Competitive Comparison Sample Clauses

Competitive Comparison. The CDV competitive advantage for LMS is that it offers a one stop health management point of contact for LMS diabetic clients. There is an epidemic growth in obesity in the US population (figure 2) and the rise in obesity has been correlated to the rise in type II diabetes. A weight management program to LMS clients that offers prevention, control and maintenance provides a lifetime proactive health insurance against the health risks of being overweight. LMS clients have already decided to economically manage their health concerns by selecting LMS as their medical supplier. The CDV further offers these clients a means of economically managing one of the leading risk factors for type II diabetes for the long term. The benefits to LMS clients by reduced health risk will translate into other LMS intangibles as increased brand loyalty. The competitive advantage to LMS CDV partners include access to a niche database of high potential clients and reduced SGA overhead.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Competitive Comparison. 3 - 4 3.3 Labor Force .......................................4 3.4
Competitive Comparison. We are the first and sole inventor of this automotive control system technology. As this is a new concept and a entirely new invention, having all its rights and patents with Brain Chamber, there is no competing product in the global market, nor is there any such product in development anywhere else in the world.
Competitive Comparison. No direct competitive products exist on the market today similar to the SmartScanner. Other electronics companies that target clothing retailers offer maintenance agreements so customers are familiar and accustomed to purchasing such add-ons. These companies include those selling cash registers, time and attendance systems, and general office equipment. This familiarity in the industry may xxxxxx customer interest in purchasing a maintenance agreement for the SmartScanner.
Competitive Comparison. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx competes with numerous other companies for customers. Many of these competitors provide similar services. However, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx believes that its reputation for quality service, and its long-established relationships with existing clients, will allow it to maintain and expand its current level of sales despite the increasingly competitive environment.
Competitive Comparison. Iron Ore Spot pricing: • Spot pricing is based on CNF China port for "Iron ore Fines". [Lower-grade sources of iron ore generally require beneficiation, using techniques like crushing, milling, gravity or heavy media separation, screening, and silica froth flotation to improve the concentration of the ore and remove impurities. The results, high-quality fine ore powders, are known as Fines.] - GIO's hematite ore lends itself for lump production much favored by steel producers. Therefore, Lump ore achieves premium over pricing for Fines.
Competitive Comparison. The travel agency market is competitive, and technology, namely the Internet has changed the way travel agencies and companies operate. The Internet gives agencies and individuals the ability to perform travel related research. industry competition and the increased number of travel options available have made it necessary for smaller travel agencies to establish themselves as specialists in one or more types of travel. Finally Voyage has done this by positioning itself as a virtual travel specialist.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Competitive Comparison. Hedge fund industry assets hit a new peak of $2.702 trillion as of March 31, 2014 the seventh consecutive quarter of record-breaking net growth, according to new data from Hedge Fund Research. Assets growth in the first quarter was 2.8%, up from $2.628 trillion as of Dec. 31, HFR said in its most recent research report. HFR noted that net inflows in the three-month period ended March 31 were the highest quarterly inflows since second quarter 2011 when net inflows totaled $32.5 billion. If the current pace of new money entering the hedge fund industry continues for the remaining three quarters of 2014, net inflows for the calendar year will top $105 billion, making it the best year since 2007, when net asset growth totaled $195 billion, historical HFR data showed. Aggregate hedge fund returns were more than 9% in 2013, the best annual return in the past three years, according to data from Hedge Fund Research and eVestment. HFR reported that the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite index returned 9.3% for the year ended Dec. 31, the best annual performance since the index returned 20% in 2010. eVestment on the other hand, reports the average return of the hedge funds that report to its database was 9.2%. Returns of the eVestment Aggregate were 7.4% in 2012; -3.1%, 2011; and 10.5%, 2011. By comparison, the S&P 500 index's one-year return as of Dec. 31, 2013 was 32.2%; MSCI All- Country World index, 23.5%; and Barclays Aggregate Bond index, -2%. XXXXXX's performance results for 2013 for Balanced, Growth and Advantage portfolios was 40.96%, 69.9%, and 159% respectively and for Q1'2014 are 9.2%, 15.2% and 30.7% respectively (See Factsheets in Appendix Section). Despite hedge funds having suffered the worst performance start to the year since 2011, industry assets hit a new peak of $2.7 trillion thanks to healthy net inflows. First-quarter 2014 returns of other major hedge fund indexes also were low compared to previous years, led by the 1.5% return of the Xxxxxxxxx Hedge Fund index, and followed by the Barclay Hedge Fund index, 1.4%; Preqin All Hedge Fund Strategies index, 1.2%; Eurekahedge Hedge Fund index, 0.9%; and the Lyxor Hedge Fund index, 0.5%. The eVestment database’s Hedge Fund Aggregate return was 1.2% for the three- month period. The HFRI Hedge Fund index, for example, was down 0.5% in January, up 2% in February and down 0.3% in March. In view of the above, whilst there is ample capital inflow, performance plays a major role in attracting capital. All of XXXX...
Competitive Comparison. There are no real dominant players in this very specific market. Although having emerged from the recession relatively unharmed, the Food and Beverage industry turned around in 2010 and has experienced rapid growth. Revenue growth has been slow, however, hampered by shaky consumer confidence and stubbornly high unemployment, meaning people have been more content to xxxx at home. Big Ma’s Kitchen directly addresses the changing customer preferences with its southern approach that essentially allows customers to experience a more exotic array of flavors for snacking that also provides health and wellness options for their increasingly adventurous palates. Also, our digital ordering services and social media platforms seek to connect on the tech-savvy millennial generation to provide robust research avenues, tips, stories, forums and such for the information-hungry consumer. There is no place in Boston like Big Ma’s Kitchen. Market survey revealed 100% positive feedback and enthusiasm for future patronage of Big Ma’s Kitchen. At least 100 people belonging to each target market who are either working in the Boston area or live in the city and nearby neighborhoods were surveyed in the first quarter of 2019.

Related to Competitive Comparison

  • Competitive Business The term “Competitive Business” means any person or entity that engages in any business activity that competes with the Company’s or an Affiliate’s or Subsidiary’s business in any way, in any geographic area in which the Company or an Affiliate or Subsidiary engages in business, including, without limitation, any state in the United States in which the Company or an Affiliate or Subsidiary sells or offers to sell its products from time to time.

  • Competitive Products Competitive Products" means products that serve the same function as, or that could be used to replace, products the Company provided to, offered to, or was in the process of developing for a present, former, or future possible customer/partner at any time during the twelve (12) months immediately preceding the last day of Participant's employment (or at any time during Participant's employment if Participant was employed for less than 12 months), with which Participant had direct responsibility for the sale or development of such products or managing those persons responsible for the sale or development of such products.

  • Competitors The Owner shall possess, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the following restrictions: (check one) ☐ - No Restrictions on Competitors.

  • Competitive Activities During the term of this Agreement, Consultant will not, directly or indirectly, in any individual or representative capacity, engage or participate in or provide services to any business that is competitive with the types and kinds of business being conducted by Company.

  • Competitive Activity Executive shall be deemed to have engaged in "Competitive Activity" if, during the period commencing on the date hereof and ending on the second anniversary of the date Executive's employment with the Company or its subsidiaries terminates, (i) Executive, for himself or on behalf of any other person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity, engages, directly or indirectly, as an executive, agent, representative, consultant, partner, shareholder or holder of any other financial interest, in any business that competes with the Company or its subsidiaries in the line of business Executive is employed in by the Company or its subsidiaries (as applicable), as such business is described in any employment or severance agreement then in effect between Executive and the Company or one of its subsidiaries or, if no such agreement is then in effect, as described on Schedule II attached hereto (a "Competing Business"), it being understood and agreed that Executive's activities shall not satisfy this clause (i) where Executive is employed by a person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other entity engaged in a variety of activities, including the Competing Business, and Executive is not engaged in or responsible for the Competing Business of such entity. Executive may also, without satisfying clause (i) be a passive owner of not more than 2% of the outstanding publicly traded stock of any class of a Competing Business so long as Executive has no active participation in the business of such entity, except to the extent permitted above; or (ii) Executive (A) directly or indirectly through another entity, induces or attempts to induce any employee of the Company or its subsidiaries to leave the employ of the Company or its subsidiaries, or in any way interfere with the relationship between the Company or any of its subsidiaries and any employee thereof, (B) knowingly hires any person who was an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries within 180 days prior to the time such employee was hired by Executive, (C) induces or attempts to induce any customer, supplier, licensee or other business relation of the Company or any of its subsidiaries to cease doing business with the Company or its subsidiaries or in any way interfere with the relationship between any such customer, supplier, licensee or business relation and the Company or any subsidiary or (D) directly or indirectly acquires or attempt to acquire an interest in any business relating to the business of the Company or any of its subsidiaries and with which the Company or any of its subsidiaries has entertained discussions or has requested and received information relating to the acquisition of such business by the Company or its subsidiaries in the one-year period immediately preceding Executive's termination of employment with the Company.

  • ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR Contractor will not collude, in any manner, or engage in any practice which may restrict or eliminate competition or otherwise restrain trade.

  • Competitive Terms 22.4.1 If the Contracting Body is able to obtain from any Sub-Contractor or any other third party more favourable commercial terms with respect to the supply of any materials, equipment, software, goods or services used by the Supplier or the Supplier Personnel in the supply of the Goods and/or Services, then the Authority may:

  • Competitor “Competitor” means any person, firm, business or other organization or entity that designs, develops, produces, offers for sale or sells products that are in competition with the products of the Company or an Affiliate as designed, developed, produced, offered for sale or sold by the Company or an Affiliate at the time of Executive’s Separation from Service.

  • Competing Business “Competing Business” means any depository, wealth management or trust business company or holding company thereof (including without limitation, any start-up bank or bank in formation) operating anywhere within the Covered Area.

  • Other Business Opportunities The Member and any person or entity affiliated with the Member may engage in or possess an interest in other business opportunities or ventures (unconnected with the Company) of every kind and description, independently or with others, including, without limitation, businesses that may compete with the Company. Neither the Member or any person or entity affiliated with the Member shall be required to present any such business opportunity or venture to the Company, even if the opportunity is of the character that, if presented to the Company, could be taken by it. Neither the Company nor any person or entity affiliated with the Company shall have any rights in or to such business opportunities or ventures or the income or profits derived therefrom by virtue of this Agreement, notwithstanding any duty otherwise existing at law or in equity. The provisions of this Section shall apply to the Member solely in its capacity as member of the Company and shall not be deemed to modify any contract or arrangement, including, without limitation, any noncompete provisions, otherwise agreed to by the Company and the Member.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.