Design Quality Objectives Sample Clauses

Design Quality Objectives. A key part of the development of the Initial Agreement Document was to ensure that stakeholders were fully engaged in the NHS Scotland Design Assessment Process (NDAP). There were two key strands to this work;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design Quality Objectives. As detailed within the SCIM guidance, all preferred strategic/service solutions are likely to need a designed physical solution. The process of developing design objectives has commenced and a multi-stakeholder review of existing property arrangements was carried in September 2017 to establish a benchmark score for each facility and setting a target score from which design expectation can be measured [see appendix 22: Diagram 1: Denburn Achieving Excellence in Design Evaluation Toolkit [AEDET] Benchmark Summary, Diagram 2: Northfield AEDET Benchmark Summary and Diagram 3: Mastrick AEDET Benchmarking Summary. As per the AEDET Refresh guidance, the requirements of the IA stage have been met in that an AEDET workshop was held using the generic question set only, to achieve Target and Benchmark scores. Due to difficulties in arranging a suitable date for this workshop, this has only just been completed and has now been submitted via the NHSScotland Design Assessment Process (NDAP). A summary table detailing the benchmark and target for each facility is included within Appendix 22. The diagrams detail the benchmark scores for each facility and the target score for the project. Further AEDET workshops will be carried out at OBC and FBC stages and Post Occupancy Evaluation (XXX) stages where a combination of AEDET and project specific Design Statements will be used.
Design Quality Objectives. The Design Statement is the first design control document produced for this programme and is consistent with NHS Xxxxxxx’s overall vision contained within the strategic Design Action Plan. Design Statements will be used as a tool for briefing, communication, and programme promotion to describe the design intention/vision. They will subsequently be developed into the design brief, supplemented by more detailed briefing materials such as schedules of accommodation, key adjacencies, and room data sheets. The Design Statement sets out NHS Xxxxxxx’s objectives for the REH campus development in a series of agreed statements of intent drawn up by a representative group of stakeholders. It then defines benchmarks that will be used as reference points to measure design proposals against. The third part of the Design Statement is a plan of action that describes how the objectives and benchmarks will be used at key decision points throughout the programme from the development and consideration of the business case through to the eventual evaluation of the programme’s success. In conjunction with Design Statements this programme will use the Achieving Excellence Design Evaluation Tool (AEDET) to assess design quality throughout the procurement process and evaluate how successfully the design responds to the following objectives: • Impact - the buildings need to create a sense of place and contribute positively to the lives of those who use them and are their neighbours. • Build Quality - in terms of the technical and engineering aspects, the buildings need to be soundly built, easy to operate, and sustainable. Build quality also covers the actual process of construction and the extent to which any disruption caused is minimised. • Functionality - the buildings need to serve their primary purpose and facilitate the activities of the people who carry out the functions inside and around the buildings. A Design Statement for mental health and learning disability services is described in Section B (para 3.2). This will be used for the services in the first phase of the programme. Further Design Statements will be developed to reflect the needs and objectives for other services that transfer to the REH campus in later phases of the scheme. As well as efficient use of energy, water, waste management NHS Lothian aims to make more efficient use of its asset base and dispose of surplus assets as part of the NHS Lothian’s Property and Infrastructure Strategy.
Design Quality Objectives. 3.1. The use of AEDET will help assess the Design quality and suitability both at this early Initial Agreement stage throughout the life of the project by repeating the assessment at various key milestones including at the Business Case stage and during any Post Project Evaluation. AEDET stands for Architectural Excellence in Design Evaluation Toolkit and was principally developed for use with Framework Scotland and Procure 21 projects in the NHS.
Design Quality Objectives. The use of AEDET will help assess the Design quality and suitability both at this early Initial Agreement stage throughout the life of the project by repeating the assessment at various key milestones including at the Business Case stage and during any Post Project Evaluation. AEDET stands for Architectural Excellence in Design Evaluation Toolkit and was principally developed for use with Framework Scotland and Procure 21 projects in the NHS. The toolkit provides a methodology for evaluating the quality of design in healthcare buildings and can be used for refurbishment projects as well as for new builds plans. It is divided into 10 sections which have set questions that are weighted depending on the type of project and then scored with regards to the specific project proposals. The option to be chosen to carry out this exercise will follow the guidance in the adoption of a workshops type arrangement. An AEDET assessment will be carried out once the Design Team has been appointed and a practical scheme design has been developed.
Design Quality Objectives. An AEDET review has been carried out on the existing facilities (both Operating Theatre and Xxxx). The summary results of the workshop are included in Figure 39 below. Figure 39 - Existing Facilities and Arrangements - AEDET scores As per Scottish Government guidance, all projects with a value of over £5m are required to develop a Design Assessment Statement. The development of a Design Statement is intended to assist NHS Scotland Boards in using good design to get the most out of their development projects. The Design Statement is a means of setting out the Board’s objectives for an individual project in a series of agreed statements of intent and then defining a benchmark for how the physical result of the project will help deliver those objectives. The benchmarks should not require a pre-determined design outcome, but provide the parameters for what success might look like. The third part of the Design Statement is a plan of action for how the objectives and benchmarks established for the project will inform key decisions throughout the project including the development and consideration of the business case, and the eventual evaluation of the project’s success. The following summarises the objectives in the design statement that must be present in the development:
Design Quality Objectives 
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Design Quality Objectives

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

  • Quality Specifications SANMINA-SCI shall comply with the quality specifications set forth in its Quality Manual, incorporated by reference herein, a copy of which is available from SANMINA-SCI upon request.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both parties to this agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Quality of Services (a) The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of all designs, drawings, specifications, and other services furnished pursuant to this Agreement.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).

  • Goals & Objectives 1. The goal of this Agreement is (INSERT GOAL(S) OF AGREEMENT).

  • Targets and Milestones Comparing the relative performance of different groups to the over or under- representation within the institution and taking into account our current performance in our Access Agreement milestones, areas for particular focus include: Low Participating Neighbourhoods; Low income groups; Target groups to include gender, disability and care leavers; Black and minority ethnic (BME) group attainment; Completion rates. As a result of the analysis of our performances, our access, success and progression interventions will concentrate on the following: Continuation of involvement in collaborative outreach activity via the KMPF and the Kent and Medway Collaborative Network (KMCNet) as part of the National Network for Collaborative Outreach (NNCO); Recognition of the importance of carefully targeted activity; The use of serial rather than one-off interventions; The importance of long-term outreach to include the whole student lifecycle; The helpfulness of Higher Education Access Tracker (HEAT) for evaluating the impact of interventions; The importance of a whole institution approach; The importance of student attendance monitoring; Ease of access to information and student welfare support; An increasing emphasis on evaluation of activities across the student lifecycle; Accessibility of employability advice and support. Given our relatively strong record to date for widening access and student success, most of the targets seek to maintain, and where possible improve, this performance within a more challenging financial environment. Such targets may be especially challenging and stretching in relation to the access of those from Low Participating Neighbourhoods (LPNs), given the demographic decline in the number of young people (aged 18-21) in the population and the University’s already high recruitment levels from these groups. We have removed the University’s NS-SEC target in response to the UK Performance Indicator Steering Group announcement that HESA will no longer be publishing the NS-SEC indicator after 2016. As we already have LPN and Household Income targets in place we shall not be replacing this target with an alternative. We have reviewed our success targets and added new progression targets for 2017. There was a concern in the institution that our internal reporting did not allow for national and regionally adjusted benchmark comparison. We have therefore made the following adjustments to our success targets: Non-continuation two years following year of entry: part-time first degree entrants – all entrants: Replacing the OFFA agreement target with the similar data from HESA allows for national benchmarking to be undertaken in order to ensure that the University is maintaining its commitment to these students. We aim to keep our non-continuation rate in this area below our HESA benchmark rate. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – mature entrants: Changing the target to clearly focus on mature full-time first degree students (to match the national HESA data) ensures that we focus our efforts on this section of the student population and for the outcomes to be compared with HESA benchmarks rather than internally produced data. We aim to ensure that this student population’s non-continuation rate is at or below the HESA benchmark rate by 2020/21. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – all entrants: In order to ensure that young students are not disadvantaged by the focus on mature entrants, the University will also commit to maintaining the overall non-continuation rate for all students at or below the HESA benchmark. BME: the University will replace the current phrasing of the target around BME success with a more explicit aim of reducing the success gap experienced by BME students. Progression: the University has added a progression target that aims to keep us around or above the sector benchmark for the Employment Indicator from the DLHE survey. Combined targets from the collaborative KMPF project (agreed by all partners) are to raise applications and subsequent conversions to higher education from within the target schools and colleges in LPNs. These targets will need to be reviewed in the coming years to reflect changes to GCSE grading in schools. Our institutional and collaborative targets are included in tables 7a and 7b respectively.

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones:

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer provides refrigerated warehousing and logistic distribution services to clients throughout the United States. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to invest in a new refrigeration and distribution facility in the XxXxxxxxx Park area of Sacramento, California, and hire full-time employees (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit A (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of full-time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the salaries of any of the full-time employees hired within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Salary of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the salary of any full-time employee that is not employed by Taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, the salary of any full-time employee hired to fill a vacated position in which a full-time employee was employed during Taxpayer’s Base Year shall be disregarded.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.