Comparison of Tenders. 34.1 The Procuring Entity shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 33.2 to determine the Tender that has the lowest evaluated cost. The comparison shall be on the basis of total cost (place of final destination) prices for all goods and all prices, plus cost of inland transportation and insurance to place of destination, for goods manufactured within the Kenya, together with prices for any required installation, training, commissioning and other services.
Comparison of Tenders. 36.1 The Procuring Entity shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 35.2 to determine the Tender that has the lowest evaluated cost.
Comparison of Tenders. 35.1 KPLC shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 29 to determine the ranking of the Tenders based on the lowest evaluated cost. The comparison shall be on the basis of DDP (place of final destination) prices for imported Goods and EXW prices, custom duties plus cost of inland transportation and insurance to place of destination, for Goods manufactured within Kenya, together with prices for any required installation, training, commissioning and other Related Services.
Comparison of Tenders. 36.1 KPLC shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 35.2 to determine the Tender that has the lowest evaluated cost.
Comparison of Tenders. The Procuring Entity shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 33.2 to determine the Tender that has the lowest evaluated cost. The comparison shall be on the basis of total cost (place of final destination) prices for all goods and all prices, plus cost of inland transportation and insurance to place of destination, for goods manufactured within the Kenya, together with prices for any required installation, training, commissioning and other services. Abnormally Low Tenders An Abnormally Low Tender is one where the Tender price, in combination with other constituent elements of the Tender, appears unreasonably low to the extent that the Tender price raises material concerns with the Procuring Entity as to the capability of the Tenderer to perform the Contract for the offered Tender price. In the event of identification of a potentially Abnormally Low Tender by the evaluation committee, the Procuring Entity shall seek written clarification from the Tenderer, including a detailed price analyses of its Tender price in relation to the subject matter of the contract, scope, delivery schedule, allocation of risks and responsibilities and any other requirements of the tendering document. After evaluation of the price analysis, in the event that the Procuring Entity determines that the Tenderer has failed to demonstrate its capability to perform the contract for the offered Tender price, the Procuring Entity shall reject the Tender. Abnormally High Tenders An abnormally high price is one where the tender price, in combination with other constituent elements of the Tender, appears unreasonably too high to the extent that the Procuring Entity is concerned that it (the Procuring Entity) may not be getting value for money or it may be paying too high a price for the contract compared with market prices or that genuine competition between Tenderers is compromised. In case of an abnormally high tender price, the Procuring Entity shall make a survey of the market prices, check if the estimated cost of the contract is correct and review the Tender Documents to check if the specifications, scope of work and conditions of contract are contributory to the abnormally high tenders. The Procuring Entity may also seek written clarification from the tenderer on the reason for the high tender price. The Procuring Entity shall proceed as follows: If the tender price is abnormally high based on wrong estimated cost of the...
Comparison of Tenders. 31.1 The CGK shall evaluate and compare only the Tenders determined to be substantially responsive in accordance with ITT Clause 28. 31.2 In evaluating the Tenders, the CGK will determine for each Tender the evaluated Tender price by adjusting the Tender price as follows: Making any correction for errors pursuant to ITT Clause 29; Excluding provisional sums and the provision, if any for contingencies in the Bill of Quantities, but including Day work , where priced competitively ; and Making appropriate adjustments to reflect discounts or other price modifications offered in accordance with sub-Clause 24.5. 31.3 The CGK may waive any minor informality or non-conformity, which does not constitute a material deviation, provided such waiver does not prejudice or affect the relative standing of any Tenderer. Variations, deviations, and alternative offers and other factors, which are in excess of the requirements of the Tendering documents or otherwise result in unsolicited benefits for the CGK will not be taken into account in Tender evaluation.
Comparison of Tenders. 34.1 The County Government 0f Bungoma, Through The Department of Health And Sanitation shallcomparetheevaluatedcostsofallsubstantiallyresponsiveTendersestablishedinaccordancew ithITT33.2todeterminetheTenderthathasthelowestevaluatedcost.Thecomparisonshallbeonthe basisoftotalcost(placeoffinaldestination)pricesforallgoodsandallprices,pluscostofinlandtransp ortationandinsurancetoplaceofdestination,forgoodsmanufacturedwithintheKenya,togetherwi thpricesforanyrequiredinstallation,training,commissioningandotherservices.
Comparison of Tenders. 34.1 MCG shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive Tenders established in accordance with ITT 33.2 to determine the Tender that has the lowest evaluated cost. The comparison shall be on the basis of total cost (place of final destination) prices for all goods and all prices, plus cost of inland transportation and insurance to place of destination, for goods manufactured within the Kenya, together with prices for any required installation, training, commissioning and other services.
Comparison of Tenders. The selection of the winning bidder(s) will be made based on the following criteria and coefficients: o Respect of administrative requirements Criteria Points Total Price of Zain Credits (10000+5000) 5 Total Price of Asia, Korek, and Fastlink Credits 4 Total Price of FTTH Credits 1 Payment Terms 2 Delivery mean (to TGH office- Erbil) 3 Analysis grids are presented in Annex 3 and Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Triangle GH reserves the right not to consider any incomplete offer or offers which do not comply with any or all of our tender conditions. Triangle GH reserves the right to accept or reject any part of your offer.
Comparison of Tenders. 2.22.1 The Procuring Entity will evaluate and compare the tenders which have been determined to be substantially responsive, pursuant to paragraph 2.20
