Basis for Evaluation Clause Samples

Basis for Evaluation. A. The FEC and Chair shall rate faculty members being evaluated as (a) normal, (b) above normal/outstanding, or (c) less than normal in accordance with Section 10.110 of the CBA and the criteria in this section. B. The CBA Section 10.110 description of “normal" is (Section 10.110, 3b): The performance of a majority of faculty members will generally be evaluated as "normal." They will be expected to grow in valueto the institution and will be rewarded with a "normal" increment to their salary. C. The overarching normal criteria for teaching effectiveness are (a) to carry a standard departmental teaching load (unless areassignment of teaching has been approved), and (b) be effective in teaching. 1. A standard load will vary depending on the number of faculty members, the number of courses offered, etc., but, in general, a standard load is approximately the number of courses offered divided by the number of faculty members. 2. Judgment of effectiveness is largely subjective; usually an effective teacher can be recognized by (a) the choice of subject matter and emphasis (i.e. how well the instruction prepares the students for subsequent courses and how well it fulfills the students’ career objectives), (b) systematic organization, (c) performance in helping students learn both in and out of the classroom, (d) the degree to which course material is kept current, (e) judicious experimentation with teaching effectiveness, and (f) rigor, fairness, and thoroughness of assessment and evaluation procedures. Judgment of teaching effectiveness will be based upon student evaluations, inspection of the curriculum, opinions solicited from alumni, and faculty classroom visitations if deemed appropriate by the Chair or the FEC. 3. The department recognizes that faculty members may be assigned to teach courses that may or may not be part of the general education curriculum of the university. Whether or not a course is assigned a general education designation will have no bearing on a faculty member's teaching evaluation outside of the criteria for judgment of effectiveness listed in II. C. 2. D. The overarching normal criteria for research/creative activity effectiveness are based on demonstrable evidence (publications and presentations) that (a) the research has made apositive contribution to the body of knowledge and has received national or international recognition, (b) the faculty member has played a significant leadership role in the conduct of the research, and (c) th...

Basis for Evaluation. This factor considers the past performance of the offeror’s proposed General Contractor and A/E on SPs. For this evaluation factor, Similar Project (SP) means a project that meets all the following: ● Construction was substantially completed within eight years prior to the submission deadline for Phase 1 proposals. ● The SP was contracted using the design-build delivery method. ● Renovation of an existing building for use as an office. ● Project area was not less than 100,000 gross square feet; and ● Contract cost at award was greater than or equal to $20 million.

Basis for Evaluation. The Department shall evaluate the Contractor’s performance using the output and outcome measures contained in this section as well as the Contractor’s compliance with the terms and conditions herein. Such performance shall be based upon monitoring reports from Department staff and or its third-party contractor. Items to be monitored will include: compliance with licensing standards; compliance with service level standards; and the child’s progress in achieving any applicable behavioral goals as required by Texas Administrative Code, Title 1, Part 15, Chapter 351, Rule 351.13.

Basis for Evaluation. The objective of this factor is to evaluate the extent to which the Design Concept evidences a satisfactory probability that the Offeror will be able to satisfy the minimum performance requirements set forth in the RFP for Phase 2. Offeror should submit the following: