Grievance Mechanism. Service Provider is responsible for the implementation and monitoring of the Code of Ethics (Attachment 2). Service Provider shall immediately report any allegations of suspicions of violations of Funding Terms and Conditions (including the Policy on Environmental and Social Safeguards, Prohibited Practices and Code of Ethics available at xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/gef/about) or other Project related grievances. Grievances will be addressed in accordance with the grievance mechanism described in the Project Environmental and Social Management Framework or CI-GEF’s Mechanism for Integrity-Related Grievances, as applicable. Service Provider shall ensure that all of its employees, sub-contractors and sub- grantees are informed of Grantor’s grievance mechanism at xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or via phone to a local dial-in number displayed at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx (“CI Ethics Hotline”). CI will promptly investigate any grievances submitted to the CI Ethics Hotline. CI will treat complaints as confidential to the extent possible, with the understanding that confidentiality may not be maintained where identification is required by law or to enable CI or law enforcement to conduct an adequate investigation. Service Provider shall not retaliate against any employee or other person who submit such grievances in good faith. Retaliation is subject to termination of this Agreement and other sanctions, including ineligibility of Service Provider to submit future proposals to CI for GEF- related activities. Service Provider hereby expressly binds itself to include language substantially reflecting the terms of this provision in all sub-contracts and sub-awards issued under this Agreement.
Grievance Mechanism. The LL does not foresee grievance mechanisms as mandatory practice, but provides for judicial protection of employees in case of unfair or unlawful employment relationship practices instead. Any employee may refer to trade union or other representative labor organization for help in handling any disciplinary or grievance action. The Employer should not prevent any project worker from seeking assistance or advice in such situations. The Law on Peaceful Settlement of Labor Disputes allows for settlement of both individual and collective grievances and claims arising from the employment relationship and work situations without referring to judiciary through mediation of mediators and arbiters and agreement of the parties involved. On the contrary, the Serbian legislation relating to prevention of discrimination, sexual harassment and abuse at work and combating corruption is much more specific and is aligned with the above stated requests laying out clear procedures to be followed in any case of discriminatory actions, unjust treatment or concerns over non‐compliance with the law. The above stated mechanisms provided by the Serbian legislation are considered as minimum standard to be achieved in addressing labour dissatisfaction and perceived maltreatment. Any third party employing and engaging contracted workers are expected to design and implement grievance mechanisms that will be aligned or surpass this standard ensuring an easy access to protective measures and effective remedial actions in work situations that may give rise to grievances and disputes. For direct workers employed or engaged by MAFWM, excluding civil servants, a special GM shall be conceived and housed by the PIU within MAFWM. This GM shall both serve as workplace and dispute resolution instrument for direct workers and contracted workers in case that no GM exists with the third parties employing or engaging them. Grievance mechanisms should address workplace concerns specifying procedures as to whom a project worker should lodge the grievance, the time frame for receiving a response or feedback and steps to refer to a more senior level, while allowing for transparency, confidentiality and non‐retribution practices The mechanism should foresee the procedure that at least: Specifies to whom the employee should lodge the grievance; Refers to the time frame allowed for the grievance to be dealt with; Allows the employee to refer to a more senior level within the organization if the grie...
Grievance Mechanism. We have dedicated grievance mechanisms. Please contact us and provide all relevant information via the most appropriate mechanism below to reach the right support team directly and help us respond promptly. If you contact us via any other means, it may take us longer to receive and review your request.
Grievance Mechanism. In case of any Grievance of the Complainant sent in a written communication to the Company at any of the touch points as mentioned, shall be addressed within T+14 days of the receipt of the complaint. Please find the below escalation matrix: Step1 Call us at: 000000000 Email us at: xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Step2 If you do not receive any resolution to your complaint within T+14 or if the response is not as per your expectations please feel free to contact our Grievance Redressal Officer Email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Step3 If you are not satisfied with the response of the GRO, you may write to the Chief Grievance Redressal Officer at or send a communication to: Email - Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Address : Edelweiss General Insurance Company Limited , Edelweiss House ,Off CST Road, Xxxxxx, Mumbai 400098 Step 4 If you are not satisfied with the response or do not receive a response from us within 14 days, you may approach the Grievance Cell of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (‘IRDAI’) on the following contact details: IRDAI Grievance Call Centre (IGCC) TOLL FREE NO: 155255 Email ID: xxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx Register online at: xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxx.xx/ Address for communication for complaints by fax/paper: Consumer Affairs Department Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India Sy. No. 115/1, Financial District Nanakramguda, Gachibowli Hyderabad – 500032
Grievance Mechanism. Service Provider is responsible for the implementation and monitoring of the Code of Ethics in (Attachment 2). Service Provider shall immediately report any allegations or suspicions of violations of the Code of Ethics or Agreement terms related to corruption, fraud or anti-competitive practice; fund from illicit origin or other Project-related grievances. Grievances will be addressed in accordance with the CI’s established grievance mechanism. Service Provider shall ensure that all of its employees, sub-contractors and sub-grantees are informed of CI’s grievance mechanism at xxx.xx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx or via phone to a local dial-in number displayed at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx (“CI Ethics Hotline”). CI will promptly investigate any grievances submitted to the CI Ethics Hotline. CI will treat complaints as confidential to the extent possible, with the understanding that confidentiality may not be maintained where identification is required by law or to enable CI or law enforcement to conduct an adequate investigation. Service Provider shall not retaliate against any employee or other person who submit such grievances in good faith. Retaliation is subject to termination of this Agreement and other sanctions, including ineligibility of Service Provider to submit future proposals to CI for CEPF-related activities.
Grievance Mechanism. (a) The Parties agree that any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or related to the implementation of the Project shall first be submitted to the grievance mechanism established by the Project and handled by the Project Steering Committee (PSC).
Grievance Mechanism. In case you have any complaint / grievance, you may approach our office at any of the following address or e-mail us at xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx:
Grievance Mechanism. A growing body of work focuses on IFIs and human rights; specifically, it focuses on how the agreements that these institutions make influence human rights. The two prominent publications are Abouharb and Cingranelli (2009) and Abouharb and Cingranelli (2006) – both of which focus on how IMF or World Bank programs respectively influence human rights outcomes. Abouharb and Cingranelli (2009) focus primarily on the relationship between the length of time a government was under an IMF program and changes in its respect for human rights, finding that a longer tenure under such a program led to increased government use of torture and extrajudicial killings. 1xxxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=22256LangID=E However, this work is sparse in terms of theory and does not posit we might observe these results specifically. The key explanatory mechanisms offered by Abouharb and Cingranelli is that IMF loans could have caused greater repression by either reducing the government’s reliance on its citizens for tax revenue, raising the ire of citizens who believe that their government is beholden to foreign powers, or a relative deprivation argument in the vein of Xxxx (1970), wherein citizens’ expectations about what they are entitled to (increased by the expected benefits of an IMF package) are not met by the government. Abouharb and Cingranelli’s book on the same topic does little to elucidate this argument, focusing on case studies and positing the same basic mechanisms as their papers (Abouharb and Cingranelli 2007). The net result is that the authors argue against submitting to the will of these enormous financial bodies. Here, then, is one potential argument and causal mechanism: being under an IFI (IMF) agreement could increase grievances and drive protests or riots. Another issue that the authors raise, but do not satisfactorily address in this author’s view, is the IMF reforms of the late 1990s. These reforms are cited in the paper as the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC) in 1996 and Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) in 1999. The authors indicate that they expect to see a result of these changes in terms of human rights. However, Abouharb and Cingranelli’s dataset only ranges from 1981 to 2003 – a short time period in which to expect major effects. It is not surprising that the authors did not find a positive relationship between IMF grants and human rights when examining such a short window after the suppos...
Grievance Mechanism d. Resident’s reasonable due process rights for cases of a suspension, non-renewal, non-promotion, or dismissal regardless of when action is taken during the appointment period;
Grievance Mechanism. 8. The Project Implementing Entity shall maintain, throughout Project implementation, and publicize the availability of a grievance mechanism, in form and substance satisfactory to the World Bank, to hear and determine fairly and in good faith all complaints raised in relation to the Project, and take all measures necessary to implement the determinations made by such mechanism in a manner satisfactory to the World Bank.
