Table 6 definition
Table 6. Average Delivered Printing and Writing Paper Prices For Most Common Transactions: U.S. Dollars Per Short Ton: Uncoated Groundwood Papers" in the issue of the Paper Trader that reports prices effective on that Pricing Date.
Table 6. Present paradigm of màgnare “eat” in Italian, Verona dialect (Bondardo, 1972, p. 150) sg pl 1 ▇▇▇▇▇ magnémo 2 màgni magne 3 màgna màgna The Rumanian example shown in Table 3 is another example of a directional syncretism In this case, the first person singular form is dependent on the first person plural form, historically marked in the Romance languages (and, generally, in the Indo-European languages) by the bilabial nasal /m/. In addition to situations where syncretic forms constitute a coherent class of morphosyntactic properties (natural-class syncretism), and situations where pairs of syncretic forms exhibit a sort of directionality (directional syncretism), there are also instances of syncretism where the relation between pairs of syncretic forms may be seen as symmetrical, in that neither pair derives its exponence from the other pair. This type of syncretism has been called morphomic or symmetrical syncretism (▇▇▇▇▇, 2016, p. 179). The data on syncretism discussed above challenges the morpheme-based approach and provides further evidence for the paradigm-based approach presented in Section 2.0. In order to account for the ergative/dative syncretism in Yir-Yoront (Table 4) and the third person singular/plural syncretism in Italian (Verona dialect) (Table 6) paradigms are “irreducible” because they identify patterns in which two different paradigm cell license the same word forms. For the third person singular/plural syncretism in Italian, morpheme-based accounts would try to model the relationship between content and formal exponence in the following way (cf. [2a] in the Theoretical framework section):
Table 6. SUPPORT CLASSIFICATION BETWEEN MCC AND RSC The Table below describes, without limitation, the major functions of the MCC and the RSC. INSCOPE OWNER OUT OF SCOPE ------------------------------------- ------------ ------------- [**] [**] [**] [**] Escalation Management MCC Exchange administration MCC [**] [**] [**] [**] 2nd and 3rd Tier support MCC Crisis management MCC [**] [**] 3rd party contracts management MCC System management & maintenance o Install patches o Change parameter o File system modifications MCC o User setup [**] [**] [**] Remote traveling users MCC Hardware break/fix RSC Hardware replace RSC [**] [**] [**] PORTIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FROM THE SEC Statement of Work (SOW) In scope Owner Out of scope ----------------------------------------- --------------- ---------------- 1st Tier support RSC General Software support RSC All Customer purchased application on RSC make it work basis
Examples of Table 6 in a sentence
The adjusted model using the HIV-positive non-PI using cohort had the same covariate association except for age (Table 6).
Likewise, age, smoking status, cumulative pack-year exposure, alcohol use, marijuana use, kidney disease, and hepatitis C status were unequally distributed in the WIHS cohort (Table 6).
For example, items b, c and d may occur the next working day following completion of Milestone 6 (as stated in Part 1, Table 6) if the Customer provides approval to proceed.
The burner nozzle configuration and installation on the manifolds (or "rails") shall be consistent with Table 6.
BMI, and region of residence were statistically significant predictors of absolute difference in diary and Actigraph measures of light intensity physical activity (Table 6 and Figure 2).
More Definitions of Table 6
Table 6. Clustering performance (mean standard deviation) on the MirFlickr dataset. Per- formance metrics Accuracy and Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) are shown. Paired t-tests are performed and the symbol indicates that MMRSC is significant better than the corresponding algorithm at p value< 0.05. The best performance is indicated in bold. Dataset MirFlickr Method Accuracy (%) NMI (%) ConcatKmeans 28.5±3.2 † 31.4±3.7 † 35.7±2.5 † 33.4±2.5 † 31.5±2.0 † 24.0±0.9 † 21.0±1.3 † 36.6±3.6 37.9±1.9 13.3±4.8† 16.4±4.5† 22.2±3.3† 18.7±2.5 † 17.1±2.1 † 12.0±2.3 † 6.6±0.6 † 21.5±3.1 † 23.2±1.3 ConcatNMF ConcatSC ConcatGraphSC CollNMF MultiNMF CONMF-W CONMF-B MMRSC accuracy of 0.21. As we mentioned before, the drawback of CoNMF is that it is impractical to select the best performing coefficient matrix, thus limits its application. MMRSC signifi- cantly outperforms CoNMF-B for the NMI metric, and also has a better performance than CoNMF-B for the Accuracy metric. It shows that on the heterogeneous dataset Mirflickr, MMRSC can achieve a better performance.
Table 6. Cutthroat/rainbow trout redds observed in three Lake Chelan tributaries, 2011. Survey Dates Tributary 4/20/11 5/04/11 5/17/11 Total Redds Fish Creek 0 0 0 0 Bear Creek 0 0 0 0 Safety Harbor Creek 0 NSa 0 0 Lake Chelan Level (ft.msl) 1084.1 1083.1 1084.8 aNS=No survey Table 7: Snorkel survey results for three Lake Chelan tributaries, 2011. Tributary Survey Dates Lake Chelan level (ft. msl) Survey Reach Length (m) Fish a Species Length of Fish (cm) <3 3-10 10-20 >20 Fish Creek 9/15/2010 1,098 100 ▇▇▇ 0 18 29 11 WCT 0 1 1 0 UNK 3 0 0 0 Bear Creekb 9/15/2010 1,098 100 ▇▇▇ 0 2 1 0 WCT 0 0 0 0 UNK 0 0 0 0 Safety Harbor Creek 09/29/2010 1,097 150 ▇▇▇ 0 7 8 9 WCT 0 4 4 7 UNK 7 0 0 0 aRBT=rainbow trout; WCT=westslope cutthroat trout; UNK=either ▇▇▇ or WCT (too small to determine); KOK=kokanee bThe water level was too high to effectively conduct a snorkel survey for Bear Creek. The USFS decided to not survey Lake Chelan tributary spawning grounds in 2012 due to the challenges of logistics, timing, and efficiency. Due to the occurrence of several fires that started in September, the USFS was only able to conduct one snorkel survey in 2012. The survey was conducted on September 12th on Fish Creek; 100 meters were snorkeled and zero fish were observed. In 2013 the USFS was unable to complete the work proposed in the 2013 work plan due to a change in district staffing. The USFS District Ranger has requested that the work planned for 2013 be rolled over to 2014.
Table 6. Additional provisions for class E passing beam Part B (bending modes): Table 1 Part A applies, however with the lines No.1, 2, 7, 13 and 18 being replaced by those listed hereunder
Table 6. 2: Monthly ▇▇▇▇ Oil data for country Z
Table 6. Public Health Microbiology Laboratory, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Dublin Grade/Title (Please List) Staff Engaged in any Food Safety/Control Activities Management (Scientific) Scientific/Technical Administration Ancillary
Table 6. Supplier's cost saving under an SLA using a dynamic policy with linear incentives – comparison of the incentive ratio, holding cost, and PRP Performance review period (T ) Ratio h 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0.50 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 1.2 1.00 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.34 1.50 0.20 0.26 0.34 0.40 0.45 0.48 0.51 0.53 0.52 2.00 0.29 0.42 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 1.3 1.00 0.21 0.18 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.31 0.33 0.34 1.50 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.41 0.46 0.49 0.52 0.53 0.52 2.00 0.31 0.42 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 1.4 1.00 0.21 0.18 0.20 0.24 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.33 0.35 1.50 0.21 0.29 0.37 0.42 0.47 0.50 0.52 0.53 0.52 2.00 0.33 0.42 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.37 0.37 0.37 (a) h = 0.5 (b) h = 1 (c) h = 1.5 (d) h = 2 Figure 11: Linear incentives SLA: Supplier's cost saving under an SLA using a dynamic policy with linear incentives – comparison of the incentive ratio, holding cost, and PRP
Table 6. SLA requirement for interfaces of City Fame components