Planning Policy. KCC supports the longstanding ambition to regenerate the Romney Xxxxx area, in particular the town of New Romney which is identified in the Shepway District Council (SDC) Core Strategy Local Plan 2013 as the Primary Strategic Centre for Xxxxxx Xxxxx. The County Council recognises that if growth in New Romney is to be sustainable, the provision of business and services should be underpinned by an expanded residential base. KCC is fully supportive of proposal which will make a significant contribution to improving the competitiveness of New Romney Town. The introduction of new build residential dwellings will continue to boost the viability of the Town Centre. The application site is situated to the north/north west of New Romney Town Centre and in identified as a broad location for residential led development under Core Strategy Policy CSD8. Policy CSD8 sets out the policy framework for the development of the site which is to be preceded by the preparation of a masterplan demonstrating compliance with policy objectives and criteria. The County Council recognises the need for a masterplan to avoid piecemeal development which would undermine the policy objectives of the broad location and lead to the unsustainable provision of necessary infrastructure.
Planning Policy. 16.1 Canada and Manitoba will co-operate to provide the resources required to enable each of the five communities represented by the Committee to formulate a comprehensive Community Development Plan and to coordinate such Plan with government plans as provided for in Schedule "E" attached hereto and forming part of this Agreement.
Planning Policy. Table 4.2 – Planning Policy Ref. Description of Matter Applicant – Current Position SDC and NYCC – Current Position Position
Planning Policy. South Gloucestershire Council will: • Produce a “Local Plan” setting out the planning policies for the area. The Local Plan for South Gloucestershire will consist of the Core Strategy, the Policies, Sites & Places DPD and the Joint Waste Core Strategy with some supporting Supplementary Planning Documents on detailed matters. Planning Applications in South Gloucestershire are judged against policies in these documents as well as guidance in the National Planning Policy Framework and “other material considerations” where relevant. • Consult Town & Parish Councils when drawing up planning documents in line with national guidance and the Council’s Statement of Community Involvement. • Help Town and Parish Councils to understand Neighbourhood Planning processes through holding training events and a dedicated Neighbourhood Planning web page. • Within the resources available, endeavour to support any Town or Parish Councils who want to undertake Neighbourhood Planning with technical advice and advice on sources of information and support. Town & Parish Councils will: • Respond to consultations by the Council on statutory planning documents including a wider consultation with their communities where appropriate. • Review and consider the issues that affect their communities and set objectives which can be expressed as policies/actions for achieving identified outcomes through the planning system. • Recognise that Neighbourhood Planning will be led and managed by Parish & Town Councils. • At their own discretion, consider whether any of their aims, objectives and priorities could be furthered through the preparation of Parish or Community Led Plans, Village Design Statements or Neighbourhood Plans. (Under the Localism Act, parish & town councils now have the right to undertake Neighbourhood Planning by producing Neighbourhood Development Plans, Neighbourhood Development Orders and/or Community Right to Build Orders if they wish to. Where such documents are produced under the statutory process set out in the Localism Act and Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012, they will become part of the statutory Local Plan and any planning applications will be judged against the policies within them, alongside the other national and local planning policies. Parish or Community Led Plans and Village Design Statements would be non- statutory plans. Such plans produced by Parish or Town Councils can assist local communities in producing a common vision of how their co...
Planning Policy. Customer agrees to complete all online forms provided by Elite and to submit directly to Elite’s Operation Department no later than 14 days prior to their event.
Planning Policy. Corporate Planning Cycle The corporate planning cycle of Bloem water is based on a 5-year rolling plan that incorporates the Business Plan, Shareholders Compact, the Capital Infrastructure Investment Plan and the Budget. The Plan is reviewed on an annual basis. Approach to the planning of capital works Capital Projects CAPEX Policy In order to address the planning scenario for the immediate, short term and long term in line with population growth, water demand requirement, ageing infrastructure, resource planning to ensure sustainable provision of water services, Management develops a 5-year Infrastructure Programme and refers it to the Capital Projects & Fixed Assets Committee to consider and recommend to the Board for approval. The Capital Infrastructure Programme is revised on an annual basis to ensure alignment and prioritisation of the projects in terms of the resource availability and funding. The Capital Programme as complied takes the inputs of the Water Service Authorities, their Integrated Development Plans (IDPs), the Bulk Water Reconciliation Strategies and any related stakeholder’s inputs and considerations. Co‐ordination with Municipal WSDP’s (Water Service Development Plans) Service Level Agreements with various Municipalities have been finalised. The entity also assists Municipalities with training and technical support in areas of concern. Bloem Water also participates in the Provincial Committees to provide inputs on IDP’s (Integrated Development Plans) and WSDP’s.
Planning Policy. No objection, application is consistent with the Development Plan and emerging policies. Highway Authority: No objection, subject to planning conditions. Transport for London: No objection, initial concerns raised regarding servicing have been resolved. Roxborough Residents Association: Objects to some, but not all of the proposal. Notes that the site is adjacent to the old post office site (know as the ‘Dandara’ site), and considers that the two sites should be treated as a whole for the future of Harrow town centre. Objects to the use of the retail as a Tesco Express, given that there are already a number of Tesco stores within Harrow. Also objects to the proposed 24 hour gym, querying whether it is required in Harrow where there are already a number of gyms operating, and a new 24 hour gym has recently opened in North Harrow, commenting that it would sensible to monitor this one before giving permission to another gym. Finally, support the use of the building for educational purposes. Advertisement Major Development – Expired 07/03/2013 Notifications Sent: 7 Replies: 1 objection; 1 support Expiry: 27/02/2013 Summary of Responses • Support the reuse of the building, but overall objects, raising concerns over the proposed gym element, noting that there are three other gyms operating in central Harrow. Cites concerns with Tesco using the proposed ground floor retail, in the context of the other Tesco stores already in existence and refers to the Area Action Plan, which stresses the importance of retail diversity. Identifies that an independent butcher or delicatessen would be acceptable. • One letter of support has been received from Dandara Ltd, the owners of the adjacent former post office site. The support is based on the view that the proposed mix of uses would be beneficial to the town centre, which is an ideal location for them, and would bring vibrancy in an area of the town that has lacked investment.
Planning Policy. CBC’s vision for the site is established by reference to the current policy document framework for the site, namely: National Regional County Local
Planning Policy. The site is within the development boundary for Melrose and so the proposal must be assessed principally against policy PMD5. Within Development Boundaries development on non-allocated, infill or windfall sites will be approved if certain criteria are met. These criteria will be assessed within this report. One criterion is that the proposal should not conflict with the established land use of the area. The surrounding area is predominantly residential in character and so the proposal to build residential apartments on the site would be in keeping with this part of Melrose. The Planning Statement advises that the development would provide apartments for retired/older residents. The agent advises that people downsizing into a retirement flats frees up larger family houses, increasing the housing land supply and creating a chain of movements which ultimately means dwellings become available to a first time buyers, thereby slowing the rise of house prices. This site would be an ideal location for apartments of this nature, being close to the town centre, health centre and public transport. The proposal would increase the variety of accommodation types available in Melrose and provide accommodation for those of, or close to, retirement age not readily available at the moment. Layout and Design Policy PMD2 of the LDP requires all development to be of high quality in accordance with sustainability principles, designed to fit in with Borders townscapes and to integrate with its landscape surroundings. The policy contains a number of standards that would apply to all development. Policy PMD5 requires that the development respects the scale, form, design, materials and density of its surroundings; the individual and cumulative effects of the development should not lead to over- development or town cramming; the proposal should not detract from the character and amenity of the surrounding area. The proposal is to demolish the existing buildings on the site, which are out with the Conservation Area and are not listed, therefore consent is not required for their demolition. The photograph in the Design Statement shows a handsome church of historic merit but the church and manse have been significantly altered and extended over time, although elements of the historic fabric remain. They now have a low heritage value and so there are no objections to their demolition The proposal is to erect a replacement building accommodating 14 apartments, four on each floor and two ...
Planning Policy. 6.1 The adopted Development Plans that are of relevance to the 4 schemes include the following documents: • South Cambridgeshire Local Plan adopted 2018; • Cambridge City Council Local Plan adopted 2018; • Cambridgeshire Minerals and Waste Core Strategy (2011); • Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Minerals and Waste Site Specific Proposals Plan (2012); and • NW Cambridge Area Action Plan.
