Training Review Sample Clauses

Training Review. 6.3 The Training Provider must not subcontract any aspect of the Pre-Training Review. Subcontracting of training and assessment
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (18)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Training Review. The Training Provider must conduct a Pre-Training Review for each prospective Skills First Student, as part of enrolment, or before the commencement of training, to ascertain a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual to enrol in. The Training Provider must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review. The business process must be consistent with the objectives set out in Clause 3 of this Contract. The Pre-Training Review must: identify the individual's objectives for training and the likely job or further study outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; identify any competencies previously acquired (including through RPL, recognition of current competency (RCC) or credit transfer); consider the individual’s: existing educational attainment and capabilities; literacy and numeracy skills; and digital capability where the proposed learning includes portions of Online Training and Assessment; and identify whether the proposed learning strategies (including Online Training and Assessment) and materials are appropriate for that individual and, where necessary, steps to overcome any barriers. The Training Provider must document why it determined the program each Skills First Student enrolled in was a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual, with reference to the information obtained through considering all items in Clause 4.3 of this Schedule 1. The Training Provider must not enrol a Skills First Student in a program that is at an inappropriate level for that individual, including in Foundation Skills Programs that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol an individual assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. If an audit reveals that any Pre-Training Review has not been completed and documented in accordance with Clauses 4.1 to 4.5 of this Schedule 1, then (without limiting the circumstances in which it may exercise such rights) the Department may exercise its rights under Clauses 16 and 17 of this Contract. For the purpose of the Department exercising its rights under Clause 16.2(e) of this Contract in the circumstances set out in Clause 4.6 of this Schedule 1, the monetary amount will be $200.00 per absent, incomplete or inadequate Pre-Training Review. ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (17)
Training Review. 4.6 For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (14)
Training Review. For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must: identify any competencies previously acquired (Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), Recognition of Current Competency (RCC) or Credit Transfer); ascertain the most appropriate qualification for that student to enrol in, including consideration of the likely job outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; and ascertain that the proposed learning strategies and materials are appropriate for that individual. The RTO must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review that demonstrates how the RTO determined which qualification/s the student enrolled in and why this was the most appropriate training option for that student. The business process and related documentation used by the RTO to conduct the Pre-Training Review must be made available to the Department (or persons authorised by the Department) for audit or review purposes. The RTO must not enrol an Eligible Individual in a course or qualification that is at an inappropriate level for that student, including but not limited to enrolling students in courses on the Foundation Skills List that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol a student assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. The Pre-Training Review must be completed, and the outcomes known and documented, prior to the student’s commencing training. TUITION FEES The RTO must adhere to: the requirements set out in the Guidelines about Fees as issued by the Department and updated from time to time; and any subsequent relevant requirements set out in: a Contract Notification; and/or orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act with respect to the amount, imposition and collection of tuition fees and other fees for government subsidised training and financial and accountability requirements with regards to student fees (Fee Requirements) as if they were set out in the VET Funding Contract. For the avoidance of doubt: Fee Requirements set out in any subsequent Contract Notification or subsequent orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act take priority over ...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
Training Review. For each Eligible Individual, the RTO must conduct a Pre-Training Review of current competencies including literacy and numeracy skills prior to commencement in training. The Pre-Training Review must: identify any competencies previously acquired (Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL), Recognition of Current Competency (RCC) or Credit Transfer); ascertain the most suitable (as defined at Clause 4.1(a)(i) of this VET Funding Contract) qualification for that student to enrol in, based on the individual’s existing educational attainment, capabilities, aspirations and interests and with due consideration of the likely job outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; and ascertain that the proposed learning strategies and materials are appropriate for that individual. The RTO must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review that demonstrates how the RTO determined which qualification/s the student enrolled in and why this was the most suitable training option for that student. The business process and related documentation used by the RTO to conduct the Pre-Training Review must be made available to the Department (or persons authorised by the Department) for audit or review purposes. The RTO must not enrol an Eligible Individual in a course or qualification that is at an inappropriate level for that student, including but not limited to enrolling students in courses on the Foundation Skills List that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol a student assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. The Pre-Training Review must be completed, and the outcomes known and documented, prior to the student’s commencing training. TUITION FEES The RTO must adhere to: the requirements set out in the Guidelines about Fees as issued by the Department and updated from time to time; and any subsequent relevant requirements set out in: a Contract Notification; and/or orders or regulations pursuant to the Act or the National Act with respect to the amount, imposition and collection of tuition fees and other fees for government subsidised training and financial and accountability requirements with regards to student fees (Fee Requirements) as if they were set out in the VET Funding Contract. For the avoidance of doubt: Fe...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Training Review. The necessary training of employees shall be directed to the hazards of the duties to which they are assigned. Such training shall include hazard recognition, safe working procedures, purpose, use, and limitations of special personal protective equipment required and any other appropriate specialized instruction. The Union Co-Chairman of the Joint Safety and Health Committee and the International Union Safety, Health and Environment Department or a designee shall, upon request, be afforded the opportunity to review the training program for all employees at the Plant level. _____________________ _____________________ Company Union
Sample 1
Training Review. You must conduct a Pre-Training Review for each prospective Skills First Student, as part of enrolment, or before the commencement of training, to ascertain a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual to enrol in. You must have a clear and documented business process for conducting the Pre-Training Review. The business process must be consistent with the objectives set out in Clause 3 of this Contract. The Pre-Training Review must: identify the individual's objectives for training and the likely job or further study outcomes from the development of new competencies and skills; identify any competencies previously acquired (including through RPL, recognition of current competency (RCC) or credit transfer); consider the individual’s: existing educational attainment and capabilities; literacy and numeracy skills; and digital capability where the proposed learning includes portions delivered online; and identify whether the proposed learning strategies (including online learning) and materials are appropriate for that individual and, where necessary, steps to overcome any barriers. You must document why you determined the program each Skills First Student enrolled in was a suitable, and the most suitable, program for that individual, with reference to the information obtained through considering all items in Clause 4.3 of this Schedule 1. You must not enrol a Skills First Student in a program that is at an inappropriate level for that individual, including in Foundation Skills Programs that would not provide additional relevant competencies. For example, it would be inappropriate to enrol an individual assessed at Australian Core Skills Framework Level 3 in all core skills areas in either Certificate I in General Education for Adults or Certificate II in Skills for Work and Vocational Pathways. If an audit reveals that any Pre-Training Review has not been completed and documented in accordance with Clauses 4.1 to 4.5 of this Schedule 1, then (without limiting the circumstances in which we may exercise such rights) we may exercise our rights under Clauses 16 and 17 of this Contract. For the purpose of exercising our rights under Clause 16.2(e) of this Contract in the circumstances set out in Clause 4.6 of this Schedule 1, the monetary amount will be $200.00 per absent, incomplete or inadequate Pre-Training Review. Enrolment requirements Before enrolling a prospective Skills First Student, you must inform them that their enrolment is under the...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Training Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Training Program It is agreed that there shall be an Apprenticeship Training Program, the provisions of which are set forth in Exhibit "C", which is attached hereto and forms part of this Agreement.

  • Training Plan Within 90 days after the Effective Date, Good Shepherd shall develop a written plan (Training Plan) that outlines the steps Good Shepherd will take to ensure that: (a) all Covered Persons receive adequate training regarding Good Shepherd’s CIA requirements and Compliance Program, including the Code of Conduct and (b) all Relevant Covered Persons receive adequate training regarding: (i) the Federal health care program requirements regarding eligibility for hospice services upon initial admission, recertification for continued stay, and for Continuous Care, Respite Care, and General Inpatient Care; (ii) the role of physicians in making eligibility determinations; (iii) the accurate coding and submission of claims; (iv) policies, procedures, and other requirements applicable to the documentation of medical records; (v) the personal obligation of each individual involved in the claims submission process to ensure that such claims are accurate; (vi) applicable reimbursement statutes, regulations, and program requirements and directives; (vii) the legal sanctions for violations of the Federal health care program requirements; and (viii) examples of proper and improper eligibility determinations, documentation, and claims submission practices. The Training Plan shall include information regarding the training topics, the categories of Covered Persons and Relevant Covered Persons required to attend each training session, the length of the training, the schedule for training, and the format of the training. Within 30 days of the OIG’s receipt of Good Shepherd’s Training Plan, OIG will notify Good Shepherd of any comments or objections to the Training Plan. Absent notification by the OIG that the Training Plan is unacceptable, Good Shepherd may implement its Training Plan. Good Shepherd shall furnish training to its Covered Persons and Relevant Covered Persons pursuant to the Training Plan during each Reporting Period.

  • Training Programs All employees shall successfully complete all necessary training prior to being assigned work (e.g., all employees will complete health and safety training prior to being assigned to task). Nothing in this Article or provision shall constitute a waiver of either party’s bargaining obligations or defenses. The Employer still has an obligation to notify and bargain changes in terms and conditions of employment with the exclusive representative.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.