Security Issues Sample Clauses

Security Issues. The Consultant shall comply with all policies of the Company, industry practice, and law and regulation to ensure that it affords security to information and assets of the Company and that the Consultant, or any persons with whom the Consultant works or with whom the Consultant deals, do not employ information of the Company in any manner contrary to law, good practice, good faith, confidentiality or fiduciary obligations.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Security Issues. 1. The security of the political leaders in Kinshasa shall be ensured as follows:
Security Issues. The Cooperator is encouraged to obtain the latest Department of State Travel Advisory Notices before traveling. These Notices are available to the general public and may be obtained directly from the State Department, or via Internet. Where security is a concern in a specific region, Cooperators may choose to notify the US Embassy of their presence when they have entered the country. This may be especially important for long-term posting. If security issues are affecting the Cooperator’s ability to meet time lines and/or to substantially accomplish the goals and objectives established under this Agreement, then the Cooperator must contact FAS immediately.
Security Issues. We make every effort to protect the integrity of your information. Any personal information you enter into online forms or surveys may be encrypted to ensure it remains private. We limit the right of access to your information to employees that need to use the information to respond to or process your request or transaction. We also take industry standard (IPSEC) measures to protect our sites from malicious intrusions or hacking.
Security Issues. The parties agree that they are responsible for disclosing to the mediator in advance of the first joint mediation session any concerns about safety or security. If there has been any physical aggression or threats of physical aggression, each party should disclose that information to the mediator prior to the first joint session in a telephone message or in writing, so that a decision can be made about the appropriateness of mediation and/or planning for the security of both parties during the sessions.
Security Issues. If a security breach occurs, unless our internal security is proved to have been breached, there will be a presumption that your security has been breached. If you request Services that allow for you to appoint an administrator(s) (collectively and individually, “Administrator”), that Administrator may have the ability to appoint additional Administrators and each Administrator will have the ability to determine which of your Authorized Users will have access to the Services, the type of access they will have (including access to information about your Accounts and the ability to initiate transactions therein), and the ability to add, delete, and modify Security Credentials. Your Administrators are solely responsible for determining, on your behalf, who should be trusted with your Security Credentials and for supervising their use thereof. You are responsible for all transactions initiated by your Authorized Users even though they engage in transactions that you have not authorized, regardless of the purpose and regardless of whether the Authorized User violates your rules. If an Authorized User loses or forgets their Security Credentials, they should contact your Administrator. If an Administrator loses or forgets their Security Credentials, they should contact us. You understand and agree that ANY ONE (1) AUTHORIZED USER may be able to initiate transactions (including transfers) from any of your Accounts using the Services, regardless of whether the Authorized User is authorized on those Accounts and regardless of whether any of those Accounts normally require two (2) or more signatures or has other restrictions.
Security Issues. ACP-EC partners agreed on the introduction of three security-related provisions into the Agreement. This includes a reference to cooperation in countering proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) (Article 11b). The provision calls for full compliance with and national implementation of existing international obligations, as an essential element of the Cotonou Agreement. The provision also contains: (1) a statement that additional financial and technical assistance will be granted for cooperation on non-proliferation of WMD and that this will not be funded from resources intended for ACP-EC development xxxxxx- ation; (2) a statement specifying that the timetable for such measures will be tailored to the specific circumstances in each country and (3) a provision whereby compliance with non-proliferation measures must be 10 | Partnership Agreement ACP-EC assessed in particular on the basis of reports produced by the relevant multilateral institutions. Partners also agreed to inclusion of a provision on the International Criminal Court and the Statute of Rome in the preamble as well as in the text of the Agreement (Article 11 §6). Furthermore, the revised Agreement includes a clause which confirms part- ners’ international cooperation in the fight against terrorism (Article 11a) and a provision relating to the prevention of mercenary activities (Article 11§3a). – Civil society and the participatory approach (2000) The general provisions aim to promote the involvement of civil society and economic and social players within the context of the partnership. They stress the need for information; support for capacity building; the principle of consultation of non-state players on reforms and economic, social and institutional policies to be supported by the Community; involvement of non-State actors in the implementation of programmes and projects; and the encouragement of networking and strengthening of links between ACP and EC actors. – 2005 Revision: deepening of participatory approaches The revision related to: • Non-state actors: insertion of provisions to facilitate non-state actor access to indicative programme resources, under a strategy to be approved by the Commission and the ACP State concerned. These actors can benefit directly from financing via grant contracts drawn up between the Commission and the body in question. This will apply provided that the types of non-state actors and the type of activities to be supported are identified in the co...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Security Issues. 33.1. The Company and all Employees will follow any approved system of entry to and exit from the facility. The system will include a method of personal identification for each Employee. The system may include computerised personnel access facilities activated by electronic or magnetic cards or by other means.
Security Issues. The widely accepted belief that relaxing foreign investment restrictions would result in an increased threat to national security is another significant obstacle to ownership reform.235 Recall that national security concerns stem primarily from the Defense Department’s (DoD) fear that allowing foreign ownership and control of U.S. air carriers would result in an inability to rely on U.S. carriers for airlift service during military emergencies under the CRAF program,236 and that “international political developments could create conflicts of interest that undermine an airline’s commitments to CRAF.”237 For example, foreign owners may receive requests or orders from their foreign government that contradict DoD orders. Proponents of deeper liberalization, however, have suggested several approaches for resolving this issue. First, they point out that, according to a study requested by the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Transportation Policy and conducted by the Institute for Defense Analyses, “[i]f strong risk-management safeguards were adopted, DoD could 234 See generally id. at 336 (discussing the need for greater information sharing with members of Congress). 235 See id. at 326 (discussing the derailment of XXX proposal to relax foreign ownership restrictions based on national security concerns). 236 Linzell, supra note 102, at 395. 237 Id. at 396 (quoting XXXXX XXXXXX ET AL., SUSTAINING THE CIVIL RESERVE AIR FLEET (CRAF) PROGRAM 41 (2003), available at xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ada43 1033&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf). effectively manage the CRAF program to meet national security requirements, even if the US government were to raise the current ceiling on foreign ownership and control.”238 Further, liberalization proponents underscore DoD’s current use of foreign flag air carriers for military transport, its explicit policy permitting reliance on such carriers, and extensive use of foreign-owned container lines for transport by sea, to undermine DoD’s position regarding foreign ownership and control of U.S. air carriers.239 They also observe that U.S. air carriers owned or controlled by foreign nationals could be required to remain or become U.S.-flagged, rendering them subject to all U.S. laws, including those statutes that penalize airlines for failure to fulfill their CRAF obligations.240 Penalties could be severe enough to require performance even in the face of contradictory requirements from a foreign government. And, ...
Security Issues. 1. Nothing in this Agreement shall exclude the right of the Government of the Host Country to take all relevant measures of protection in the interest of public safety or to prevent the implementation of the laws of the Host Country, which are necessary for the maintenance of public health and order.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.