Programming Language Sample Clauses

Programming Language. Java We use the Java programming language as it is currently one of the most widely supported languages, while still providing the scalability and security required for modern business applications. Java also has one of the largest selection of libraries which means there are tools available to do many of the tasks that are not available in other languages.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Programming Language. For efficiency of description, we describe our static CCC on the following minimal programming language. Note that our static CCC supports Java programs, and we later describe Java-specific issues. z e Z x e Variable E e Expression Stmt e Statement p e Procedure-Name E ::= z | x | Eb Eb ::= true | false | E==E | E > E | !Eb | Eb && Eb | Eb || Eb | call p(E) Stmt ::= x=E | return x | Stmt; Stmt | if Eb then Stmt else Stmt | while Eb do Stmt Our minimal language is a typical imperative procedural language that can manipu- late integers and booleans. Pointers are not part of our minimal language. However, our language supports a procedure call with a call expression, call p(E). Expression call p(E) invokes procedure p with call-by-value semantics, and returns a value of the ending return statement of p. To further simplify discourse, we assume that (1) a procedure takes only one argu- ment, (2) a procedure always returns a return value, (3) there are no global variables, and (4) a procedure call is deterministic and side-effect-free. These artificial assump- tions are only for simplicity, and they are unnecessary for supporting static CCC. In Section 7.7, we describe how we handle the extended features of the Java programming language such as throwing exceptions and modifying fields.
View Source
Programming Language. Open source web application framework.
View Source
Programming Language. For efficiency of description, we describe our static CCC on the following minimal programming language. Note that our static CCC supports Java programs, and we later describe Java-specific issues. z ∈ Z x ∈ Variable E ∈ Expression Stmt ∈ Statement p ∈ Procedure-Name E ::= z | x | Eb Eb ::= true | false | E==E | E > E | !Eb | Eb && Eb | Eb || Eb | call p(E) Stmt ::= x=E | return x | Stmt; Stmt | if Eb then Stmt else Stmt | while Eb do Stmt Our minimal language is a typical imperative procedural language that can manipu- late integers and booleans. Pointers are not part of our minimal language. However, our language supports a procedure call with a call expression, call p(E). Expression call p(E) ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Vol. 24, No. 3, Article 18, Pub. date: May 2015.
View Source
Programming Language. There is a wide variety of programming language available today. Older and more robust ones like C / C++ and newer ones like C#, NodeJS, Go which provides better solutions for today’s coding problems (async, multi-threading, heavy network communications). There is no good or bad programming language, but some are better than others when facing specific challenges. With a monolithic approach, the developer chooses only one programming language which is used exclusively in the whole software package. Another hallmark of monolithic approaches is that all is contained in one software package. In polyglot programming the developer has the freedom to write different parts of the software in different languages. This way the developer can leverage most of the benefits of each language. A danger of polyglot approaches is that the codebase becomes fragmented in many different languages and requires a variety of skillsets to maintain. In the Prime-VR2 project we choose polyglot approach but limit the number of languages to a small set: C#, NodeJS. For certain heavy data and network traffic handling, using the language Go language is proposed. C# is developed and maintained by Microsoft. Because it’s wide adoption in education it’s easy to find a C# developer in any seniority level. Also the chosen game engine, Unity3D using C# as its main programming language. NodeJS is a free, open-source language built on top of Javascript. One of the ideas behind the language is to reuse the front-end web knowledge when developing the backend. Most of the web programmers know how to code in Javascript. This makes it easier to find developers and maintain the code base. Javascript also has a huge online community, which makes finding answers and solutions easy. Go is an open source, compiled and statically typed programming language developed and maintained by Google. The main goal is to reach the C++ performance but without the difficulties what C++ could mean. Go is only a few years old language but it is gaining popularity. It is offering a simple syntax, a fast compiler and supports concurrent programming from the very beginning.
View Source

Related to Programming Language

  • Sample Language The following provides a sample contract clause: Compliance with the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ “Anti-Kickback” Act.

  • Contract Language The following language shall be included in contracts for City projects between the Consultant and any Subcontractors, vendors, and suppliers: Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, gender, gender expression, gender identity, religion, national origin, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, or disability in the solicitation, selection, hiring, or treatment of subcontractors, vendors, or suppliers. Consultant shall provide equal opportunity for Subcontractors to participate in opportunities. Consultant understands and agrees that violation of this clause shall be considered a material breach of the contract and may result in contract termination, debarment, or other sanctions.

  • Warning Language (a) Where required to meet the criteria set forth in Section 2.2, Empire shall display one of the following warning statements on the packaging label of the Products that do not meet the warning exemption standard set forth in Section 2.1 above: (1) WARNING: Consuming this product can expose you to chemicals including Lead, which [is] are known to the State of California to cause [cancer and] birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information go to "▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇ (2) WARNING: [Cancer and] Reproductive Harm- ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇ Empire may use “cancer and” in the warning at its option. Empire may include the names of additional chemicals in the warning if they are present in the Products at a level that Empire reasonably believes would require a Proposition 65 warning. (b) The requirements for warnings, set forth in subsection (a) above, are imposed pursuant to the terms of this Settlement Agreement. The Parties recognize that these are not the exclusive methods of providing a warning under Proposition 65 and its implementing regulations. Empire shall be deemed to be in compliance with the warning requirements of this Settlement Agreement by either adhering to this Section 2.3 or by complying with the Proposition 65 warning requirements adopted by the State of California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) as of or after the Effective Date. (c) If Proposition 65 warnings for Lead should no longer be required, Empire shall have no further obligations pursuant to this Settlement Agreement.

  • Controlling Language This Agreement is in English only, which language shall be controlling in all respects. All documents exchanged under this Agreement shall be in English.

  • Suggested Language The following provides a debarment and suspension clause. It incorporates an optional method of verifying that contractors are not excluded or disqualified. (1) This contract is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R. pt. 180 and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000. As such, the contractor is required to verify that none of the contractor’s principals (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.995) or its affiliates (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.935). (2) The contractor must comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C, and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into. (3) This certification is a material representation of fact relied upon by the Participating Public Agency. If it is later determined that the contractor did not comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to the Participating Public Agency, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment. (4) The bidder or proposer agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C while this offer is valid and throughout the period of any contract that may arise from this offer. The bidder or proposer further agrees to include a provision requiring such compliance in its lower tier covered transactions.