Product Review Sample Clauses

Product Review. 4.15.1. Products shall be reviewed periodically to ensure a consistent, quality product is produced.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Product Review. Seller shall inform Buyer by October 1 of each year (commencing with October 1 of the second calendar year preceding the estimated commencement of the first Contract Year) of the expected approximate analysis of copper (which expected approximate analysis of copper shall constitute the Annual Budgeted Copper Grade), gold, silver, alumina (Al x 1.8889), iron, sulphur, arsenic, bismuth, antimony, chlorine, lead, zinc, nickel plus cobalt, fluorine and mercury for the Concentrates to be delivered in the first succeeding Contract Year, plus a preliminary estimated analysis of such elements or compounds for the succeeding four (4) Contract Years (the "Preliminary Estimated Analysis"). Seller shall also inform Buyer at least 30 days prior to the date of the meeting which is held every five (5) years in accordance with the provisions of Article 10 to review certain commercial terms, of the chemical analysis of the Concentrates (including all of the same elements listed in the analysis recited in Section 2.1) which Seller expects the Concentrates will assay on a dry basis for the ensuing five (5) Contract Years of the term of this Agreement (each such analysis, as well as the analysis for the first five (5) Contract Years set forth in Section 2.01, is hereinafter referred to as a "Five-Year Expected Analysis"). Such estimates shall be based on the geological and engineering information and data available to Seller at the time of the production of such estimates, and shall be as accurate as is reasonably practicable.
Sample 1Sample 2
Product Review. Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall respond promptly to Parent’s reasonable requests for information concerning the Company’s use of Open Execution Copy Source Software (including providing descriptions of whether and how the Open Source Software is or was used, modified and/or distributed) and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to take such actions as reasonably requested by Parent to address issues identified by Parent arising from the results of the scan of the currently-supported release(s) of the Company’s Software at the request of Parent; provided that, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no failure to have completed the actions requested by Parent pursuant to this Section 5.16 prior to the Effective Time shall be deemed to constitute a failure of the condition to the Merger set forth in Section 6.2(b).
Sample 1
Product Review. ODC shall furnish to Supplier, prior to publication or other dissemination, a copy of each version of the ODC MFF Product to be distributed by ODC and representative copies of all other material and publications that use or display the trade name, logos, trademarks or servicemarks of Supplier. Supplier shall, after its review, return to ODC such ODC MFF Products and other material and publications. ODC shall make such changes as Supplier may reasonably require to ensure proper use of its intellectual property and to avoid any statement that is, in Supplier's business judgment, inaccurate, objectionable, or misleading. Neither party shall have the right to use the other's intellectual property except in connection with the ODC MFF Products and the promotion and publication thereof.
Sample 1
Product Review. At Inspire’s request, (i) Novasep promptly shall meet with Inspire for the purpose of review of such matters related to manufacturing of the API as may be specified by Inspire, including discussing strategies for improving the product manufacturing processes, and (ii) Novasep shall prepare and provide to Inspire written product reviews documenting such matters at least annually.
Sample 1
Product Review. Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with Parent and its Representatives with respect to their review of the Company Software Products and to take actions consistent with those described on Schedule 6.09 hereto; provided that, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no failure to have satisfied this Section 6.09 prior to the Effective Time shall be deemed to constitute a failure of the condition to the Merger set forth in Section 9.02(b) to be satisfied; provided further that, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no information arising out of or relating to the matters set forth in this Section 6.09 shall be deemed to constitute a failure of the condition to the Merger set forth in Section 9.02(a) to be satisfied.
Sample 1
Product Review. Actual service data will be closely monitored and at the end of the first six months of service, for each product an evaluation will be made to determine how closely the products have tracked to the number of repair actions and duration of service calls based on the technical data provided to IBM by QMS. QMS will also evaluate the cost of Warranty based on the number of service calls, travel expense and parts usage as provided by IBM. QMS and IBM will review call center activity to determine if the expected volumes are being realized. If it is determined by either party that a price increase or decrease is deemed necessary this will be negotiated at that time. After the initial review, IBM and QMS will review performance and pricing on an annual basis to determine whether pricing actions are required.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Product Review. LACEY shall provide DSCO with documentation of review and approval of each production lot of finished products prior to their release in the form of a Certificate of Conformity (CoC), in such form as shall be acceptable to both Parties. Each CoC must be signed and dated by a LACEY Representative and thereafter countersigned and dated by a DSCO Representative within 5 Days of receipt.
Sample 1
Product Review 
Sample 1

Related to Product Review

  • Product Recall (a) If a recall is required by applicable Law, or if Buyer or Supplier reasonably determines that a recall is advisable because the goods may create a potential safety hazard, are not in compliance with any applicable code, standard or legal requirement, or contain a defect or non-conformance with the requirements of this Order occurring or likely to occur in multiple goods, which such defects or non-conformances are substantially similar or have substantially similar causes or effects (collectively a “Serial Defect”), the parties shall promptly communicate such facts to each other. At Buyer’s request, Supplier shall promptly develop a corrective action plan satisfactory to Buyer, which shall include all actions required to recall and/or repair the goods and any actions required by applicable Law (“Corrective Action Plan”) for Buyer’s review and approval. At Buyer’s election, Xxxxx may develop the Corrective Action Plan. In no event shall Buyer and Supplier’s failure to agree on the Corrective Action Plan delay the timely notification of a potential safety hazard, non-compliance or Serial Defect to users of the goods, cause either party to be non-compliant with applicable Law or prevent Buyer from taking reasonable actions to prevent injury or damage to persons, equipment or other property. Supplier and Buyer shall cooperate with and assist each other in any corrective actions and/or filings, if applicable.

  • Product Recalls The Company is not aware of any pattern or series of claims against the Company or any of its subsidiaries which reasonably could be expected to result in a generalized product recall relating to products sold by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, regardless of whether such product recall is formal, informal, voluntary or involuntary.

  • Product Testing Upon request, Customer shall provide Operator a laboratory report for each Product delivery by Customer or Customer’s supplier. Operator will not be obligated to receive Contaminated Product for throughput across the Berths, nor will Operator be obligated to accept Product that fails to meet the quality specifications set forth in the arrival notice.

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Product Quality 4.1 The following provisions shall apply to Product after Production:

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

  • Product ACCEPTANCE Unless otherwise provided by mutual agreement of the Authorized User and the Contractor, Authorized User(s) shall have thirty (30) days from the date of delivery to accept hardware products and sixty (60) days from the date of delivery to accept all other Product. Where the Contractor is responsible for installation, acceptance shall be from completion of installation. Failure to provide notice of acceptance or rejection or a deficiency statement to the Contractor by the end of the period provided for under this clause constitutes acceptance by the Authorized User(s) as of the expiration of that period. The License Term shall be extended by the time periods allowed for trial use, testing and acceptance unless the Commissioner or Authorized User agrees to accept the Product at completion of trial use. Unless otherwise provided by mutual agreement of the Authorized User and the Contractor, Authorized User shall have the option to run testing on the Product prior to acceptance, such tests and data sets to be specified by User. Where using its own data or tests, Authorized User must have the tests or representative set of data available upon delivery. This demonstration will take the form of a documented installation test, capable of observation by the Authorized User, and shall be made part of the Contractor’s standard documentation. The test data shall remain accessible to the Authorized User after completion of the test. In the event that the documented installation test cannot be completed successfully within the specified acceptance period, and the Contractor or Product is responsible for the delay, Authorized User shall have the option to cancel the order in whole or in part, or to extend the testing period for an additional thirty (30) day increment. Authorized User shall notify Contractor of acceptance upon successful completion of the documented installation test. Such cancellation shall not give rise to any cause of action against the Authorized User for damages, loss of profits, expenses, or other remuneration of any kind. If the Authorized User elects to provide a deficiency statement specifying how the Product fails to meet the specifications within the testing period, Contractor shall have thirty (30) days to correct the deficiency, and the Authorized User shall have an additional sixty (60) days to evaluate the Product as provided herein. If the Product does not meet the specifications at the end of the extended testing period, Authorized User, upon prior written notice to Contractor, may then reject the Product and return all defective Product to Contractor, and Contractor shall refund any monies paid by the Authorized User to Contractor therefor. Costs and liabilities associated with a failure of the Product to perform in accordance with the functionality tests or product specifications during the acceptance period shall be borne fully by Contractor to the extent that said costs or liabilities shall not have been caused by negligent or willful acts or omissions of the Authorized User’s agents or employees. Said costs shall be limited to the amounts set forth in the Limitation of Liability Clause for any liability for costs incurred at the direction or recommendation of Contractor.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Product Changes Vocera shall have the right, in its absolute discretion, without liability to End User, to update to provide new functionality or otherwise change the design of any Product or to discontinue the manufacture or sale of any Product. Vocera shall notify End User at least 90 days prior to the delivery of any Product which incorporates a change that adversely affects form, fit or function (“Material Change”). Vocera shall also notify End User at least 90 days prior to the discontinuance of manufacture of any Product. Notification will be made as soon as reasonably practical for changes associated with regulatory or health and safety issues.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.