Preliminary Examination. 2.22.1 The Procuring entity will examine the tenders to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the tenders are generally in order.
Preliminary Examination. 24.1 The Purchaser will examine the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the bids are generally in order. 24.2 Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis. If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail, and the total price shall be corrected. If the Supplier does not accept the correction of the errors, its bid will be rejected, and its bid security may be forfeited. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the amount in words will prevail. 24.3 The Purchaser may waive any minor informality, nonconformity, or irregularity in a bid which does not constitute a material deviation, provided such waiver does not prejudice or affect the relative ranking of any Bidder. 24.4 Prior to the detailed evaluation, pursuant to ITB Clause 25 the Purchaser will determine the substantial responsiveness of each bid to the bidding documents. For purposes of these Clauses, a substantially responsive bid is one which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the bidding documents without material deviations. Deviations from, or objections or reservations to critical provisions, such as those concerning Bid Security (ITB Clause 15), Applicable Law (GCC Clause 30), and Taxes and Duties (GCC Clause 32), will be deemed to be a material deviation. The Purchaser’s determination of a bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. 24.5 If a bid is not substantially responsive, it will be rejected by the Purchaser and may not subsequently be made responsive by the Bidder by correction of the nonconformity.
Preliminary Examination. 19.1 Prior to the detailed evaluation, the Purchaser will determine the substantial responsiveness of each Bid to the Invitation to Bid (ITB). A substantially responsive Bid is one which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the ITB without material deviations.
Preliminary Examination. 19.1 The Purchaser will examine the Quotations to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the quotations are generally in order.
Preliminary Examination. 12.2.1 The Company will examine the Bids for any computational errors, for sureties furnished by Bidder, for authentication of documents submitted and completeness of the Bids.
Preliminary Examination. It is also true, for example, of supplementary and special proceedings such as rule 40—Commitment to Another District, Removal; rule 41—Search and Seizure; and rule 46—Release from Custody. Other of these rules, where applicable, also apply to proceedings before United States magistrates. See Rules of Procedure for the Trial of Minor Offenses Before United States Mag- istrates, rule 1—Scope: These rules govern the procedure and practice for the trial of minor offenses (including xxxxx offenses) before United States magistrates under Title 18, U.S.C. § 3401, and for appeals in such cases to judges of the district courts. To the extent that pretrial and trial procedure and practice are not specifically covered by these rules, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure apply as to minor offenses other than xxxxx offenses. All other pro- ceedings in criminal matters, other than xxxxx offenses, before United States magistrates are governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. State and local judicial officers are governed by these rules, but only when the rule specifically so provides. This is the case of rule 3—The Complaint; rule 4—Ar- rest Warrant or Summons Upon Complaint; and rule 5— Initial Appearance Before the Magistrate. These rules confer authority upon the ‘‘magistrate,’’ a term which is defined in new rule 54 as follows: ‘‘Magistrate’’ includes a United States magistrate as defined in 28 U.S.C. §§ 631–639, a judge of the United States, another judge or judicial officer specifically empowered by statute in force in any territory or pos- session, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the Dis- trict of Columbia, to perform a function to which a par- ticular rule relates, and a state or local judicial officer, authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3041 to perform the functions prescribed in rules 3, 4, and 5. Rule 41 provides that a search warrant may be issued by ‘‘a judge of a state court of record’’ and thus confers that authority upon appropriate state judicial officers. The scope of rules 1 and 54 is discussed in X. Xxxxxx, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal §§ 21, 871–874 (1969, Supp. 1971), and 8 and 8A X. Xxxxx, Federal Prac- xxxx chapters 1 and 54 (2d ed. Cipes 1970, Supp. 1971). NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES—1982 AMENDMENT The amendment corrects an erroneous cross ref- erence, from Rule 54(c) to Rule 54(a), and replaces the word ‘‘defined’’ with the more appropriate word ‘‘pro- vided.’’ NOTES OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES—1993 AMENDMENT Th...
Preliminary Examination. 27.1 The Procuring Agency shall examine the bids to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made (at the time of opening the financial proposal), whether required securities have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the bids are generally in order.
Preliminary Examination. 2.14.1 The Hospital will examine the tenders to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the tenders are generally in order.
Preliminary Examination. The Purchaser will examine the Proposals to determine whether they are complete, whether any computational errors have been made, whether the documents have been properly signed, and whether the Proposals are generally in order. Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis: If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price that is obtained by multiplying the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected. If the Offeror does not accept the correction of errors, its Proposal will be rejected. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures the amount in words will prevail. Prior to the detailed evaluation, the Purchaser will determine the substantial responsiveness of each Proposal to the Request for Proposals (RFP). For purposes of these Clauses, a substantially responsive Proposal is one which conforms to all the terms and conditions of the RFP without material deviations. The Purchaser's determination of a Proposal's responsiveness is based on the contents of the Proposal itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. A Proposal determined as not substantially responsive will be rejected by the Purchaser and may not subsequently be made responsive by the Offeror by correction of the non-conformity.
Preliminary Examination. (1) If the candidate does not meet the admission requirements set out in § 3 Sec. 1 through 4, he or she can be admitted only under exceptional circumstances. In this case, the candidate's level of knowledge must be determined in a preliminary examination that corresponds to the required final examination.
