Planning Process i. Give a brief history of the scoping process and all other public involvement, coordination, and previous planning efforts (corridor or subarea plans) relevant to the current project.
Planning Process. By November 30, the Trustees shall give notice of a Meeting of the Members in order to review the proposed budget and the use of the Funds Available for the next fiscal year. The notice of the meeting shall be given in the manner set out in Article 8.4. The Trustees shall make available for review at least thirty (30) days before the meeting:
Planning Process. Contractor shall ensure that the person-centered planning process is initiated and the service plan is developed within fifteen (15) days after Contractor is notified that the Enrollee is determined eligible for HCBS Waiver services. The planning process shall be led, when possible, by the Enrollee and include individuals chosen by the Enrollee. An Enrollee’s HCBS Provider(s), or those who have an interest in or are employed by the HCBS Provider(s), shall not participate in the planning process, unless the provision at 42 CFR 441.301(c)(1)(vi) is met. Contractor is responsible for procedures to assist Enrollees in the planning process, including how to resolve conflicts and disagreements that includes conflict-of- interest guidelines. The Enrollee’s Care Coordinator will assist the Enrollee in leading the HCBS Waiver person-centered service planning and will coordinate with the Interdisciplinary Care Team (ICT).
Planning Process. The Corridor Improvement Authority Act authorizes the Authority to develop long-range plans, designed to promote the economic growth of the development area, which is the intention of this Plan. Additionally, Oakland County has adopted certain performance standards, which determine whether the County participates in the TIF. One of the standards requires the City to adopt/amend the Community Master Plan to accurately incorporate the Corridor Improvement Authority Plan. Accordingly, a specific section focused on the Grand River Corridor is included in the City’s recently adopted Master Plan, which is presented in Appendix B. Building from the work that had already been completed, the process for this Plan began with an examination of the Master Plan. The City’s Master Plan planning process also served as the public engagement foundation for this effort, given the Master Plan process took place just prior to the development of this Plan. Finally, the goals for Grand River Corridor included in the Master Plan serve as this Plan’s foundation. This planning process also involved guidance, input, and approval from a Steering Committee consisting of representatives of various City departments, including administration, planning, assessing, geospatial applications, finance, and information technology. The consultant team worked with the Steering Committee to characterize the existing conditions of the corridor, develop design concepts for the gateways and streetscaping, establish a tax baseline, and prioritize projects for the next 20 years. During the planning process, members of the Steering Committee and consultant team also met with representatives from City Council, the Planning Commission, Oakland County Road Commission, and Oakland County to ensure coordination and support of this Plan. In addition, to solidify that the direction of this Plan is well supported, the Steering Committee and consultant team engaged business and property owner stakeholders along the corridor to gather input and test ideas. As part of this outreach, a business and property owner stakeholder meeting was held. The business and property owner stakeholder meeting occurred on September 12, 2017. During this meeting, the consultant team presented the preliminary direction of the Plan and solicited feedback. Participants in the meeting emphasized interest in safer and more convenient pedestrian crossings, public gathering spaces, and place making as it relates to elevating an identity w...
Planning Process. Unless specifically waived by the State Board, the Charter School shall comply with all requirements of state law for a goal setting and planning process, including, without limitation, the establishment of annual goals and objectives, the establishment of a Unified Improvement Plan (UIP), the creation and involvement of an accountability committee, and publication of an annual report to the public to be presented at a District School Board meeting. The Charter School’s accountability committee (“SAC”) shall report to the District’s Accountability Committee (“DAC”) to the same extent and in the same format as other District schools.
Planning Process. This section will describe the planning efforts involved in the preparation of the MHMP Update including: ▪ Narrative of and schedule for the planning process ▪ Activities of the MHMP Task Force ▪ Public outreach efforts ▪ Review and incorporation of existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information To achieve this URS will: ▪ Briefly describe the planning process for the 2008 MHMP ▪ Describe the review of the 2008 MHMP by URS and the Task Force and illustrate the conclusions ▪ Provide the MHMP Update planning process schedule ▪ List the MHMP Update Task Force team members ▪ Summarize the MHMP Update Task Force meetings, which will include: ⯈ Meeting #1: MHMP Update Kick-Off ⯈ Meeting #2: Hazard Profiles and Asset Inventory ⯈ Meeting #3: Vulnerability Analysis & Potential Mitigation Actions ⯈ Meeting #4: Draft Plan ▪ Describe public outreach efforts and stakeholder involvement to include: ⯈ Media releases/announcements ⯈ Placing relevant information about the MHMP Update, including the plan update process overview, DMA 2000 plan update requirements, hazard figures, and ultimately, and the Final Draft Plan on the Mendocino County website ⯈ Development of an MHMP web portal which features interactive GIS hazard maps. Features of the web portal will include, allowing users to locate a specific location (address or latitude/longitude coordinates) within the County then apply each hazard layer allowing the user to see the susceptibility to each hazard ⯈ A public workshop to inform and solicit input on the draft plan ▪ List the key state and local information sources reviewed and integrated into the MHMP Update and discuss how they were utilized during plan development
Planning Process. 4.1 The Parties will review, on a quarterly basis, Groundco’s Quarterly Forecast of Hub Operating Requirements and Airco’s capability for the next four quarters no later than 30 days prior to the start of each fiscal quarter. The Parties will conduct, in the third quarter of each year, a formal annual budget review with respect to the Services for the upcoming year. The initial Quarterly Forecast of Hub Operating Requirements is set forth in Schedule 8. During the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, the Parties will hold weekly meetings at the option of either Party.
Planning Process. Timeline for the City of River Falls, Town of Xxxxxxx Cooperative Plan & Agreement March 2020 2020 Task Name February March April May June July August September October November December Authorizing Resolutions • City • Town • Distribute Data and Inventory • Base Mapping • Data Gathering • Data Development Cooperative Plan • Mapping • Draft Element Plan Cooperative Agreement • Boundary Line • General Provisions Public Participation Activities • City/Town Meetings • Updates PC/UC/CC • Joint Meetings* • DOA Meetings * Joint Meeting: Every third Thursday of the month at 5:30
Planning Process. The Contractor shall ensure that the person-centered planning process is initiated and the service plan is developed within fifteen (15) days after the Contractor is notified that the Enrollee is determined eligible for HCBS Waiver services. The planning process shall be led, when possible, by the Enrollee and include individuals chosen by the Enrollee. An Enrollee’s HCBS Provider(s), or those who have an interest in or are employed by the HCBS Provider(s), shall not participate in the planning process, unless the provision at 42 C.F.R. § 441.301(c)(1)(vi) is met. The Contractor is responsible for procedures to assist Enrollees in the planning process, including how to resolve conflicts and disagreements that includes conflict-of-interest guidelines.The Enrollee’s Care Coordinator will assist the Enrollee in leading the HCBS Waiver person-centered service planning and will coordinate with the ICT.
Planning Process. In order for PG&E to include the effects of growth of the NCPA Parties’ Electric System loads in its planning studies, each NCPA Party shall provide PG&E with their respective electric load planning forecast by October 1 of each year. Each NCPA Party shall also provide PG&E with certain network modeling data as required pursuant to Applicable Requirements, including NERC Standards MOD-010 and MOD-12, as such may be revised from time to time. Such electric load planning forecast shall contain the best estimate of its gross Electric System load (actual MW and MWh as measured at the Point of Interconnection plus generation resources internal to the Electric System) and net Electric System load (actual MW and MWh as measured at the Point of Interconnection) for the next five-year period. The initial forecast shall be submitted to PG&E within 30 days of the Effective Date. Both PG&E and the applicable NCPA Party or Parties shall be responsible for participating in planning for the construction of any necessary System Reinforcements as provided in the PG&E TO Tariff Sections 8 through 10. If PG&E disagrees with the electric load planning forecast provided by a NCPA Party, PG&E shall coordinate with NCPA and the impacted NCPA Member Customer, and if necessary, either Party may request that an E&O Committee meeting be scheduled pursuant to Section 9.8.1 to review and discuss PG&E’s disagreement with the electric load planning forecast. Nothing in Section 8 prevents PG&E from using, relying on, or incorporating alternative forecasts in planning studies.
