Discussion Sample Clauses

Discussion. The parties are agreed that discussion and communication on matters of mutual concern between employees or the Union and Departments of employment shall be encouraged, recognizing that the format of these discussions will vary from Department to Department.

Discussion. For minor offenses by an employee, management has a responsibility to discuss such matters with the employee. Discussions of this type shall be held in private between the employee and the supervisor. Such discussions are not considered discipline and are not grievable. Following such discussions, there is no prohibition against the supervisor and/ or the employee making a personal notation of the date and subject matter for their own personal record(s). However, no notation or other information pertaining to such discussion shall be included in the employee’s personnel folder. While such discussions may not be cited as an element of prior adverse record in any subsequent disciplinary action against an employee, they may be, where relevant and timely, relied upon to establish that employees have been made aware of their obligations and responsibilities.

Discussion. Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

Discussion. 11.1 It is the intent of both parties to maintain an open line of communication for the betterment of employer-employee relations. Any issue not pertaining to grievances or grievable issues may be discussed by AMEA or ANAHEIM at either party’s request. 11.2 A party requesting a discussion may orally or in writing notify the other party of the subject to be discussed. Thereafter, a meeting shall be promptly arranged at which meeting not more than two (2) AMEA members and the business manager or business representative of AMEA may be present. 11.3 If the parties are not able to resolve the issues after three (3) meetings, the issues will be considered dropped, unless both parties agree to meet additional times. 11.4 If the discussion process results in an agreement between the City Management Representative and AMEA to amend this MOU, such agreement shall be incorporated in a written Letter of Understanding (hereinafter “▇▇▇”), signed by the City Management Representative and AMEA representatives. The matters incorporated in the Letter of Understanding shall be presented to the City Council, or its statutory representative, for determination.

Discussion. Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to the applicable policies of the MPS and are of the opinion that the proposal is consistent with all applicable policies. The following matters have been identified for more detailed discussion. Staff are of the opinion that the scale of development proposed is consistent with the intent of the Village designation given that the buildings on the same side of the highway are used for commercial uses and are relatively similar in style and contain a mix of front façades. The proposed addition to the Home Hardware store will not substantially change the look of the existing store particularly as the front façade of the store (Schedule B of Attachment A) will be consistent with the current design and colour of the building. Also, the addition will be used as a foyer for the existing building, therefore, staff have no concerns with the adequacy of the on-site services. The proposed parking area includes 9 vehicular parking spaces including one barrier free space. The existing parking conditions are similar to that being proposed with the driveway access to the site remaining open to Highway #7 along its full frontage. This parking and access arrangement has functioned well over the years and is intended to remain unchanged. The parking standards of the LUB would require a minimum of 35 parking spaces for the building if the project was an as-of-right application. However, staff feels that this parking requirement is unnecessary in this case given that this business has operated at this location for many years without parking or traffic conflict. It is not anticipated that the new 490 square foot store front addition will generate vehicular traffic flows to this destination beyond pre-existing levels. It should also be noted that the site of the future Home Hardware property at ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ #▇ (Map 2) was one of the sites utilized for occasional parking overflow; however, this site cannot be used for parking overflow under the development agreement approved by Council on September 28, 2011. There are other parking areas within very close proximity to the site. This includes a vacant lot across the street that is owned by the Developer and a community parking area to the east beside the existing Home Hardware Store and behind the RBC building. These areas are currently utilized by the community for parking purposes. Nova Scotia Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal (NSTIR) have issued a “Work Within Highway Right-of-...

Discussion. The Companies mutually desire that friendly collaboration will continue between them. Accordingly, they will try, and they will cause their respective Group members to try, to resolve in an amicable manner all disagreements and misunderstandings connected with their respective rights and obligations under this Agreement, including any amendments hereto. In furtherance thereof, in the event of any dispute or disagreement (a “Dispute”) between any member of the Pfizer Group and any member of the Zoetis Group as to the interpretation of any provision of this Agreement or the performance of obligations hereunder, the Tax departments of the Companies shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the Dispute.

Discussion. Staff have reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the Halifax MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

Discussion. If it is necessary to provide for any matter that is not expressly set forth in this Agreement, the determination shall be made through discussion between the Parties.

Discussion. Where the College has notified the Union of the intended technological change, the parties undertake to meet within the next thirty (30) days to discuss potential problems and attempt to reach agreement which will minimize the impact of such technological change on employees affected thereby.