Performance Results Sample Clauses

Performance Results. (a) For each Performance Requirement, the number of RSUs that vest based on the achievement of that Performance Requirement’s Performance Goals at Threshold, at Target and at Maximum is the Performance Component Range of RSUs set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate at Threshold, at Target and at Maximum, respectively, multiplied by that Performance Requirement’s Weighting, rounded down to the nearest whole number.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Results. ‌ The current section summarizes the achieved performance results w.r.t. through- put and size. We depict in Tables 4 and 5 the performance figures of the works described in Sect. 2. As mentioned, we outperform prior art on the same archi- tecture between 2.5 and 21.2 times [23]. Table 4. PRESENT implementations, comparison with prior art (performance) Work Implementation Bitslicing Bitslicing factor Protected Platform No. cycles per block This work PRESENT-80 yes 32 yes ARM Cortex–M4 6,532 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC no - no ATmega 121,906 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC no - no MSP430 100,786 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC no - no ARM Cortex-M3 138,947 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR no - no ATmega 15,239 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR no - no MSP430 12,226 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR no - no ARM 16,919 [37] PRESENT-80 no - no ATiny 8,721 [41] PRESENT-80 yes 8 no ATMega163 78,403 [41] PRESENT-80, DPL yes 8 yes ATMega163 235,427 [38] PRESENT-80 yes 8 no ATiny85 2,967 [5] PRESENT-80, table no - no Corei3-2367M 988 [5] PRESENT-80, vperm yes 2 no Corei3-2367M 890 [5] PRESENT-80 yes 8 no Corei3-2367M 2,039 [5] PRESENT-80 yes 16 no Corei3-2367M 3,138 [34] PRESENT-80 yes 32 no Xeon E3-1280 37.84 [34] PRESENT-80 yes 16 no Xeon E3-1280 52.16 [34] PRESENT-80 yes 8 no Xeon E3-1280 67.68 [17] PRESENT-80 no - no MSP430 364,587 [39] PRESENT-80 no - no ATAM893-D 55,734 [39] PRESENT-80 no - no ATMega163 10,089 [39] PRESENT-80 no - no C167CR 19,460 As expected, the ISW implementation of the Sbox dominated CPU time, accounting for 95,88% of all clock cycles within the encryption process. A com- plete breakdown of the memory and time overheads required for different mod- ules is provided in Table 6. Table 5. PRESENT implementations, comparison with prior art (size) Work Implementation Code (bytes) RAM (bytes) This work PRESENT-80 1,548 1,644 [38] PRESENT-80 3,816 256 [39] PRESENT-80, ATMega 1,494 272 [39] PRESENT-80, C167CR 3 45.9·10 - [23] PRESENT-80, CBC, ATMega 1,388 56 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC, MSP430 1,108 52 [23] PRESENT-80, CBC, ARM 1,304 124 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR, ATMega 1,416 54 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR, MSP430 1,244 58 [23] PRESENT-80, CTR, ARM 1,532 140 [37] PRESENT-80 1,794 - [41] PRESENT-80, bitslicing 1,620 288 [41] PRESENT-80, bitslicing + DPL 3,056 352 Table 6. SW transformations of common logical operations Operation Code size (%) No. cycles (%) main 208 (13.44) 3,807 (1.82) sbox 892 (57.62) 200,404 (95.88) updatekey 146 (9.43) 1,688 (0.81) addroundkey 176 (11.37) 1,209 (0.58) split data 60 (3.88) 1,292 (0.62) unsplit dat...
Sample 1
Performance Results. (a) For each Performance Requirement, the Number of Shares that vest and become Earned Shares based on the achievement of that Performance Requirement’s Performance Goals at threshold, target and maximum is equal to the product of (i) the Number of Shares subject to the Award; (ii) the Performance Range set forth in the Participant’s Award Certificate at threshold, target or maximum, respectively; and (iii) the Performance Requirement’s Weighting Percentage, rounded down to a whole number.
Sample 1
Performance Results. A review of the results of the Organizational Performance Improvement Snapshot Assessment reveals that in the category of business results scores ranged from 3.1 to 4.3. The item with the highest score in this category indicates that faculty and staff are satisfied with their job within Instructional Systemwide. These results indicate that the faculty and staff do not understand the school budget and would benefit from opportunities that allow for the sharing of budget information. GOAL 1: READING Alignment of Objective to the Florida Department of Education and the District Strategic Plan Florida Education Priorities (1000.3(5)(a)-(f), F.S.) Learning and completion at all levels, including increased high school graduation and readiness for postsecondary education Student Performance Alignment of Standards and Resources Educational Leadership Workforce Education Parental, Student, Family, Educational Institution, and Community Involvement Miami-Dade County Public Schools District Strategic Plan Ensure achievement of high academic standards by all students. Develop our students so that they are able to successfully compete in the global economy. Actively engage family and community members to become our partners in raising and maintaining high student achievement. Reform business practices to ensure efficiency, effectiveness and high ethical standards. Recruit, develop and retain high-performing, diverse, and motivated faculty and staff.
Sample 1
Performance Results. A review of the resutls of the Organizational Performance Improvement Snapshot Assessment reveals that in the category of performance results scores ranged from 3.2 to 4.5. The item with the highest score in this category indicates that faculty and staff are satisfied with their job within Instructional Systemwide. The item with the lowest score is related to to knowing about the financial status of the school. The results seem to indicate that the faculty and staff do not understand the school budget and would benefit from opportunities which allow for the sharing budget information. GOAL 1: READING Alignment of Objective to the Florida Department of Education and the District Strategic Plan Florida Education Priorities (1000.3(5)(a)-(f), F.S.) Learning and completion at all levels, including increased high school graduation and readiness for postsecondary education Student Performance Alignment of Standards and Resources Educational Leadership Workforce Education Parental, Student, Family, Educational Institution, and Community Involvement Miami-Dade County Public Schools District Strategic Plan Ensure achievement of high academic standards by all students. Develop our students so that they are able to successfully compete in the global economy. Actively engage family and community members to become our partners in raising and maintaining high student achievement. Reform business practices to ensure efficiency, effectiveness and high ethical standards. Recruit, develop and retain high-performing, diverse, and motivated faculty and staff.
Sample 1

Related to Performance Results

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Performance Reports None Specified

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Performance Data In accordance with section 34(2)(n) of the Act the EMHS is required to provide performance data for the monthly production of the performance reports as required by the Department CEO.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Performance Measure The specific representation of a process or outcome that is relevant to the assessment of performance; it is quantifiable and can be documented

  • Performance Monitoring A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives.

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.