Project Governance Clause Samples

Project Governance. Section 7.01 Establishment of Governance Committees 21 Section 7.02 Development Committee 21 Section 7.03 OAC Group 22 Section 7.04 Operations Committee 23 Section 7.05 Capex Committee 23 Section 7.06 Economic Development Committee 24 Section 7.07 Community Engagement Committee 24 Section 7.08 Annual Report from Developer 25

Project Governance. 9.1 Each Party shall nominate a project manager (“Project Manager”) who shall be responsible for day to day management of the Project and communication between the Parties. Each Party shall ensure that the Project Manager which it assigns is suitably qualified and experienced and shall use reasonable endeavours to maintain continuity of the Project Manager for the duration of the Project.

Project Governance. The organisational structure of the consortium shall comprise the following consortium bodies: The general assembly (“General Assembly”);

Project Governance. The Awardee will ensure that an efficient and effective project governing structure is in place throughout the award period to support all critical or significant project activities. 3.1. The approved charter/bylaws governing the operation of the statewide (jurisdiction) EPSCoR committee must be also submitted to the cognizant NSF Program Officer via email with the RII Strategic Plan (see 4.2 below). A complete list of members and their affiliation must be provided. NSF should be notified via email of any changes to charter/bylaws or committee membership. Care should be taken to have committee members from academe, government and private sectors, including members of underrepresented groups.

Project Governance. 3 1 If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient must: (a) provide reasonable notice to the Ministry of all Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings; and (b) copies of all documents and notices to be tabled at the Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings to the Ministry no later than a reasonable period prior to the meetings, and the minutes of those meetings within a reasonable period after each meeting

Project Governance. As a consortium of universities and the manager of the NSO, AURA has the responsibility to engage the solar physics and related sciences community, including universities and the broader scientific community, in its governance, planning and program implementation. Strong involvement of the external community is essential for effective NSO science and facility planning, especially on longer time scales. This engagement occurs in many ways, including but not limited to: briefings and breakout sessions at the Annual Members Meeting; external community membership on AURA governance councils; ad hoc conferences and workshops; on-line publications and surveys, and broad community surveys.

Project Governance. (a) If advised in writing by the Ministry the Recipient will: (i) provide reasonable notice to the Ministry of all Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings; and (ii) provide copies of all documents and notices to be tabled at the Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings to the Ministry no later than a reasonable period prior to the meetings, and the minutes of those meetings within a reasonable period after each meeting (b) The Ministry may appoint observers who will be entitled to attend and speak at all Project management group meetings and Project governance group meetings (but will not be entitled to vote on any matter at those meetings).

Project Governance. 8.1.1. The project is overseen by the Graduate Management Training Scheme, Attraction and Recruitment Team (a function within NHS England’s Workforce, Training and Education directorate). The successful supplier is expected to provide updates as required, including the prompt escalation of any risks and issues to the Business Contract Manager. 8.1.3. The Business Contract Manager (BCM) for this requirement is: 8.1.4. Please refer to section 4 of this document, for further detail on the deliverables.

Project Governance. Florida State University will, in coordination with the University of Florida and Los Alamos National Laboratory, assume overall responsibility for the planning, operation and scientific and technical management of the NHMFL…The overall mission of the NHMFL is to provide high magnetic field facilities, instrumentation and necessary services for research conducted by users from various disciplines, including, but not limited to; physics, chemistry, materials science, engineering, and the biological sciences. Access to the NHMFL is based on review of competitive proposals. Proposals shall be considered on the basis of scientific and technical merit and on broader implication of the work proposed as defined in the NSF Merit Review Criteria. B. Principal Investigator (PI): ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Boebinger is the PI and he serves as the Director of NHMFL. The Director, in consultation with NSF staff, shall appoint the NHMFL User Collaboration Grants Program (UCGP) Committee (3.F) and the User Facility Directors that run the NHMFL User Program (3.D). The Director is responsible for the proposal review process and the final decisions on scheduling of magnet time based on recommendations by the User Facility Directors.