Review scope and methodology Sample Clauses

Review scope and methodology. TDEC will designate a representative or representatives to participate in the review and report development. TDEC will provide OSMRE with the subject AML non-emergency construction project site population at the start of the review. TDEC will also notify OSMRE when any AML site construction starts during the review period and will provide the estimated construction completion timeframe. Project site files and respective grant files will be reviewed, TDEC personnel interviewed, and joint OSMRE/TDEC site visits scheduled and conducted for the sampled project sites. The goal of these measures is to evaluate TDEC’s performance in managing AML non-emergency construction and on-the-ground AML hazard abatement success. The results of each sampled project site visit will be documented in an OSMRE report. Sampled project file and respective grant file documents considered for review will include: • Correspondence generated during document development and interagency or intergovernmental consultation processes which may require specific permit conditions or mitigation measures for the construction project site. • Environmental documents developed for the project site (i.e. environmental assessments, categorical exclusions, and findings of no significant impact). • Engineered project site designs. • Project site construction contracts, technical specifications, and invoices. • Written procedures used by TDEC in AML construction management. • TDEC inspection reports. • Construction grant performance reports, and • Previous OSMRE site visit reports. The review will determine whether TDEC AML non-emergency contract monitoring and construction management effectively ensured: • Project construction was carried out or is being carried out in accordance with contract terms and technical specifications. • Compliance with any specific permit conditions or mitigation measures required pursuant to the interagency and intergovernmental NEPA consultation process, and • Construction achieved or is progressing toward achieving the project design goals to effectively reclaim the AML features involved. Beginning date: 10/01/2017 Completion date: 09/30/2018 Assistance requested from Appalachian Region None OSMRE FY 2018 OVERSIGHT WORK PLAN FOR TENNESSEE ENHANCEMENT AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW‌‌‌
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review scope and methodology. Review of Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) drawdowns and disbursements of OSMRE grant funding will be conducted to determine whether the drawdowns and disbursements of Federal funds are in conformity with the Grants Management Common Rule codified by the U.S. Department of the Interior at 43 CFR Part 12, Subpart C; the OSMRE Federal Assistance Manual Chapter 5-55; and the following criteria:  Drawdowns are limited to the minimum amount needed and timed to correspond with the actual, immediate cash requirements of TDEC in order to carry out the approved Tennessee abandoned mine land (AML) program and cooperative agreements.  Drawdown timing and amounts are as close as administratively feasible to actual disbursement by TDEC for direct program costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs.  Drawdowns are properly accounted for and in accordance with Federal grant and cooperative agreement funding requirements. Beginning Date: 10/01/2017 Completion Date: 09/30/2018‌ Assistance Requested from the Appalachian Regional (AR) Office: An AR Grants Specialist will conduct this review. OSMRE FY 2018 OVERSIGHT WORK PLAN FOR TENNESSEE ENHANCEMENT AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Sample 1
Review scope and methodology. TDEC will designate a representative to serve on the review team. Project file reviews will be conducted to determine if the State is timely and accurately verifying AVS ownership and control information for the contractors/subcontractors selected. OSMRE AVS System Advisory Memoranda will be referenced in conducting the AVS oversight review. Beginning Date: 10/01/2017 Completion Date: 09/30/2018‌ Assistance Requested from the Appalachian Regional (AR) Office: None OSMRE FY 2018 OVERSIGHT WORK PLAN FOR TENNESSEE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION‌‌ KFO and TDEC are committed to continuously interacting with citizen, environmental, and industry organizations. KFO maintains a mailing list of organizations and individuals who have previously participated in reviews of the AML Program. During the fiscal year, KFO requests input from these organizations and individuals to encourage them to provide suggestions for program reviews and improvements. Draft performance agreements and Annual Reports are posted on OSMRE’s website for public review. In addition, KFO staff is available to meet with individual citizens or organizations at any time during the fiscal year. TDEC routinely participates in these meetings. The KFO public review file will contain a record of any of these meetings. Each individual and organization will also receive a copy of the final report. KFO encourages citizen groups to request and schedule meetings related to specific issues. We will pursue other opportunities for public outreach throughout the fiscal year, as appropriate. PROCESSING OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969 TDEC and KFO agree to cooperatively and jointly develop an environmental document required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) for each AML project federally funded under all Tennessee Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Consolidated Grants. TDEC agrees to exercise due diligence in developing projects and will prepare an accurate description of planned construction activities and impacts to environmental features such as, but not limited to, streams, floodplains, wetlands, and threatened or endangered species and their habitat. TDEC will provide the description to applicable State and Federal jurisdictional or environmental agencies and request they provide NEPA consultation comments for use in the environmental document preparation. KFO, responsible for ensuring NEPA compliance, will, if requested by TDEC, assist in securing or resolv...
Sample 1

Related to Review scope and methodology

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Technical Standards Applicable to a Wind Generating Plant i. Low Voltage Ride-Through (LVRT) Capability A wind generating plant shall be able to remain online during voltage disturbances up to the time periods and associated voltage levels set forth in the standard below. The LVRT standard provides for a transition period standard and a post-transition period standard.

  • COVID-19 Protocols Contractor will abide by all applicable COVID-19 protocols set forth in the District’s Reopening and COVID-19 Mitigation Plan and the safety guidelines for COVID-19 prevention established by the California Department of Public Health and the Ventura County Department of Public Health.

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Specification and Service Levels The Specification sets out the Services that the Contractor has undertaken to provide. The Specification includes Service Levels setting out particular levels of service that the Contractor has undertaken to meet.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Service Level Standards In addition to all other requirements in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Best Claims Practices & Estimating Guidelines, Vendor shall use reasonable and good faith efforts to meet the Service Level Standards set forth below.

  • Drug Testing Procedures a. The testing procedures and safeguards provided in this policy shall be adhered to by any laboratory personnel administering departmental drug tests.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.