Stakeholder Participation. Provide a very brief indication of the organizations collaboratively involved with the applicant in activities carried out through this proposal and explain their involvement.
Stakeholder Participation. The School has processes in place that ensure stakeholder input regarding the School’s effectiveness in such areas as student discipline, parent (guardian) involvement, community engagement, and motivation of students toward high academic achievement and good citizenship. The governing board communicates regularly with all stakeholders regarding student achievement and progress toward meeting the School’s goals. 1.6
Stakeholder Participation. Although extremely radical, might it be possible to open up the discourse at the national level and the European level, through court action? The Lisbon Treaty is not the end station, the continued evolution of the Union based on the rule of law, democracy, and protection of fundamental rights – at European and national level – will need to be further negotiated. Even the ECJ, as Xxxxxx notes,205 although it has repeatedly stated that European citizenship is destined to become the fundamental status of the Union’s individual members, “has steadfastly limited its jurisprudence to the realm of free movement and to an apolitical concept of citizens. There is much scope for a new essential jurisprudence in this area.” For citizens of EU Member States, periodic parliamentary elections and occasional referenda are unable to fill the lacunae adequately. Could not an opening up of the European constitutional order to litigation –in the same way as the Art. 267 TFEU reference procedure has achieved – at the national and supranational levels actually provoke the negotiation where EU citizens could exercise more control over or more participation in providing input into these negotiations? Xxxxxxxx has articulated the xxxxxx000 of migration of constitutional ideas and has argued that these migrations do not necessarily mean a one-way traffic from West to East. His reasoning is one with which the present author agrees and identifies the proposal set out below with Xxxxxxxx’x philosophy on championing migration from “East” to West. The proposal is admittedly radical and invests EU citizens, national constitutional courts and the ECJ with greater degrees of responsibility in the discourse on the continued evolution of the concept of sovereignty at both national and European levels. The jurisdiction of neither the FCC nor the CT includes the possibility of the actio popularis available before the HCC.207 Yet in all these states, the understanding of the “essential core of sovereignty” or “constitutional identity” – what Xxxxxxxx has referred to as the “conservatory elements of statehood”208 – has come from national constitutional court case decisions on the application of the rule of law, democracy, separation of powers or fundamental human rights to concrete cases (usually on reference from an ordinary court) or on the limitations to the transfer of the exercise of national powers to the EU in these areas. Could not the broadening of standing at the national level befor...
Stakeholder Participation. There will be two significant opportunities for stakeholder participation: • The workgroup will provide information to and solicit comment from the public regarding its periodic review of corridors and consequent recommendations, and also engage in consultation with other federal agencies, tribes, states, local governments, and other interested persons through an active exchange of information and opinion during review and before the workgroup makes a recommendation(s). Workgroup members will use this same process in their periodic review of BLM and FS IOPs and recommendations therefor. The MOU will outline appropriate means for conducting outreach, which may include listening sessions/information sharing, web postings/comments, or other appropriate means. • Any land use plan amendments that consider workgroup recommendations will require evaluation under NEPA in accordance with applicable law, regulations, and agency policy and guidance. The agencies agree to a robust public involvement process and will ensure that: o The NEPA process follows agency procedures, including all applicable opportunities for stakeholder, tribal, state, and local government participation; o All potentially interested parties are provided opportunities to participate in scoping and the environmental review process as required by agency procedures; o Opportunities for full involvement of minority populations, low- income communities, and tribes are promoted and provided by the agencies.
Stakeholder Participation. IBM has been working to develop a Stakeholder’s group to develop an FPA for the project to develop a site specific process exemption for the copper plating rinsewaters and evaluate IBM Burlington’s plan and progress in implementing the process changes to achieve the reduction of the global warming gas emissions. IBM has contacted four individuals to participate as direct participants. Each has indicated an interest in participating in the project, but no specific commitments have been made at this time: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx: Member of the Vermont Law School Staff and former Deputy Administrator of the USEPA. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx: Executive Director of the Vermont Natural Resources Council and former Chair of the Vermont Environmental Board. Xxx Xxxxxx: Chief Operator of the Essex Junction Wastewater Treatment Plant Xxxx Xxxxx: Director of the Technical Assistance Division of the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. Xx XxXxxxxx, a professor of Natural Resources at UVM, has tentatively agreed to participate as a commentor. All of these people were contacted twelve to eighteen months ago. Their interest will be reaffirmed once the Project XL is accepted. Efforts will also be taken to add additional members, either as direct participants or as Commentors. IBM is planning to contact additional potentially interested parties to complete the Stakeholders group. In addition, IBM will make public notice of the Project XL and Stakeholder’s Group in the local newspaper once the project is accepted by the USEPA for development of a Final Project Agreement (FPA). IBM envisions holding a minimum of three meetings with the Stakeholders. The first meeting will be an orientation session at which IBM will explain the various aspects of the project: an introduction to the Project XL process, an explanation of the semiconductor manufacturing process, the specific processes of interest to this XL project, and the regulatory issues that the project application is addressing. IBM also plans to have a draft FPA prepared to provide to the Stakeholder’s group to review for the next meeting. The second meeting would cover any orientation issues not addressed in the first meeting and begin a discussion of the FPA. It is expected that two to three meetings will be required to review and reach agreement on the FPA, though the dynamics of the stakeholders group may require more meetings. IBM will also work individually with the Stakeholders as appropriate to address and resolve ...
Stakeholder Participation. 1.5.9.1 The Regional Planning Process is open to any interested party.
Stakeholder Participation. Prior to or during preparation of any GSP, the Agency will encourage participation by stakeholders as appropriate, including, but not limited to state, federal and tribal governments, water and Groundwater management agencies and districts; land use entities such as counties and cities, non-governmental organizations representing water, Groundwater, environmental, environmental justice, and agriculture interests universities; and the public.
Stakeholder Participation. Throughout New Jersey’s participation in the NEPPS process, various mechanisms to inform the public and stakeholders of NJDEP’s pilot NEPPS efforts have been pursued. NJDEP management and staff have given numerous presentations on New Jersey’s NEPPS efforts to stakeholder groups such as: advisory committees to NJDEP (NJDEP’s Green & Gold Advisory Task Force, New Jersey Drinking Water Quality Institute, New Jersey Clean Air Council, etc.); state legislative committees; local and municipal officials (League of Municipalities Convention); county officials (New Jersey Association of Counties); national meetings/conferences (ECOS/EPA All-States Meeting, National Meeting of Environmental Management Practitioners, EPA Oversight Reform Workshop, etc.). Internal presentations have also been made to management and staff to keep them up-to-date and receive their input on New Jersey’s participation in NEPPS. Articles have appeared in various NJDEP publications (e.g., NJ Discharger, H2Observer), describing the different stages of participation (NEPPS in general, Self-Assessment development, Agreement development, etc.) as well as the next steps for New Jersey. Additionally, an initial press release was prepared (July 1995), announcing New Jersey’s intention to participate in NEPPS and a joint press event (between NJDEP and EPA Region 2), with subsequent press coverage, was held on March 29, 1996 to announce the signing of the pilot New Jersey FY96 PPA. Stakeholder input on the FY96 Self-Assessment and PPA documents, specifically, and New Jersey’s NEPPS participation in general was sought at a workshop held April 30, 1996. The workshop was entitled “Management for Environmental Results in New Jersey: Implementing the National Environmental Performance Partnership System (NEPPS)” and brought together a wide variety of environmental stakeholders to help guide the agencies’ fundamentally new direction of evaluating, environmental progress through the achievement of environmental outcomes. Close to 200 participants representing academia, environmental groups, business and industry, builders, other New Jersey state agencies (Governor’s Office, Departments of Health, Agriculture, and Transportation, Office of State Planning), federal agencies (USGS, EPA Headquarters, etc.), agricultural community, developers, religious groups, and other state’s environmental agencies (DE & NY), along with NJDEP and EPA Region 2 staff, came together to learn about NEPPS in general, and provide...
Stakeholder Participation. Provide a very brief indication of the organizations collaboratively involved with the applicant in activities carried out through this proposal and explain their involvement. FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2022 WORK PLAN
Stakeholder Participation. Out of all the questionnaires provided to the different Stakeholder groups, 273 completed question- naires were received as follows. Current patients: 65 (ESH) and 139 (WSH) Former patients: 13 Families/guardians: 14 State employees/community providers: 42
