Isabelle/UTP‌ Sample Clauses

Isabelle/UTP‌. Isabelle/UTP [38, 72, 36] is a mechanisation of the UTP semantic framework in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL [59]. It allows us to define UTP theories within the alphabetised relational calculus, whilst taking advantages of Isabelle’s type checker, and then mechan- ically prove associated theorems, such as algebraic laws. Such laws can then be applied to program verification tasks in Isabelle. ⇒ An alphabetised relation is essentially a set of possible observations that can be made of the model, such as the set of possible input and output mappings. Our model of alphabetised predicates, therefore, is α upred ¾ α bool, where α is a suitable type for modelling the alphabet, that corresponds to the state space. This means that we can easily implement the usual operators of boolean algebra and complete lattices by lifting the corresponding HOL notions on sets. Similarly, relational operators like composition P ; Q can also be obtained by lifting the corresponding HOL functions. ⇒ ≈ Variables in the state space α are modelled abstractly using lenses [31, 30], which are perhaps best known in the functional programming world. A lens V = S, for view type V and source type S, identifies V with a subregion of S. This is illustrated in Figure 4, where the hatched region denotes the portion of S that V corresponds to. Lenses can be used to abstract many types of data structure. For example, if S is a record type, then V might be a particular field, or if S is a function type, then V might be an element of the domain. A lens consists of two functions: get that extracts a view from a larger source, and put that puts back an updated view. Moreover the behaviour of lenses is constrained by a number of algebraic laws which are summarised in Figure 5. Since lenses are semantic rather than syntactic entities, we cannot compare them just using (in)equality, and thus we introduce further operators. Lens equivalence, X Y, states that lenses X and Y view precisely the same region of the source, though these views may have different types. Lens independence, X da Y, states that the two lens views are independent: manipulating the source type using X has no effect on the region identified by Y and vice-versa. Such operators can be used as the basis for comparison of variables. ⊕ We have mechanised a theory of lenses in Isabelle during this project, including an algebra that allows us to variously compose lenses in the style of separation algebra [12]. For example, the sum lens X...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Isabelle/UTP‌. ‌ In order to verify the correctness of UTP-based semantic models, we need mechanical support for formalising UTP theories, proving algebraic laws, composing them to produce denota- tional models, and providing provably corresponding semantic bases. In a theorem prover like Isabelle, we can go even further and construct proof tactics and procedures for proving prop- erties of theory objects (i.e. programs or models) in a particular semantic interface, such as a Hoare logic based program verifier. This then means that we have an unbroken chain from proof of program correctness to justification in terms of high-level properties in the underlying denotational semantic models and theories. We have therefore mechanised the UTP semantic framework in Isabelle/UTP [15, 17]. Is- abelle/UTP is a framework that allows the formation of theories, semi-automated proof of their properties, and theory combination to provide semantic models. It is a (relatively) deep se- mantic embedding of the UTP relational calculus into the HOL object logic. Unlike typical deep embeddings, it is also integrated with Isabelle’s type system and automated proof tactics. Thus it allows both precise reasoning about program semantics, and also facilitates program verification. Isabelle/UTP facilitates mechanised theory engineering, that is the creation and false € Q = ⊥D (8)‌ ⊥D; (P € Q) = ⊥D (9) (P1 € Q1) H (P2 € Q2) = (P1 ∧ P2 € Q1 ∨ Q2) (10) (p1 € Q1); (p2 € Q2) = (p1 ∧ (Q1 wp p2)) € (Q1; Q2) (11) Table 5: Algebraic laws of designs Figure 2: A UTP proof using the ISAR language exploration of the theories of programming with machine aided reasoning facilities. For exam- ple, all the laws shown in Tables 3 and 5 have been verified with respect to our model in this framework. We give a model to alphabetised predicates as a derived Isabelle type, and then define the standard constructs of predicates and relations as Isabelle functions. We also give a purely se- mantic model to expressions, variable renaming, and substitution. We then define proof tactics that allow us to automate proofs. The majority of these tactics work by soundly translating a UTP predicate into some kind of Isabelle/HOL construct, such as sets or binary relations, for which a large number of laws have already been proven. For example utp-pred-tac converts a UTP predicate into a HOL predicate, and this allow standard predicate reasoning to be applied. In contrast utp-rel-tac can be applied to relational conjecture, through ...
Isabelle/UTP‌. Isabelle/UTP is a theorem prover implemented within the Isabelle proof assistant and logic of HOL. It supports proof in the context of Hoare and He’s Unifying Theories of Programming (UTP) [20]. This is a general and unifying framework to define programming language semantics, and we have used it to encode Circus, amongst other languages. The UTP adopts a predicative approach that represents computational mod- els as relations over a theory-specific alphabet of variables. Those variables determine the observable quantities and can, for instance, include the state variables of a program, traces of a reactive process, or trajectories of a hybrid system. State spaces in Isabelle/UTP are modelled by record types (named tuples). In Isabelle/UTP, we use the command alphabet to construct such types. Below is an example that introduces three variables, x, y and z. The alphabet command is similar to Isabelle/HOL’s built-in record com- mand for introducing record types, but caters for some additional set-up in the context of UTP. We give a detailed technical explanation of it in [15]. To give an example of a predicate encoding, let us consider a model of the assignment z := x ∗ y . We encode it as follows in Isabelle/UTP. The above corresponds to the hand-written relational predicate x j = x ∧ yj = y ∧ z j = x ∗ y . Primed variables are used to refer to the values of variables after a computa- tion has finished, and plain (unprimed) variables refer to their values at the start of a computation. Whereas the third conjunct specifies the new value of z , we note that the first two conjuncts are necessary to ensure that x and y retain their values. The encoding illustrates a few salient points about Isabelle/UTP. First of all, variables have to be prefixed with either & or $, depending on whether they are used in the context of a plain predicate that does not allow primed variables, or in the context of a relational predicate that does so, like the one above. Secondly, operators (such as ‘=’ above) usually have to be subscripted to delineate them from HOL operators. There are a few exceptions to this; for instance, arithmetic operators can be written as in HOL. ∧ ⇒ ∧ Important to note is that the general view of the UTP modelling computa- tions as predicates facilitates a contractual view. For instance, more gener- ally, predicates of the form ok P ok j Q specify total-correctness pro- grams as familiar pre- and postcondition pairs (P, Q ). Here, ok and ok j are special...
Isabelle/UTP‌. ‌ Isabelle/UTP is a theorem prover implemented in the Isabelle proof assistant, on top of Higher-Order Logic (HOL). It supports proof in the context of Hoare and He’s Unifying Theories of Programming (UTP) [21]. This is a general and unifying framework to define programming language semantics. It adopts a predicative approach that represents computational models as relations over a theory-specific alphabet of variables. These determine the observable quantities and can, for instance, include the state variables of a program, traces of a reactive process, or trajectories of a hybrid system. To give an example, we consider the predicate

Related to Isabelle/UTP‌

  • Gouvernement des États-Unis Le logiciel et la documentation constituent des « Commercial Items » (éléments commerciaux), tel que ce terme est défini dans la clause 48 C.F.R. (Code of Federal Rules) §2.101, consistant en « Commercial Computer Software » (logiciel) et « Commercial Computer Software Documentation » (documentation), tels que ces termes sont utilisés dans les clauses 48 C.F.R. §12.212 ou 48 C.F.R. §227.7202. Conformément à la clause 48 C.F.R. §12.212 ou 48 C.F.R. §227.7202-1 à 227.7202-4, le « Commercial Computer Software » et le « Commercial Computer Software Documentation » sont fournis sous licence au gouvernement des États-Unis (a) uniquement comme « Commercial Items » et (b) uniquement accompagnés des droits octroyés à tous les autres utilisateurs conformément aux termes et conditions ci-inclus. Droits non publiés réservés en vertu de la législation des droits d’auteur en vigueur aux États-Unis.

  • Miami, FL; Orlando, FL; Ft Lauderdale, FL; Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC; Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC; Nashville, TN; and New Orleans, LA, and BellSouth has provided non-discriminatory cost based access to the Enhanced Extended Link (EEL) throughout Density Zone 1 as determined by NECA Tariff No. 4 as in effect on January 1, 1999.

  • OMB 2 CFR Part 200 Except for agreements that are straight hourly rate or fee for services contracts not built on a submitted Budget, all components of payment billed to COUNTY will be calculated in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2 CFR Part 200.

  • Xxxxx, Haldimand, Norfolk (a) An employee shall be granted five working days bereavement leave with pay upon the death of the employee’s spouse, child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, legal guardian, grandchild or step-grandchild.

  • Dienste Und Materialien Von Drittanbietern (a) Die Apple-Software gewährt möglicherweise Zugang zu(m) iTunes Store, App Store, Apple Books, Game Center, iCloud, Karten von Apple und zu anderen Diensten und Websites von Apple und Drittanbietern (gemeinsam und einzeln als „Dienste“ bezeichnet). Solche Dienste sind möglicherweise nicht in xxxxx Sprachen oder in xxxxx Ländern verfügbar. Die Nutzung dieser Dienste erfordert Internetzugriff und die Nutzung bestimmter Dienste erfordert möglicherweise eine Apple-ID, setzt möglicherweise dein Einverständnis mit zusätzlichen Servicebedingungen voraus und unterliegt unter Umständen zusätzlichen Gebühren. Indem du diese Software zusammen mit einer Apple-ID oder einem anderen Apple-Dienst verwendest, erklärst du dein Einverständnis mit den anwendbaren Servicebedingungen für diesen Dienst, z. B. den neuesten Apple Media Services-Bedingungen für das Land, in dem du auf diese Services zugreifst, die du über die Webseite xxxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/legal/ internet-services/itunes/ anzeigen und nachlesen kannst

  • Xxxxxx Xxx as Holder Xxxxxx Mae shall have the right to purchase and hold for its own account any Certificate issued pursuant to the terms of this Trust Agreement, notwithstanding the rights and duties conferred and imposed upon Xxxxxx Xxx by this Trust Agreement. In determining whether the Holders of the requisite amount of Certificates have given any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent or waiver hereunder, any Certificate held by Xxxxxx Mae in its corporate capacity shall be disregarded and deemed not to be outstanding.

  • Rozhodné právo This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced under the laws of Czech Republic. Courts of the Czech Republic will have jurisdiction over all disputes arising under this Agreement. Tato Smlouva bude vykládána a vymáhána v souladu s právním řádem České republiky. Veškeré spory vzešlé z této Smlouvy budou podléhat jurisdikci soudů České republiky.

  • Millwright Xxxxx be to assist and work under the direction and instructions I or A. He will work alone at times performing assignments in keeping with his training. During the course of his year, training must become proficient in good practices in the areas of fitting, aligning, lubricating and the operation of all shop tools and machines. In addition to the foregoing, he will be exposed to and the process of learning techniques required in trouble shooting key production machinery, pipe fitting, basic welding and machining but not be expected to display a high degree of proficiency in these areas at this point. Millwright Must be capable of performing the tasks of fittings, aligning, lubricating an able to operate all shop tools and machines. Must under direction become proficient in basic welding and pipe fitting as well as dismantling and reassembly of plant equipment. Under direction,will continueto develop skills in trouble shooting all plant equipment and improve his skills at machining part and be exposed to basic principles of hydraulics and pneumatic. He may work alone frequently, but occasionally will require direction and instructions form Millwright I or A. Millwright 11: be capable, without direction of fitting, aligning and lubrication and taking apart and reassembling plant equipment. In addition, is expected to be able to weld, operate shop tools and do pipe fitting as required. Must under direction, become proficient at effective methods of trouble shooting and repairing hydraulic, pneumatic and mechanical faults in plant machinery. I: Must be capable without direction of performing all practices under Xxxxxxxxxx Must under directionbecomeproficient at reading and understanding blueprints, all phases of installing new equipment, laying out hydraulic and mechanical drives and meet speed and power requirements correctly. Xxxxxxxxxx "A": Must he capable without direction, of performing all under Xxxxxxxxxx X, and Must take full responsibility for work done by himself or his assistant. Must he in possession of a Millwright Certificate or a Machinist Certificate or Welder Certificate. Millwrightspresently employed in this classification will not be required to have a Certificate.

  • HARGA RIZAB Hartanah tersebut akan dijual “Dalam Keadaan Xxxxx Xxx” xxx tertakluk kepada satu harga rizab sebanyak RM669,000.00 (RINGGIT MALAYSIA: ENAM RATUS XXX ENAM PULUH SEMBILAN RIBU SAHAJA) xxx Syarat-syarat Jualan xxx tertakluk kepada kebenaran yang diperolehi oleh Pembeli dari Pemaju/Pemilik Tanah xxx Pihak Berkuasa yang lain, jika ada. DEPOSIT:- Semua penawar yang ingin membuat tawaran dikehendaki mendepositkan kepada Pelelong, sebelum lelongan 10% daripada harga rizab secara BANK DERAF sahaja atas nama BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD xxx xxxx xxxx xxxxxx hendaklah dijelaskan dalam tempoh Sembilan Xxxxx (00) Hari. Bagi penawar atas talian sila rujuk Terma xxx Syarat serta cara pembayaran deposit di xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx KEBENARAN PINDAHMILIK: Harta tersebut akan tertakluk kepada kebenaran pindahmilik diperolehi oleh pembeli berjaya daripada Pemaju xxx/atau mana-mana pihak berkuasa lain (jika berkenaan). Nota: Butir-butir hartanah adalah berdasar Laporan Penilaian xxx perjanjian-perjanjian pembiayaan yang mana berdasarkan pengetahuan kami adalah benar. Walaubagaimanapun pembida hendaklah membuat xxxxxx xxxxx atas hakmilik induk di pejabat tanah xxx/atau pihak berkuasa berkenaan. Perjanjian ini tidak akan menjadi terbatal sekiranya terdapat perbezaan berkenaan butir-butir hartanah Untuk mendapatkan butir-butir selanjutnya, xxxx berhubung dengan Tetuan Suhaimi Yahya & Co Peguamcara bagi Pihak Pemegang Serahhak/Bank di Xx. 0-0, Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx 00, Wangsa Link, Xxxxxx Xxxx, 00000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx. (Ruj No. SY/BKRM(PJS)/LIT/010/2021/L) Tel No: 00-00000000, Fax No. 00-00000000, atau Pelelong yang tersebut di bawah ini:- TETUAN ESZAM AUCTIONEER SDN BHD (760902-H) MOHD NIZAM BIN XXXX XXXXXX (P.J.K) Suite B-15-03, Tingkat 15, Blok B, Megan Avenue 2, (Pelelong Berlesen) 00, Xxxxx Xxx Xxxx Xxxx, 50450 Kuala Lumpur TEL NO: 00-0000000, H/P NO: 000-0000000/000-0000000 FAX NO: 00-0000000 E-mail: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx Web site : xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Rujukan kami : EZ/LACA/BKRMB/212/2021/MNS/mas CONDITIONS OF SALE

  • MSEA SEIU shall have exclusive rights to payroll deduction of membership dues, service fees, and premiums for current MSEA-SEIU spon- sored insurance programs. Deductions for other programs may be mutually agreed to by the parties.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!