Assessment and review. A review of this data sharing agreement will take place after 6 months and then annually, unless otherwise agreed by the organisations’ Data Protection Officers. The aim of the review will be to ensure the purposes are still relevant, the scope has not slipped, the benefits to the data subjects and organisations are being realised, and the procedures followed for information security are effective. Changes in legislation and developments in the areas of public sector data sharing will be considered as and when they arise, as will any changes to the signatory parties. The working group who drafted this agreement strongly recommends that a working group approach is used for any reviews, as this was a successful way to achieve pan-London and cross-specialism consensus to one sharing agreement.
Assessment and review. 8.1 A review of the information sharing agreement will take place every six months after the agreement date of this document through the [insert the owner of this agreement], who has responsibility for the governance of the agreement. This will assess the success of the agreement and the procedures followed for effective information security management. Changes in legislation and developments in the areas of public sector data sharing will be taken into account if and when they arise.
Assessment and review. A review of this information sharing agreement will take place after six months and yearly thereafter, unless otherwise agreed by the organisations’ Data Protection Officers. The aim of the review will be to ensure the purposes are still relevant, the scope has not changed, the benefits to the data subjects and organisations are being realised, and the procedures followed for information security are effective. The agreement will therefore also be reviewed if relevant learning is identified by the London Resilience Partnership from the debrief of a Major Incident or Emergency affecting London. Changes in legislation and developments in the areas of public sector data sharing will be considered as and when they arise, as will any changes to the signatory parties. Specifically, any revision of ‘HM Government 2021 Data Sharing in Emergency Preparedness, Response and Recovery. Non-statutory guidance on the sharing of Personal and Special Category Data during all phases of an emergency will be considered. The working group who drafted this agreement strongly recommend that a working group approach is used for any reviews, as this was a successful way to achieve pan-London and cross-specialism consensus to a single data sharing agreement. The review working group will be facilitated by London Resilience Group. All organisations party to the agreement will be invited to participate (either directly or represented on a sector basis as per the London Resilience Forum structure). Any other relevant organisations will also be invited e.g. those involved in making use of the Agreement in response to an emergency which has prompted the need for the Agreement to be reviewed.
Assessment and review. 5.1 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties pertaining to Abstracts & Indexes. Only a written instrument signed by all parties may amend it. [A separate signature page will be provided for signature, return and digital filing at the Boston Library Consortium office.] Boston Library Consortium Collaborative Archiving of Science Abstracts & Indexes Memorandum of Understanding Agreement Contract March 1, 2019 – December 31, 2034 This form is to be signed by (1) Director, Five Colleges, Incorporated [Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, Five Colleges, Incorporated] and (2) the Library Xxxx/Director of each institution participating in the MOU: You and your staff are committed to the Terms and Conditions listed in the Boston Library Consortium Collaborative Archiving of Science Abstracts & Indexes Memorandum of Understanding. This MOU allows for the maximizing of access to essential information resources while releasing shelf space for all participants. agrees that Library Xxxx/Director Institution will participate in this agreement through December 31, 2034. This signed agreement signifies our intent to support the policies outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding beginning March 1, 2019. Date signed: Xxxx/Director: Please email or fax a scanned copy of the separate signature page (included in this email) to Xxxxx Xxxxxxx (xxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx). She will sign for the BLC and return a copy of the completed document for your records. Note: The Chemistry Community of Interest assumes responsibility for sending a reminder to the Heads of Resource Management every three years (with the first one dated March 1, 2022). Memorandum of Understanding for “Boston Library Consortium Collaborative Archiving of Science Abstracts & Indexes” Agreement March 1, 2019 – December 31, 2034” Reminder to the Library Xxxx/Director: You and your staff are committed to the Terms and Conditions listed in the Memorandum of Understanding for collaborative management of the print format of archival science indexes and abstracts (“Boston Library Consortium Collaborative Archiving of Science Abstracts & Indexes” Agreement March 1, 2019 – December 31, 2034”) for the purpose of maximizing information resources while releasing shelf space for all participants. Appendix A (Journal titles to be maintained by the FCLRC/Five Colleges Libraries) American Chemical Society Journals (from first available year through 1999) Abstracts of ACS Conference Proceedings Accounts of Chemical Research (0001-4...
Assessment and review. EHL will undertake assessments and/or reviews, where deemed necessary, and in accordance with OIMS requirements. Assessments and reviews may include third party waste facilities, Resettlement Action Plans and contractors or suppliers. The IESC will conduct periodic monitoring reviews of the Project, largely based on the social and environmental mitigation measures set out in this ESMP. Such reviews will be undertaken in accordance with a predetermined protocol as agreed with EHL. EHL, contractors and subcontractors will cooperate with the IESC in the execution of monitoring reviews. Upon completion of reviews, the IESC will provide EHL and the Lender Group with a draft report. The draft report will be discussed between the IESC, EHL and the Lender Group, following which the IESC will provide EHL with a final report, which in turn will be disclosed on the Project website. EHL will xxxxxxx findings of the reviews.
Assessment and review. The Salesian Society shall periodically assess and review the performance of the School. To assist in the assessment and review conducted by the Salesian Society, the IMC shall regularly submit to the Salesian Society the school annual report, school self-evaluation report and external school review report. The IMC shall also provide information and statistics in relation to the current education environment of the School to the Salesian Society from time to time.
Assessment and review. SELLER shall implement a process for regularly testing, assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of the security measures it puts in place to ensure the security of the P&G INFORMATION.
Assessment and review. A review of the data sharing agreement will take place every two years, unless otherwise agreed by the parties’ Data Protection Officers. The aim of the review will be to ensure the purposes are still relevant, the scope has not slipped, the benefits to the data subjects and parties are being realised, and the procedures for information security are effective.
Assessment and review. A review of this information sharing agreement will take place after an initial six months and yearly thereafter, unless otherwise agreed by the organisations’ Data Protection Officers. The aim of the review will be to ensure the purposes are still relevant, the scope has not slipped, the benefits to the data subjects and organisations are being realised, and the procedures followed for information security are effective. Changes in legislation and developments in the areas of public sector data sharing will be considered as and when they arise, as will any changes to the signatory parties. The working group who drafted this agreement strongly recommends that a working group approach is used for any reviews, as this was a successful way to achieve pan-London and cross-specialism consensus to one sharing agreement.
