Student Evaluation of Teaching Sample Clauses

Student Evaluation of Teaching. ‌ Student evaluation of teaching is designed to provide faculty with a basis for maintaining the quality of the courses and enhancing teaching effectiveness. The Federation accepts the administration's right to conduct student assessment of faculty using a campus-wide assessment instrument which will be mutually agreed upon in the Federation Administration Committee and voted on by the faculty. A college may not make additions or deletions to the institutional instrument. However, additional instruments may be administered by college faculty. (The agreed upon instrument which is included as Attachment A shall be used until replaced by a new mutually agreed upon instrument.)
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Student Evaluation of Teaching. ‌ Each appropriate unit of the faculty shall make provisions for student evaluation of faculty teaching through the use of a standard evaluation form established by the University. The unit may also include a form which has been developed for the specific use of that unit. Units that choose to include a supplemental form must develop and periodically review the evaluation form in coordination with the unit’s policy, executive, or other appropriate representative faculty body in the unit. The results of the evaluations, including from the unit’s unique evaluation form, shall be made available to the individual, to the unit committee(s) charged with making personnel decisions (to include, but not limited to, renewal, tenure, promotions, and salary adjustments), and to the chair and other appropriate administrative officers for the purpose of assessing the individual’s teaching performance and for the purpose of program review. However, data from student evaluations will not be the only basis for comparisons between units. Faculty may also submit supplementary teaching materials (up to seven [7] items), in addition to student evaluations of teaching to the unit committee(s) charged with making personnel decisions (to include, but not limited to, renewal, tenure, promotions, and salary adjustments). Faculty may also submit them to the chair and other appropriate administrative officers for the purpose of assessing the individual’s teaching performance and for the purpose of program review. The anonymity of the students shall be preserved. A committee composed of three (3) members appointed by the Association and three (3) members appointed by the University shall serve as an advisory board to the Xxxxxxx; and shall consider and make recommendations on revisions in the Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET). The University and the Association shall each appoint one (1) member of the committee to serve as co-chairs. The committee shall also consider requests for waivers from the use of the SET, or proposals for alterations in the SET. Each appointing entity should appoint, among its appointees, some person having expertise in evaluation. If the committee makes recommendations that the Xxxxxxx is not prepared to implement, these differences will be discussed with the committee. If there is not a satisfactory resolution to these differences, the current standard form shall remain in use.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Student Evaluation of Teaching. Each appropriate unit of the faculty shall make provisions for student evaluation of faculty teaching through the use of a standard evaluation form established by the University. The unit may also include a form which has been developed for the specific use of that unit. The results of the evaluations shall be made available to the individual, to the unit committee(s) charged with making personnel decisions (to include, but not limited to, renewal, tenure, promotions, and salary adjustments), and to the chair and other appropriate administrative officers for the purpose of assessing the individual’s teaching performance and for the purpose of program review. However, data from student evaluations will not be the only basis for comparisons between units. The anonymity of the students shall be preserved. A joint committee composed of three (3) members appointed by the Association and three (3) members appointed by the University shall serve as an advisory board to the Xxxxxxx in the development and use of standard forms and other instruments for student evaluation of teaching. The committee shall also consider requests for waivers from the use of the standard instrument, or proposals for alterations in the standard instrument. Each appointing entity should appoint, among its appointees, some person having expertise in evaluation. If the committee makes recommendations to the Xxxxxxx that s/he is not prepared to implement, s/he will first discuss these differences with the committee. If there is not a satisfactory resolution to the differences, the current standard form shall remain in use.
Sample 1Sample 2
Student Evaluation of Teaching. All courses taught as part of the public health curriculum, as reviewed and approved by the UMN/SPH educational policy committee, require the completion of an end-of-semester/course evaluation by students (including  /CVM Students) according to UMN/SPH customs and University of Minnesota standards. Such evaluations are required to assess the performance of both regular and adjunct faculty and to improve the academic quality of the Program. Evaluations will be provided to the faculty member and to the PHP major chair, who may share them with executive faculty or other responsible parties.
Sample 1
Student Evaluation of Teaching. Student evaluation of teaching (SET) instrument shall be administered as recommended by the Joint AAUP- University Committee on Student Evaluation of Teaching and approved by the Association and the University. SET results are to be regarded as but one source of information about a faculty member’s teaching.
Sample 1
Student Evaluation of Teaching. Each faculty member will be evaluated for each course each semester. Non-tenured faculty members shall be evaluated each semester. Tenured faculty members shall be evaluated according to the following schedule: Last names beginning with letters During academic years beginning with an even-numbered year During academic years beginning with an odd-numbered year A-M Fall Semester Spring Semester Tenured faculty may volunteer for evaluation in a semester during which they are not scheduled to be evaluated by notifying the Administration in writing no later than the end of the fourth week of the semester. Voluntary evaluations of tenured faculty will not be included in the Official Personnel File unless submitted by the faculty member with a written request for inclusion. All student evaluations of teaching shall be subject to the exclusions specified in 14.3. Faculty members who team-teach shall be evaluated individually on the same basis as a faculty member teaching a course individually.
Sample 1
Student Evaluation of Teaching. Student evaluations are done once per term to give instructors an idea of how they are being perceived by their students. Evaluations of part-time instructional faculty are conducted in an online format after the last day for students to withdraw from the course. Results of the student evaluations, including all comments, will be provided to faculty at the end of the term or after grades have been finalized by the registrar’s office for that course. The student evaluation criteria serve as a basis for evaluation, along with the administrative evaluator’s assessment of the presentation to the student during classroom visitation.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Student Evaluation of Teaching

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 11.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.