Narrative. Commentary covering site improvements, circulation, organization of building space in relation to program requirements, building materials, special features, building systems (HVAC, plumbing, fire protection, structural, security, and video voice and data).
Narrative. This section should include firm’s philosophy, approach(s) and preferred methods for meeting requirements, deliverables, and the aforementioned services listed in the Scope of Services. Provide the greatest amount of meaning detail possible to describe the proposed products and/or services. Indicate if your firm can meet the specifications, or if the specifications can be met only under certain conditions or circumstances. If your firm is not able to meet the specification, briefly explain why, noting any concerns or issues Xxxxxxx County should be aware of. Provide a timeline indicating deliverables, vendor responsibilities and resources needed from Xxxxxxx County. Merely reiterating the specifications are strongly discouraged, as they do not provide insight into the firm’s ability to meet the specifications.
Narrative. Offerors shall provide a narrative for each past performance example. The narrative shall describe the contract listed, the contract objectives achieved, and how the contract is relevant to the requirements of this solicitation.
Narrative. For purposes of understanding the scope of services required through this contract, the agency owns and requests full service maintenance on the following twenty-seven (27) MFD, located in New Hampshire areas only. Copiers may be move to different locations within state during this contract, but will always remain in New Hampshire. Equipment may be viewed by appointment only Location Model Serial # Meter Reading 3-31-2022 Berlin Kyocera Mita 2560 QAS0908888 150,921 Berlin Kyocera Mita 420i F/P QWG0806854 931056 Claremont Kyocera Mita 2560 QAS0908887 133,321 Claremont Kyocera Mita 420i F/P QWG0806881 564,083 Colebrook Kyocera Mita 1650 F/P AGK3111342 317,716 Concord Kyocera Mita 1650 F/P AGK3111340 142,937 Concord Kyocera Mita 2050 AGJ3117310 472,276 Concord Kyocera Mita 2050 F/P AGH3081152 237,191 Concord Kyocera Mita 1650 F/P AGK3081297 430,588 Concord Kyocera Mita 2050 AGJ3130009 265,788 Concord Kyocera Mita 1650 F/P AGK3077410 294,844 Concord Kyocera Mita 2560/P QAS0908889 527,390 Concord Kyocera Mita 2560/F QAS0908897 807,385 Concord Kyocera Mita 420i F/P QWG0X08443 530,146 Xxxxxx Kyocera Mita 420i F/P QWG0Y09128 518,393 Xxxxxx Kyocera Mita 2560 QAS0908885 111,744 Keene Kyocera Mita 2560/P QAS0708323 256,850 Laconia Kyocera Mita 2560/P QAS0908896 288,086 Laconia Kyocera Mita 420i F/P QWG0806865 973,715 Littleton Kyocera Mita 2560/P QAS0908892 91,044 Manchester Kyocera Mita 2560 QAS0608113 349,680 Nashua Kyocera Mita 2560 QAS0608112 79,141 Portsmouth Kyocera Mita 2560 QAS0908875 343,552 Portsmouth Kyocera Mita 420i F/P QWG0806851 970,101 Salem Kyocera Mita 420i F/P QWG0806846 658,441 Salem Kyocera Mita 2560 QAS0908886 145,811 Somersworth Kyocera Mita 2560/P QAS0908884 371,279 MINIMUM FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE SERVICE This full service maintenance contract will be awarded to the lowest-priced bidder offering to meet or exceed all of the following minimum functional requirements:
Narrative. DUE DILIGENCE AND PROPER USE: The development allowed by the lease has occurred. It is recommended that the lease be kept in force. PROPER USE: The leased premises are being used in accordance with the lease agreement. ADEQUATE INSURANCE AND BOND COVERAGE: The lessee has been asked to provide proof of adequate insurance coverage. The lease allows the Trust to require a bond at any time, or to require additional bonding as may be in the best interest of the beneficiary. No performance and reclamation bond is currently in place, which has been determined to be adequate for the current risks associated with the lessee’s current uses. WATER RIGHTS AND XXXXX: There are no Trust-owned water rights associated with this lease. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE: The property was inspected and reviewed for environmental compliance on May 26, 2021. The lease inspection indicated it would be rated as low risk. There is no evidence of underground petroleum storage tanks, stained soil, unauthorized uses, or solid waste on the premises. All oil and gas containers are being properly stored. The site appears clean and orderly. The complete inspection report will be added to the lease file. FINANCIAL/REVENUE The lease agreement provides for periodic increases in the annual base rental amount. Pursuant to the lease agreement, it is recommended that the annual base rental be increased from $720.00 per year to $770.00 per year based on a Consumer Price Index ("CPI") adjustment, effective October 1, 2021. A certified notice was sent informing the lessee of this action. An analysis of comparable parcels and rental rates in the area show that these adjusted rentals meet market value. Based on this analysis, it has been determined that an appraisal is not warranted and that adjustments should be based on CPI. The existing lease is currently considered the highest and best use of a parcel of this type of land. SUMMARY The annual rental for SULA 1641 has been increased from $720.00 to $770.00, effective October 1, 2021. The next three-year (Continued) THREE-YEAR REVIEW - SULA 1641 - AGRICULTURE review will be completed by October 1, 2024. TYPE OF RECORD: APPROVAL THREE-YEAR REVIEW - SULA 1549 - INDUSTRIAL DA Date: 06/14/2021 Status: Approved by Xxxxx Xxx Department: Surface Drafted By: Xxxxx, Xxx ID: 6649 CONTRACT DETAILS Name: EOG RESOURCES INC Address: REGULATORY DEPARTMENT 000 00XX XXXXXX, XXX 0000X XXXXXX, XX 00000 Administrator: Xxxxx, Xxx County: Uintah Total acres: 640.0000 Start Date...
Narrative. 1.1 Information
Narrative. The purpose of this MOU/Agreement is to establish a formal working relationship between the Parties to this MOU/Agreement: and to set forth the operative conditions, which will govern this partnership. SUPERINTENDENT and EMPLOYING AGENCY will form a partnership in providing and coordinating services as part of the Center for Teacher Innovation Induction Program, hereafter referred to as SUPERINTENDENT’S CTI Induction Programs, the program sponsor for the Riverside County Office of Education’s Center for Teacher Innovation Induction Programs (CTI Induction Program). Each new participating teacher (Candidate) is embarking on a professional development journey in this next phase of their teaching career. The intent of induction is to support and develop new teachers during their first years in the profession leading to increased competence and retention. With a trained Reflective Coach, who functions as a mentor/teacher, the Candidate will reflect on their teaching practice and student learning. Each Candidate will meet an average of one hour per week with their Reflective Coach, engage in reflective conversations and classroom observations, and receive high impact feedback. All induction activities are embedded completely in each Candidate’s current teaching assignments, and thus are intended to solely enhance each Candidate’s professional experience and growth. The induction process, a carefully thought out and systematic approach to teacher development, is also inherently individualized. The Center for Teacher Innovation’s Teacher Induction Program will authentically facilitate and enhance supportive and meaningful professional growth experiences for all teachers participating in the program.
Narrative. CMR shall include with its monthly update to the Master Project Schedule, a Schedule Narrative Report containing a narrative that includes the following:
Narrative. State below in reasonable detail why Forms 00-X, 00-X, 00-X, 00-X, 10-D, N-SAR, N-CSR, or the transition report or portion thereof, could not be filed within the prescribed time period. Tech Data Corporation (the Company”) has determined that it is unable to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the year ended January 31, 2013 within the prescribed time period because it requires additional time to complete the required financial statements and restatement described below. The Company cannot predict when it will complete the restatement, but expects that it will do so beyond the permitted 15-day extension of the prescribed due date of April 1, 2013. On March 21, 2013, the Company disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K that the Audit Committee of its Board of Directors, on the recommendation of management, and after consultation with the Company's independent accountants, Ernst & Young LLP, concluded that the Company would be required to restate some or all of its previously issued quarterly and audited annual financial statements for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 and some or all of the quarters of fiscal year 2013, including the financial statements in the Company’s fourth quarter and fiscal year 2013 earnings release dated March 4, 2013. The Company anticipates that the restatement will be made to correct improprieties primarily related to how the Company's U.K. subsidiary reflected vendor accounting.
Narrative. This range improvement is in compliance with R850-50-1100(5)(a) and (b). The project does enhance the value of the resources pursuant to R850-50-1100(5)(c). FINANCIAL/REVENUE Estimated cost/value of the project is $49,670.00 with $12,417.50 being provided by the applicant and the remaining portion provided by GIP and the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration ("SITLA"). The applicant’s portion will be amortized as shown below. Following is a flat-rate amortization schedule using the Natural Resources Conservation Service ("NRCS") schedule for this project, should XXXXX cancel the grazing permit before these improvements are fully amortized. If the permittee sells or allows the permit to expire or to be canceled due to his own actions, then the amortization schedule will be canceled. Only the applicant’s contributions towards the associated project costs will be amortized. PROJECT: Three (3) spring developments PROJECT COST: $5,155.00 PROJECT LIFE: 50 years YEAR COMPLETED: 2020 YEARLY AMORTIZED DEDUCTION: $103.10 YEAR FULLY AMORTIZED: 2070 PROJECT: Three (3) pipelines PROJECT COST: $3,937.50 PROJECT LIFE: 20 years YEAR COMPLETED: 2020 YEARLY AMORTIZED DEDUCTION: $196.88 YEAR FULLY AMORTIZED: 2040 PROJECT: Tire Troughs PROJECT COST: $3,325.00 PROJECT LIFE: 20 years YEAR COMPLETED: 2020 YEARLY AMORTIZED DEDUCTION: $166.25 YEAR FULLY AMORTIZED: 2040 SUMMARY RIP 850 was approved to develop three (3) new springs with three (3) pipelines and multiple troughs with the associated amortization schedule. TYPE OF RECORD: APPROVAL DA Date: 08/24/2020 Status: Approved by Xxxxx Xxx Department: Surface Drafted By: Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx ID: 5569 CONTRACT DETAILS Name: XXXXXXX & XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX Address: 000 X. 000 X P.O. BOX 600071 PARAGONAH, UT 84760 Administrator: Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx County: Iron Total acres: 20.00 Beneficiary: School LAND PARCELS (GIS Review of Description: 05/19/2020) T31S, R9W, SLB&M Section 36: S2SE4NE4 (WITHIN) 20.00 acres BACKGROUND REQUESTED/PROPOSED ACTION: The applicant proposes to reconstruct a pond and spring development with associated trough and pipeline. The applicant submitted a proposal for this range improvement project on May 19, 2020. The applicant is doing 100% of the project. The project was not submitted to the Resource Development Coordinating Committee (RDCC") because the project is a re- construction of improvements that already exist. The Trust's archaeological staff has verified that clearance was completed. There is a...
