Union Review Sample Clauses

Union Review. Union Representatives may examine a bargaining unit member's official personnel file, including the supervisor’s working file and the departmental personnel file, upon submission to the Employer of the bargaining unit member's written permission to do so. The Employer shall make available original or copies of the original records for examination by the Union Representative at the place where the records are kept.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (8)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Union Review. At the request of the Union, but not more frequently than once each four (4) years per classification, the Department of Administrative Services shall review up to five (5) designated classifications in the first year of the contract for duties, responsibilities, education and/or experience, certification and/or licensure and working condition factors. In the second year of the contract the Union may request up to four (4) reviews, and in the third year of the contract the Union may request up to three (3) reviews. Such review shall be combined with salary survey data to determine appropriate salary range assignment. Absent mutual agreement, said data shall not be used to reduce a classification pay range assignment. Such reviews shall be based upon a position description questionnaire survey of all incumbents in the classification, and shall be completed within one hundred eighty (180) days of the initial request. The timelines in classifications exceeding two hundred (200) incumbents will be mutually set. Each employee shall complete his/her own PDQ. Those employees who do not complete an individual PDQ shall be assigned to the appropriate classification and pay range based on the supervisor’s review. Employees on disability will be given the option to complete a PDQ, or have their supervisor complete a PDQ. Prior to the distribution of PDQs the Union and State shall conduct a joint training on how to complete PDQs. The content of the training shall be mutually agreed to by DAS and the Union. The scheduling and the training shall be mutually conducted by Agency personnel and the Union. The training shall be no more than two (2) hours. If an employee is found to have been improperly classified as determined from his/her PDQ, the employee shall be allocated to the appropriate classification in accordance with the finding of DAS. If the employee is performing duties of a lower classification, the employee shall be assigned into a lower classification and shall be placed in the step within the pay range that provides the employee with compensation that is equal to his/her current rate or that provides the least amount of increase, but no decrease in pay. Longevity supplements shall not decrease as a result of being placed in step X. If the employee’s base rate of pay exceeds the maximum rate of pay in the new pay range, the employee shall be placed in step X. If the employee is performing duties of a higher classification, the employee shall be placed in the...
Sample 1See All (4)
Union Review. The Employer shall not conduct surveys at the facility without providing the Union an opportunity to review and comment on the questions and related issues. The Union shall be provided an advance copy of any survey(s), prior to their distribution to bargaining unit employees, and shall have a period of five (5) days to review the survey prior to its distribution. Section 3.
Sample 1
Union Review. The Union shall be offered the opportunity to review and provide comments on the District's Five Year Plan prior to its consideration by the Board of Directors.
Sample 1
Union Review. Upon approval of the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Librarian reasonable paid time off work of up to one (1) day shall be granted to up to three (3) members of the Union in order to review the Employer’s documentation. Within thirty (30) days the Union shall advise the Employer if it is in agreement with the rating(s) established by the Employer.
Sample 1
Union Review. (1) Where it is alleged that a violation of the merit staffing Article has occurred, designated Local 12 stewards shall notify the appropriate Management representative that preliminary examination of the record is being requested. Such a request need not specify the name of the individual or individuals directly involved, but must specify the announcement number and the type of records being requested. The designated xxxxxxx, in the presence of an appropriate Management representative, shall be given access to the complete record of the particular action.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Union Review

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Exclusion Review Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be:

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Classification Review (a) An Employee who has reason to believe that they are improperly classified due to a substantial change in job duties, may apply to the Department Director, or designate, to have the Employee’s classification reviewed. The Director, or designate, will review the Employee’s application and advise the Employee of the Employer’s decision.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.