(o). Reg. 522/17] The Trustee is hereby authorized and directed to make payment to the Vendor of the amount set out in and upon receipt of an original signed copy of RCCP Form 3 (being the then current form of such document so identified and posted on Xxxxxx’s website).
(o). Section IV(O) shall have the following added to the end of such Section: Physician agrees to comply and abide by all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and guidelines including all applicable Medicare laws, regulations, and CMS instructions, as well as all VIVA Health policies and procedures, including those set forth in the Provider Manual. Physician agrees to abide by all federal and state rules, regulations, and laws applicable to recipients of Medicare funds, including those designed to prevent or ameliorate fraud, waste and abuse and to protect and safeguard the confidentiality of health information, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Physician agrees to perform services consistent with and in compliance with VIVA Health's contractual obligations with CMS and hereby agrees to undertake any additional activities that may be required by CMS or may be necessary for VIVA Health to comply with the legal requirements of its contract with CMS.
(o). Dated: ------------- SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD PER G.C. SEC. 25103, RESO 79-1535 ATTEST: XXXXX XXXXXXX Clerti of the Board Orange County, California APPROVED AS TO FORM COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA By:�� � Dated: ///'20 WCB0318-Xx Xxxx 13 of 13 November 19, 2020
(o). 7.R.10 - Jurisdiction - Parties by agreement restricted jurisdiction to one out of Courts at two places - While considering application for return of plaint issue of jurisdiction cannot be left open by holding that issue of jurisdiction is a contentious one and that it required oral evidence when the same can be decided by examining the admitted document and there is no ambiguity that cause of action arose at two places and parties restricted cause of action at one place - Plaint returned to be presented in a court of competent jurisdiction. (M/x.Xxxxxx Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Xxxxxx Xxxxxx) 2016(2) Civil Court Cases 210 (P&H)
(o). 7.R.11 - Territorial jurisdiction - Loss of answer books - Suit for damages against University - Suit filed in a Court at place ’M’ where University is not having any office nor cause of action arising within limits of said Court - Held, return of plaint is proper. (Xxxxxx Xxxx Vs University of Kerala) 2012(2) Civil Court Cases 673 (Kerala) (DB)
(o). LCL"--'�f
(o). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, BUYER shall not be obligated to purchase the premises unless the SELLER shall have received a Certificate of Occupancy signed by the Inspectional Services Department of the City of Cambridge. BUYER shall be entitled to an inspection of the premises after BUYER receives notification that a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued and the Unit is in conformity with the plans and specifications attached to this Agreement. Buyer shall conduct an inspection of the Unit and should the BUYER find any defects, BUYER shall list such and immediately provide such list to SELLER, on the form attached hereto as Exhibit , whereupon BUYER and SELLER will agree on the value of the items to be completed on such list, and SELLER shall insofar as possible correct same prior to time of closing. In the event SELLER is unable to do so, and the value of such items on the date of closing is greater than $1,500.00, BUYER, at BUYER's option, may postpone the closing until SELLER has completed work on such list to the extent that the value of such list is reduced below $1,500.00. In the event BUYER wishes to close with the value of the list of items exceeding $1,500.00, or in the event the value of the list is less than $1,500.00 on the date of closing, the closing shall occur, and one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the amount it will cost SELLER to complete the work may be retained in escrow by the BUYER’s attorney until the work is done with release of the funds on an item-by-item basis as the work is completed. Notwithstanding the above or anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if there are requests by the BUYER subsequent to the execution hereof, identifying the Unit and agreed to in writing by the Parties, which adds and/or deletes any improvements, fixtures or appliances, or the like (the “Additional Unit Work”) and that Additional Unit Work has not been completed by the Closing Date and/or as a result of the Additional Unit Work other work has not been completed and/or building permit sign-offs cannot be obtained from the City of Cambridge, then the SELLER shall not be required to deliver building permit sign- offs or, if applicable, the Certificate of Occupancy on the Closing Date and the BUYER shall accept delivery of the Unit in such unfinished condition and pay the balance of the purchase price in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The delivery to the BUYER of a certification by the SELL...
(o) m.;.;.m;.;.o;..;d.;;.;it"-y-'C"'h.;.;.ar"'g"'e_,@"'-------------------.:...$1'-._61"-6--9-'0-per delivered Dekatherm DETERMINATION OF BILLING DEMAND
(o). In chapter 4 we introduce the possibility of a CPTV approach to leptoge- nesis which is considered in the work presented in [12]. In this approach we insert by hand the presence of the CPTV axial term into the Lagrangian Bµψ¯γµγ5ψ. Only a constant non-zero component of the background field is considered B0 = constant /= 0 while the spacial components are taken to be zero Bi = 0, i = 1, 2, 3. The effect of such a non zero background field B0 then appears in the dispersion relations of the particles, only up to linear order in the background is considered since it is assumed to be very small and so we set terms of order (B2) 0. This assumption will be shown to be consistent with the order of magnitude estimates of the background field from our first primitive studies of the leptogenesis effect induced by such a CPTV field to the more indepth analysis involving the Boltzmann equations. The lepton asymme- try produced by this model will be proportional to the quantity B0/mN (where mN is the mass of the heavy neutrino), analogous to the lepton asymmetry gen- erated in the CPV approach being proportional to the CPV factor εCP . In such a model we have shown that only one heavy right-handed neutrino is required in order to generate a lepton/anti-lepton asymmetry. Furthermore, the lepton asymmetry can be generated by tree-level decay processes, Channel I : N → lh+, (1.4) Channel II : N → ¯lh−, | | ' To start with we look at the review [12] of the simplifying approximation that the decaying heavy neutrino is approximately at rest ( p¯N 0). We consider the heavy neutrino to be decaying into SM leptons and anti-leptons, as well as the reverse processes occurring, it was found that for the decay of the heavy neutrinos in leptons (channel I (1.4))that only one helicity was allowed (λs=2 = '
(o). ~f'1 (name of Qualifying Facility) and Pacific Gas and Electric Company on behalf of the Seller. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on '2 - I '-I -/ I (date) at c.. h 0'" c.h; 116.
