place by converting the vertical component of wave kinetic energy into pressurized seawater by means of two-stroke hose pumps. Pressurized seawater is directed into a conversion system consisting of a turbine driving an electrical generator. The power is transmitted to shore by means of a secure, undersea transmission line.
