Job Review Sample Clauses

Job Review. 16.01 The Board shall maintain a Job Placement Manual that shall contain the descriptions of all Job Families and Phases pursuant to the Collective Agreement. The Job Placement Manual shall be made available to Employees upon request. Job Review
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Job Review. Where an Employee applies for a full-time position at the University of Guelph (inclusive of jobs described in the Postings and Appointments Article 21) and does not get hired, the Employee may request a meeting with a member of the selection committee to receive feedback on their job application. The Parties understand and agree that this meeting is to be for pedagogical purposes only and does not include any right for the Employee to be accompanied by a Union Representative.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Job Review. If an employee or his/her supervisor believes that a unit job has substantially and materially changed, a proposal may be submitted to the Human Resources Officer. The Human Resources Officer shall review the position and issue his/her decision within 90 days of receipt of the proposal. If a change is approved by the Human Resources Officer it shall be forwarded to the President, Trustees and the Office of the Chancellor for their discretionary approvals. This shall be non- grievable.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Job Review. (a) The Employer agrees to review any existing job at the request of the Union when the Union feels that the job content has changed to the degree that an increase in salary is indicated. Individual members desiring a review of their own jobs must first submit a request to the President. If unable to achieve a satisfactory disposition at this level, they may after fifteen (15) days refer this matter to the Union for further action.
Sample 1
Job Review. The Company agrees to review existing jobs that are not classified and newly-created jobs, and to establish rates for same during the terms of this Agreement.
Sample 1
Job Review. Employees covered by this Agreement will be evaluated and informed as to their job performance by their supervisor and/or principal a minimum of once a year. The evaluation will be based upon their job description. If work performance is unsatisfactory, the employee will be informed and afforded an opportunity to improve. Three consecutive unsatisfactory performance evaluations of the employee, a minimum of 30 days apart, shall be sufficient for dismissal. Employees in disagreement with an evaluation by the supervisor or school principal may ask the Shop Xxxxxxx to schedule a meeting to review the evaluation with the Business Administrator, and after this meeting with the Superintendent.
Sample 1
Job Review. 15 Any employee who believes their job has changed significantly may request re-evaluation.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Job Review. ‌ Reclassification requests for a position may be submitted by the employee and the supervisor only after an employee has been in the position for one year and the job responsibilities have significantly changed. In the event that the supervisor does not support the reclassification request, the employee may appeal to the next-level supervisor. A rationale, i.e., a completed position questionnaire, shall accompany such request and be submitted to the Chief Human Resources Officer. Both the Office of Human Resources and the Staff Council shall approve any proposed change to the position questionnaire. Such request shall be submitted for any individual employee’s position and shall be processed according to the following schedule: March 1 File with Office of Human Resources 20 Business Days Later College Job Review Committee reviews and makes a recommendation with full reasons therefore. 15 Business Days Later If the employee is dissatisfied with the decision of the College Job Review Committee, the Union Job Review Committee may file an appeal on the employee’s behalf. 10 Business Days Later Job Appeal Committee reviews the documentation that was previously submitted to the College Job Review Committee and provides their decision to the College President.
Sample 1
Job Review. Employees who believe there has been a change in their duties performed may submit a written request for job review to their supervisor. The Employer shall review all such requests and shall respond to both the employee and the supervisor within twenty (20) working days.
Sample 1

Related to Job Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Salary Review All salaries below the maximum of a band shall be reviewed annually.

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.