PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. The results should be presented on A4 size paper (ISO/R 216). Results presented as diagrams should have axes scaled with a measurement unit corresponding to a suitable multiple of the chosen unit (for example, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 millimetres). SI units shall be used, except for vehicle velocity, where km/h may be used, and for accelerations due to impact where g, with g = 9.81 m/s2, may be used. Figure 1 - Frequency response curve CFC FL FH FN N a b c d e f g Logarithmic scale ± 0.5 dB + 0.5; -1 dB + 0.5; -4 dB - 9 dB/octave - 24 dB/octave ∞ - 30 Hz Hz Hz 1,000 < 0.1 1,000 1,650 600 < 0.1 600 1,000 180 < 0.1 180 300 60 < 0.1 60 100 Annex 9 DEFINITION OF DEFORMABLE BARRIER
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. Except for the Contractor's proprietary and business sensitive data, the Contractor shall publicize the technology and the results of the demonstration program in scientific journals and conference proceedings, as well as trade shows, magazines, and on the world- wide web, as appropriate. The Contractor shall work with the State, NYSERDA, NYSDEC, and the operators/managers of each State or other facility involved in the system demonstration to publicize and provide access to the general public, to the extent possible.
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. The display of results can assist in navigating through them, so that they can be consolidated and sorted by relevance, title, size, author, publisher, year, description, etc. Figure 4: Three necessary elements of the Finding Aids Indexed metadata Search functionality Presentation of results Indexed metadata. The amount, type and pertinence of metadata that are indexed and searchable vary greatly between access services. When archives are asked about what kinds of metadata are visible and searchable in their Finding Aids, the picture is motley and no access method to metadata stands out (Q27): 10 out of 18 (56%) cited descriptive metadata/Dublin Core13. There are two mentions of technical metadata and one mention of administrative metadata. Other metadata standards quoted are DDI-‐L14, ISAD (G)15, EAD16 compliant metadata, ISAAR (CPF)17, FGDC CSDGM18 and DataCite19, and quoted metadata elements are archival reference number, title, time, provenance, geographical coverage, subject, connected persons, institutions, file type, size, dates of important actions, fond, inventory, archival unit, and creator. 65% (13 of 20) of the archives allow metadata search across all descriptions of Information Packages when browsing metadata for the purpose of identifying Information Packages of potential interest (Q28). Figure 5: Archives allowing metadata search across Information Packages Do you allow metadata search across Information Packages? No 35% Yes 65% Search functionality. Good and user friendly Finding Aids support multiple entries for search including a broad free-‐text search on all indexed fields à la “Google search” as well as the possibility for browsing different hierarchical structures, often spanning from fond-‐level to document-‐level. Sometimes the basic search function is complemented by an advanced and/or faceted search function allowing for searches 13 xxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/ 14 Data Documentation Initiative: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/Specification/ 15 General International Standard Archival Description: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/10207/standards/isadg-‐general-‐ international-‐standard-‐archival-‐description-‐second-‐edition.html 16 Encoded Archival Description: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/ead/ 17 International Standard Archival Authority Record For Corporate Bodies, Persons and Families: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/10203/standards/isaar-‐cpf-‐international-‐standard-‐archival-‐authority-‐record-‐for-‐corporate-‐bodies-‐ persons-‐and-‐families-‐2nd-...
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. In approximately half of the cases the results presented are limited to the IPs that have no access restrictions attached to them, because even though one does not get access to the content data via the Finding Aids, the display of metadata elements can compromise anonymisation. The presentation of results is quite trivial, and the fonds, series, documents or files are simply displayed accompanied by a number of relevant descriptive metadata elements that users can run through to identify data of potential interest.
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. The presentation of physics results at conferences and workshops will be discussed and decided by the Executive Board following the procedure outlined in section 1.5.5. The Chair of the Collaboration Board shall ensure that each group has a fair share of the presentations. MAGIC-specific invitations shall be made known to all members of the Collaboration Board. No new results can be presented outside the MAGIC collaboration without agreement by the Executive Board. In case of outstanding or conflicting results, the Chair of the Collaboration Board might decide to call for an extraordinary Collaboration Board meeting either de visu or virtual to decide on their release. If deemed necessary, the publications of new scientific results or new discoveries shall be supplemented by press releases, according to the guidelines set out in Annex 3. The Chair of the Collaboration Board will also take care that the MAGIC collaboration produces materials available for the interested public as part of an education and outreach program involving public talks, high-school visits, or media contact.
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. In order to further the process of engagement with the scientific community, the Contractor shall present the results of the investigations using one of the following venues: (1) a scientific conference organized by the PTS; (2) a workshop or technical meeting organized by the PTS or in coordination with the PTS; or (3) on the vDEC wiki webpage, in a space dedicated for this purpose and accessible by the vDEC users.
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. Grantees must agree to prepare an article for The Journal of Student Employment. In addition, they may be invited to present their findings at the NSEA annual conference. Grantees agree to comply, insofar as possible, with these and similar reasonable requests. PROPRIETORSHIP: Results of research conducted under NSEA SRGP will remain the property of the principal researcher; however, NSEA will retain royalty-free use of the research results and may publish and disseminate such results as deemed appropriate by the Association. Grant recipients are encouraged to submit the project for educational and/or professional purposes in the form of a graduate thesis or dissertation, professional paper, journal article or presentation. Any such presentation or publication of the results of the research will be required to cite NSEA funding of the project. Grant recipients agree to inform NSEA of any such submissions and to provide NSEA with a copy of any resulting publications. I agree to the terms of the NSEA SRGP as described above. Signature of Grantee Date If the principal researcher is different from the grantee, the principal researcher must complete the following certification. I agree to the terms to the NSEA SRGP as described above. Signature of Principal Researcher Date
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. The work necessary to prepare and present a report detailing the findings of the assessment and analysis. The work will include a maximum of two meetings with the county. This scope of work assumes one public meeting. The following will be necessary to complete the work:
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS. At the conclusion of the process, a summative (final) presentation will be made to all City staff, and can be made (at the discretion of the City’s Project Team and/or Director) at a scheduled Advisory Board or City Council meeting disseminating the results of all work completed. Resulting Deliverables Comprehensive, detailed information will be provided to the City based upon all project work as identified and confirmed in this proposal and in the Project Initiation Meeting. Professional’s Deliverables will include the following items. An illustrative report will be presented to the City which will include the following.
