Proposal Details. The applicant proposes to amend the existing development agreement to replace the multiple unit dwelling permitted on the southern portion of the site with a townhouse development. The proposed townhouses would be a cluster development, and the subject site would not be subdivided. Townhouse clusters are permitted by the existing development agreement; however, an amendment is required to change the permitted use on this specific subject site. The applicant is also requesting the following amendments to the design criteria for townhouse clusters on this site in the existing development agreement: • Reduce the minimum width of each townhouse unit; and • Remove requirements for individual driveways and garages. If the amendment is approved, the number of single-unit dwellings, two-unit dwellings and townhouse units permitted in Sub-Area 5 would not change. Enabling Policy and LUB Context The development agreement is enabled by Policy BW-20 (b) of the Bedford Municipal Planning Strategy, and the criteria for Council’s consideration are provided in Policy BW-32 of the Bedford MPS (Attachment B). Case 22980: Development Agreement 000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxx North West Community Council Report - 3 - June 14, 2021 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT The community engagement process is consistent with the intent of the HRM Community Engagement Strategy. The level of community engagement was consultation, achieved through providing information and seeking comments through the HRM case webpage, and signage posted on the subject site. From June 23, 2020, when the case webpage was published, to April 20, 2021, the case webpage received 405 pageviews, of which 325 were unique pageviews. Additionally, 177 post cards were mailed to property owners within the notification area, and a virtual public information meeting was held on December 10, 2020. Five people attended the virtual public information meeting; attachment C contains a summary of the meeting. Public comments received included the following topics: • Clarification on the process; • Concern that sufficient parking be provided on site; and • Requests that trees on the site be maintained as much as possible. A public hearing must be held by North West Community Council before it can consider approving the proposed amending development agreement. Should Community Council decide to proceed with a public hearing on this application, in addition to the published newspaper advertisements, property owners within the notification area...
Proposal Details. On March 16, 2021, an application to amend the existing agreement was made to allow for an extension to the construction commencement and completion dates. Although the existing agreement allows for a time extension as a non-substantive amendment, which would only require a resolution of Council, this request must be made at least 60 days before the expiry of the commencement of development time period. Since the request was not received within this timeframe, it must be considered as a substantive amendment to the agreement, and a new public hearing to consider the amendment must be held. Enabling Policy and LUB Context The subject site is in the Planning Districts 14 & 17 Plan Area, and is within the RLVC (River-Lakes Village Centre) designation (Map 1) of the Municipal Planning Strategy (MPS) and the VG (Village Gateway) Zone (Map 2) of the Land Use By-law (LUB). Within the plan area, Policy P-68 allows Council to consider permitting new multiple-unit dwellings by development agreement within any designation on properties serviced by oversize septic tanks and fields or private sewage treatment plants which were in existence prior to the effective date of the MPS. The Inn on the Lake property is serviced by an existing private sewage treatment plant and therefore a new multi-unit dwelling is enabled by policy. Additionally, the proposal is Case 23495: Amending Development Agreement 0000 Xxxxxxx 0, Xxxx Xxxxx North West Community Council Report - 3 - August 9, 2021 subject to the general policy evaluation criteria as contained in Policy P-155, which is applicable to all discretionary planning approvals under the MPS. These policies which the project was originally approved under in 2015 are still in effect, and the original policy framework continues to apply to the development. The request for an amendment must be consistent with these policies. Attachment B of this report contains the policies and criteria by which Council may consider this proposal, and also contains staff analysis of whether the requested change puts the proposal out of alignment with these policies.
Proposal Details. The applicant proposes to enter into a development agreement to expand an existing child care centre at 0000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxx. The request is enabled by the Halifax Municipal Planning Strategy (MPS) under Policy 3.20. The expansion would increase the number of children in care from 14 to 20. Child care is provided on the main floor of the dwelling and the outdoor play area is in the rear yard which is a separate, abutting property. The applicants are the primary residents of the dwelling with living areas on the second and third floor. The building also contains a non-conforming second dwelling unit in the basement. The apartment suite existed prior to the current owners purchasing the building. No changes to the exterior of the building have been proposed in association with this development application. Enabling Policy and LUB Context Under the Halifax Peninsula MPS, the subject site is designated Residential Environments and zoned R-1 (Single Family Zone). The R-1 Zone allows a variety of uses including detached one-family dwellings, offices of professionals, home occupations, and child care centres for not more than 14 children in conjunction with a dwelling. Halifax MPS Implementation Policy 3.20 enables child care centres which would not meet the applicable land use by-law regulations to be considered by development agreement as follows: In order to encourage the establishment of child care centres in a variety of locations to meet the varied needs of families, and to allow the consideration of the specific circumstances of an individual location, a child care centre which does not meet applicable land use bylaw regulations may be permitted by development agreement. Implementation Policy 3.20.1 provides the criteria which Council needs to consider when reviewing applications for development agreements for child care centres.
Proposal Details. 2.1 It is proposed that the Council agrees the Joint Statement of Intent and begins to explore collaborative opportunities with South Lakeland District Council and Xxxxxx Borough Council, focusing on achieving clear economic and other benefits for the district and beyond.
Proposal Details. The applicant proposes to enter into a development agreement to permit a service station, convenience store, restaurant and car wash. Schedule B of Attachment A shows the proposed site plan for the development. Lot A-1 (000 Xxxxxxxx Xxxx) is where the structures and parking are to be located. Lot A-2 is the area of the subject site used for driveway access. The major aspects of the proposal are as follows:
Proposal Details. The applicant wishes to enter into a development agreement to permit senior citizen housing to accommodate 7 residents within the existing dwelling at 00 Xxxxxx Xxxxx. In addition to the residential accommodation space, the proposal would also enable supporting housekeeping and personal care services with provision to lodge a maximum of 2 overnight staff. The existing building has a main floor kitchen, dining room and sitting room, with five bedrooms. There is a bathroom off each bedroom and one full washroom with bathing facilities on the main floor. The upper floor contains a staff bedroom, office, and two more bedrooms. Meals, laundry service and housekeeping services are provided to residents by up to 2 staff members. History of Building Use The building was constructed as a single unit dwelling in the 1990’s as part of the Kingswood Subdivision. Through the issuance of the necessary municipal permits, an addition to the dwelling to accommodate several bedrooms and a common living space was completed in 2002. The authorized permits indicate the use of the building to be a single unit dwelling. Recently, staff became aware that the dwelling was being used as senior citizen housing. As this type of use is not permitted within the applied R-1 (Single Unit Dwelling) Zone, a municipal compliance case was opened. The compliance process resulted in an order being issued in the spring of 2016 requiring the senior citizen housing use to cease and the use of the building to be reverted to the authorized single unit dwelling. The order was complied with and the use as senior housing has since ceased.
Proposal Details. The applicant proposes a two-storey, ranch-style building for “Guardian Pharmacy” with an area for a retail pharmacy, and space for two doctors’ offices. The major aspects of the proposal are as follows: • The building is approximately 8,000 square feet over two storeys and has areas for a retail pharmacy and two doctors’ offices. • 31 surface parking spaces are proposed, as well as two Class A, and four Class B bicycle parking spaces. • No outdoor storage is proposed, and an area for refuse containers is to be screened. • A six-foot fence is proposed along the sides and rear area of the lot for screening from adjacent residential properties. • Two road access points are proposed (one entrance and one exit) along Beaver Bank Road. Enabling Policy and LUB Context The subject property is designated Urban Residential under the Sackville Municipal Planning Strategy. The property is zoned R-6 (Rural Residential) Zone under the Sackville Land Use By-Law (Map 2) which allows for single family dwellings, home day care, bed and breakfasts, pet care facilities within the home, and home businesses as well as agricultural, forestry, fishing, open space, and a variety of institutional uses. The Urban Residential designation (Policy UR-15) allows for consideration of medical clinics which are too extensive to be considered as a small business within a dwelling by development agreement. Policy UR- 18 allows for consideration of new local commercial uses by development agreement. Attachment B contains the relevant policy from the Dartmouth MPS along with a staff assessment as to how this proposal adheres to this policy.
Proposal Details. Start date: End date: Artist *Payment mu days followi payment date: fee is to be pa Virtual AiS/C Visits (3 sessions): AiS/C Visits are set at a flat fee of $200. This includes planning and three online activity sessions. If 'Virtual AiS/C Visits' is check-marked, enter $200 for the Total Artist FEE: Virtual AiS/C Residency (10 or more sessions): Enter number of virtual sessions including one paid planning session for each 10 activity sessions: Total Artist FEE @ $50/session: st be made within 10 business ng completion of residency. Total id by the Sponsor to the Artist.
Proposal Details. A: Outline Proposal Title Delivering improved community services Lead Local Authority Neath Port Talbot CBC Senior Responsible Officer Name Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Address Telephone Email Other organisations/partners involved in delivery ABMU Health Board City & County of Swansea Bridgend CBC Estimated total cost of proposal ICF Revenue £5,263k ICF Capital £2,526k The proposals in this application represent the first phase of a strategic transformation programme for community services. This comprehensive programme is supported by a 3 year business case to deliver the transformational change envisaged. Estimated Start and Finish date of proposal B: Description and Fit against Criteria Note: Please be as concise as possible, within a maximum of 150 words for each section below. The table in the guidance sets out the eligibility criteria against which proposals will be considered. NOTE WHERE YOUR PROPOSAL CONTAINS SEVERAL SCHEMES PLEASE USE THE SUMMARY TABLE ATTACHED AT ANNEX 1. The Western Bay proposal represents the first year of funding to support a 3 year Business Case for the Intermediate Tier. The primary objectives for this proposal are:
Proposal Details. The proposed discharging development agreement and new development agreement would apply to the existing apartment buildings at 50, 60 and 70 Xxxxxxxxx Court, as both buildings share the site’s access, parking and landscaped amenity areas. The existing agreement will continue to apply unchanged to two remaining commercial properties at Civic 000 xxx 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxx Road, which are held under different ownership. The existing residential site (two properties) at 50, 60 and 70 Xxxxxxxxx Court includes the following: • A total of 200 dwelling units in two buildings; • 267 surface parking spaces, including some visitor parking shared with buildings to the north at 82 and 92 Xxxxxxxxx Court; and • Outdoor amenity space of approximately 3,140 square metres (33,800 sq. ft.). The applicant proposes to enter into a development agreement to allow a seven-storey addition to the eastern end of the existing 4-storey apartment building at 00-00 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx (Attachment A). The major aspects of the proposal are as follows: • Approximately 75 additional dwelling units, of which 70% will be 2 bedrooms or more, which results in a total of 275 units combined in both buildings; • A minimum of 58 additional underground parking spaces and approximately 46 surface parking spaces to replace 78 existing surface spaces. Therefore, there will be a net gain of approximately 26 spaces or more, for a total of 293 spaces; • Exterior building materials to include masonry veneer at the parking podium level, non-combustible siding, architectural panels, vinyl windows and other glazing systems; • Existing outdoor amenity area to be maintained for tenant use in its present state or better; • Replacement of trees removed from the area of the addition with new trees; and • Indoor amenity space of 1,200 sq. ft. minimum. Case 21952: Development Agreement 60, 60 and 00 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Halifax Community Council Report - 3 - January 21, 2020 No exterior changes to the existing buildings are proposed, except at the east end of 60 Xxxxxxxxx Court to accommodate the addition. Renovations would be permitted in accordance with the zone standards for the R-4 (Multiple Dwelling) Zone of the Halifax Mainland Land Use By-law with the exception that the building addition be exempt from angle controls in the zone. Existing Development Agreement In December of 1992, the City of Halifax entered into a development agreement with Realco Management Limited for two commercial sites at 000 xxx 000 Xxxxxxx Xxxx ...
