Governance and Review Sample Clauses

Governance and Review. 4.1 Annual Partner Dialogue between the two Governments will ensure shared, regular, evidence-based review of progress against the objectives and commitments of the Agreement. The Dialogue will consider key policy and programming issues that require high-level resolution to improve performance of the aid program
Sample 1Sample 2
Governance and Review. 4.1 Annual Development Cooperation Dialogues between senior officials from the Partners’ governments, reporting to Ministers, will review progress of development cooperation activities and jointly determine new priorities.
Sample 1
Governance and Review. 9.1 Each Partner shall comply with the strategic governance and review processes for the overarching Partnership Arrangements set out at Schedule 5.
Sample 1
Governance and Review. 6.1 The coordinating authorities under this MoU are, for the Government of Australia, the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) and, for the Government of Afghanistan, the Ministry of Finance. AusAID will draw in other Australian agencies that administer ODA to MoU discussions as appropriate.
Sample 1
Governance and Review. Each Partner shall comply with the strategic governance and review processes for the overarching Partnership Arrangements set out at Schedule 5. The commissioning function shall be subject to the agreed management structure, personnel arrangements, processes, protocols and polices set out in Schedule 6, as relating to the relevant functions and clinical governance requirements of the Partners. It shall be the obligation of the PCT to ensure that the commissioning of the Services is supported and performed in such a way as to meet these requirements. The Partners shall co-operate with each other to enable each Partner to comply with its duties under Part 14 of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Xxx 0000 (the “2007 Act”). Such co-operation shall include, without limitation: responding to requests for information made by Local Involvement Networks and making such information available. In complying with Clause 9.3, the Partners shall comply with the requirements (including any limitations) imposed through any regulations, directions or guidance as may be issued by the Secretary of State from time to time pursuant to the 2007 Act. Termination Either Partner may at any time give Notice in writing to the other Partner terminating this Agreement as from the date of service of such Notice whenever the following events occur: the other Partner commits a material breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement which is not capable of remedy or, if capable of remedy, which has not been remedied within a reasonable time after receipt of written Notice from the Partner serving the termination Notice requiring it to remedy the breach; any change in law or legislation as a result of which it is unable to fulfil its obligations hereunder; if the other Partner purports to sub-contract, assign, transfer, charge, create a trust in or deal in any other manner with this Agreement or its rights under it or part of it in breach of Clause 16; its fulfilment would be ultra xxxxx for one or both Partners and the Partners are unable to agree a modification or variation to this Agreement so as to bring the specific matter within its powers; or either Partner is subject to a funding shortfall in relation to any contributions identified in Schedule 4 as being contingent on certain events such that, due to such events not occurring, it cannot make such contributions under this Agreement and the Partners are unable to agree a modification or variation to this Agr...
Sample 1
Governance and Review. The annual partnership talk coupled with the regular partnership dialogues as required between senior officials of the Partners will ensure there is a joint, regular and evidence-based review of progress against the objectives, Performance Benchmarks and mutually reinforcing commitments under this Arrangement. The Partners undertake to discuss any performance concerns and attempt to resolve issues through dialogue. The GOA’s performance against the objectives and priorities under this Arrangement will be reported and reviewed through the production of an Annual Program Performance Report. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Governance and Review

  • GOVERNANCE AND REPORTING Measure 3a Is the school complying with governance requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to governance by its board, including but not limited to: • Governing board composition and membership requirements pursuant to Ch. 302D, HRS • Governing board policies • Governing board reporting requirements • Procurement policies • State Ethics Code (Ch. 84, HRS), including conflict of interest policy Measure 3b Is the school holding management accountable? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to oversight of school management, including but not limited to: • (For Education Service Providers [ESPs]) maintaining authority over management, holding it accountable for performance as agreed under a written performance agreement and requiring annual financial reports of the ESP • (For Others) oversight of management that includes holding it accountable for performance expectations that may or may not be agreed to under a written performance agreement Measure 3c Is the school complying with data and reporting requirements? Meets Standard: The school materially complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations and provisions of the charter contract relating to relevant reporting requirements to the State Public Charter School Commission, State Department of Education as the State Education Agency (SEA) and sole Local Education Agency (LEA) and/or federal authorities, including but not limited to: • Compliance with minimum educational data reporting standards established by the BOE • Maintaining and reporting accurate enrollment and attendance data • Maintaining and reporting accurate personnel data • Annual reporting and immediate notice requirements • Additional information requested by the State Public Charter School Commission

  • Governance (a) The HSP represents, warrants and covenants that it has established, and will maintain for the period during which this Agreement is in effect, policies and procedures:

  • Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Consulting Teachers (CT) will be assigned to all new teachers with no prior teaching experience and tenured teachers rated ineffective on the qualitative measures at the end of the previous school year and recommended by the PAR Panel. Evaluations for Probationary and Ineffective Teachers:

  • Monitoring and Review 5.1 The Council and the BID Company shall set up the Standard Services Review Panel within 28 days from the date of this Agreement the purpose of which shall be to:

  • Corporate Governance Ultimus shall provide the following services to the Trust and its Funds:

  • Governance of School 2.1. The School's Governing Board is the independent board of the School that is responsible for the financial, organizational, and academic viability of the School; possesses the independent authority to determine the organization and management of the School, the curriculum, and the instructional methods; has the power to negotiate supplemental collective bargaining agreements with exclusive representatives of their employees and is considered the employer of School employees for purposes of chapters 76, 78 and 89; and ensures compliance with applicable laws.

  • Implementation and Review The Parties shall consult annually, or as otherwise agreed, to review the implementation of this Chapter and consider other matters of mutual interest affecting trade in services. (10) 10 Such consultations will be addressed under Article 170 (Free Trade Commission) of Chapter 14 (Administration of the Agreement).

  • Peer Assistance and Review Program 1. MCEA and MCPS agree to jointly operate a Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program. The PAR Program is a mechanism for maintaining systemwide quality control and ensuring that all MCPS teachers responsible for teaching students are functioning at or above the high MCPS standards of performance. It provides intensive assistance for any teacher who has not yet achieved that standard or who falls below acceptable standards. Assistance and review are provided to both experienced MCPS teachers in need of significant improvement and teachers in their first year of teaching.

  • Contract Governance Any contract made or entered into by the TIPS is subject to and is to be governed by Section 271.151 et seq, Tex Lo Code. Otherwise, TIPS does not waive its governmental immunities from suit or liability except to the extent expressly by other applicable laws in clear and unambiguous language. Yes, I Agree (Yes) 9

  • Project Governance (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.