Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. (UK) LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (‘SRA’). The SRA is the independent regulatory body of the Law Society of England and Wales, and operates within the regulatory framework of the Legal Services Xxx 0000 (and any subsequent amendments).
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. In general, no part of any fence or wall shall be constructed or placed within the “front yard” of any numbered lot in the subdivision, that is to say, within that part of the lot that lies between the line of the street on which the lot abuts and the required setback from the front line of the lot. No fence or wall shall be constructed or placed within that part of any lot that is contiguous to the lake that lies within 25 feet of the shoreline of the lake and no part of any fence or wall constructed or placed in the “rear yard” of any lot that is contiguous to the lake shall exceed four feet in height. Any fence that is permitted within the subdivision and is not subject to the height limitation set out in the immediately preceding sentence may have a height not in excess of six feet; provided, however, that every permitted fence in the subdivision that exceeds four feet in height shall be of ch ain link or open construction. Xxxxxx shall not exceed five feet in height and shall not obstruct lake view of abutting lot owners. Hedge placement in the rear lot shall be governed by the same rules as for fences.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. 5. Notwithstanding the procedures set forth above, after the start of the school year, any newly-created or vacated Special Education Assistant position shall be posted and filled accordingly:
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. Article 36: Discipline and Dismissal; which are superseded and replaced by the following:
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. Section 2. The City shall post a seniority list once every twelve (12) months showing the City, division and classification seniority of each employee. A copy of the seniority list shall be furnished to the Union. Any objections to the posted seniority list or the one furnished to the Union must be presented to the City within thirty (30) calendar days of the posted date, excepting that, employees on vacation, sick leave or other approved leave of absence at the time the seniority list is posted shall have ten (10) calendar days after return from such leave to file an objection to his supervisor. In the event no objections are filed within the time limits specified in this Section, the seniority shall be deemed valid and acceptable.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. Enclosures:
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. For purposes of this Article, aggregate hours shall mean hours actually worked. Seniority Accumulation
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. 21.3.1 Seniority shall be considered broken, all rights forfeited, and there shall be no obligation to rehire upon termination as per Article 12: Employment Termination.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. 1. Loss of Xxxxxx paid by the Insured or any Insured Person resulting from any Kidnap.
Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. On October 13, 2006, the parties entered into a Tolling and Standstill Agreement (the "Tolling Agreement") which, among other things, provides for a standstill of claims or potential claims between or among the parties to the FHG Action. Pursuant to the Tolling Agreement, on October 24, 2006, this action was dismissed without prejudice and the governing statutes of limitation were tolled with respect to any claims, counterclaims and defenses asserted in the FHG Action. The Tolling Agreement also provides that FHG shall not bring any claims asserted in the FHG Action (or any substantially similar claims) against GFC, Third Aircraft, GFAC, or Messrs. Xxxxxx or Xxxxxx until the conclusion of GFAC's action against Airbus pending in the Supreme Court of the State and County of New York (the "Airbus Action") described below. In the event that GFC or Third Aircraft seek and are permitted to intervene in the Airbus Action, FHG can seek to amend its intervenor's complaint in this action to include claims against GFC or Third Aircraft, including claims made in the FHG Action, but GFC and Third Aircraft can oppose any such effort by FHG. The Tolling Agreement does not resolve the merits or liability for (or against) any claims nor require payment of any monetary compensation by any party to another party. In connection with the Tolling Agreement, FHG and Messrs. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx, as directors of GFAC, executed an agreement which provides, among other things, that FHG would take the lead role in litigating the Airbus Action and would fund all fees, costs and expenses of the litigation other than those fees, costs and expenses incurred by GFAC at the direction, or related to the depositions, of Messrs. Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx. On October 10, 2005, GFAC filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State and County of New York against Airbus alleging (1) that Airbus' termination of the GFAC Agreement was wrongful and a material breach and repudiation by Airbus of the GFAC Agreement; (2) that Airbus, by retaining PDPs paid by GFAC under the GFAC Agreement, unjustly enriched itself at GFAC's expense; (3) that Airbus breached an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing to GFAC; and (4) that the liquidated damages provision in the GFAC Agreement is unenforceable as a penalty. The complaint seeks restitution and damages in an unspecified amount in the "millions of dollars." On December 7, 2005, FHG, acting by the FHG Liquidators, filed a motion seeking permission to intervene ...
