Determine Role with Partners Sample Clauses

Determine Role with Partners. Has public health collaborated with legal, scientific and community partners to determine roles and responsibilities for the development and implementation of NPI recommendations? [Yes/No] Aligns To Function 1 Measure Applies To: Circumstances for Reporting: Data May Be Taken From: Other Considerations: ☑ States □ Annual Reporting □ Incident □ Optional ☑ Directly Funded Localities ☑ If PHEP Funds Allocated to the Capability or Contracts Plan * □ Exercise □ Accountability ☑ Territories or Freely Associated States (Puerto Rico only) □ If Emergency Response Required Use of this Capability, Regardless of Funding □ Planned Event □ Data Collected By * BP2 EXCEPTION: Baseline reporting required at Mid-year BP2, with opportunity to update at end-of-year.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Determine Role with Partners. (Awardee) The awardee health department has collaborated with legal, scientific and community partners to determine roles and responsibilities for the development and implementation of NPI recommendations [Yes/No] PHEP 11.2: Determine Role with Partners (Local Health Departments) Proportion of PHEP-funded local health departments (LHDs) that have collaborated with legal, scientific and community partners to determine roles and responsibilities for the development and implementation of NPI recommendations PHEP 11.3: Develop NPI Recommendations with Partners Proportion of key partners identified to have an incident-specific role that participated in the development or implementation of NPI during an incident PHEP Non-pharmaceutical Intervention (NPI) Performance Measure Case Study PHEP Example 1 – A centralized state with regional/district public health offices and one municipal health department in a large city Awardee X is a medium sized state with several state-run district/regional public health offices and a large, independent municipal health department. Public health services are provided by a mix of the central public health state office, district offices and the municipal health department (for residents of that city). Awardee X has a programmatic goal to build its NPI capability (Capability 11) during Budget Period 1 (BP1) and will allocate PHEP funds to help achieve this goal. Based on its governance structure and functional operations, pre-incident planning activity will occur at both the state and local (district) level. Awardee X will also contract with the large municipal health department to conduct NPI preparedness activities. The awardee will therefore report on both pre-incident planning measures for NPI, PHEP 11.1 and 11.2. Awardee X’s PHEP director reviews PHEP 11.1 and learns that to answer “YES” in meeting the PM, the health department must have addressed the following 11 elements (see “How is the measure calculated?” on page 84 of the PM guidance, version 1.1): • Legal: Identification of legal authorities for NPI implementation (hazard-specific) • Legal: Identification of legal barriers to NPI implementation • Legal: Identification of authorities able to alter legal statutes as needed • Scientific: Identification of SMEs needed to assess the severity of exposure and/or transmission • Scientific: Identification of triggers for needing an NPI • Scientific: Development of NPI recommendations prior to incidents • Scientific: Agreement to ...
Sample 1
Determine Role with Partners. Has public health collaborated with legal, scientific and community partners to determine roles and responsibilities for the development and implementation of NPI recommendations? [Yes/No] Measure Applies To: Circumstances for Reporting: Data May Be Taken From: Other Considerations: ☑ States □ Annual Reporting □ Incident □ Optional ☑ Directly Funded Localities ☑ If PHEP Funds Allocated to the Capability or Contracts Plan* □ Exercise □ Accountability ☑ Territories or Freely Associated States (Puerto Rico only) □ If Emergency Response Required Use of this Capability, Regardless of Funding □ Planned Event □ Data Collected By *BP2 EXCEPTION: Baseline reporting required at mid-year BP2, with opportunity to update at end-of-year. How is the measure calculated? This is a “yes/no” measure, which CDC calculates based on self-report by the awardee indicating whether the responsible entity or entities (new) have completed all of the following elements: Legal • Identification of legal authorities for NPI implementation (hazard-specific) • Identification of legal barriers to NPI implementation • Identification of authorities able to alter legal statutes as needed Scientific • Identification of SMEs needed to assess the severity of exposure and/or transmission • Identification of triggers for needing an NPI • Development of NPI recommendations prior to incidents • Agreement to participate in NPI recommendation development/adjustment at the time of an incident Community • Identification of key community organizations needed for NPI implementation (hazard- specific) • New - Up-to-date contact information for each identified key community organization • Development of written agreements or jointly developed operational plans • Identification of secondary factors (e.g., those based on intended and unintended consequences) that affect NPI implementation Why is this measure important? Development and implementation of non- pharmaceutical interventions is made more effective through the establishment of partnerships and a determination of roles and responsibilities among a range of legal, scientific and community partners. The immediate intent of this measure is to assess the extent to which health departments engage in pre- incident planning with partners to determine roles and responsibilities for the development and implementation of NPI recommendations. The broader programmatic aim of this measure is to increase the likelihood that NPI recommendations will be effectively i...
Sample 1

Related to Determine Role with Partners

  • LABOR/MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES Section 1. Labor/Management Committees The parties recognize that the holding of periodic meetings for the exchange of views and information contributes to the effectiveness of the labor/management relationship. Therefore, the parties shall establish Labor/Management Committees (LMC), in accordance with the provisions in this Article, for the purpose of addressing matters of concern in the areas of personnel policies, practices, conditions of employment, and other matters affecting employees. Each LMC will be co-chaired by one member from labor and one member from management.

  • Joint Union/Management Committee It shall be appropriate for either the Union or the University to request that a Joint Union/Management committee be convened, with Environmental Health and Safety as a participating member, to discuss health and safety concerns and to explore options for addressing those concerns through appropriate training or other approaches.

  • Joint Labor/Management Committees Purpose and Membership. Joint Labor/Management Committees are established to provide a forum for communications and problem-solving between the two parties and to deal with matters of a general personnel Union/Employer concern, as well as professional practices within the hospital related to patient care and professional issues. The Committees will work toward the improvement of patient care and recommend ways and means to improve patient care; and will address problems and concerns related to staffing and workloads. The Committees’ function will be limited to an advisory capacity and shall not include any decision making or collective bargaining authority. Committee memberships:

  • Project Team Cooperation Partnering 1.1.3 Constitutional Principles Applicable to State Public Works Projects.

  • LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 1. A Statewide Labor Management Committee consisting of not more than five (5) members selected by the VSEA from among bargaining units represented by VSEA and not more than five (5) members selected by the State shall meet periodically to discuss a mutually agreed agenda which may include methods of improving labor relations, productivity, safety, and health problems of a continuing nature, or other problems which have an impact on conditions of employment; provided, however, these sessions are not for the purpose of discussing pending grievances or for collective bargaining on any subject.

  • Labour Management Committee (a) Where the parties mutually agree that there are matters of mutual concern and interest that would be beneficial if discussed at a Labour-Management Committee Meeting during the term of this Agreement, the following shall apply.

  • JOINT LABOUR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 18.01 A Joint Labour Management Committee shall be established to attend to those matters which are of mutual interest. To ensure its effectiveness the Committee shall be separate and apart from the grievance procedure.

  • Union/Management Meetings ‌ The Union Committee and the Senior Union Official of the Union, or her/his representative, shall, as occasion warrants, meet with the Committee on Labour Relations for the purpose of discussing and negotiating a speedy settlement of any grievance or dispute arising between the Employer and the employee concerned, including possible re-negotiations relative to this Agreement and the Schedules which are a part hereof. However, except for renegotiations of Agreements, these matters shall be introduced to such meetings only after the established grievance procedure has been followed. Grievances of a general nature may be initiated by a member of the Union Committee in step two of the grievance procedure outlined in Article 9.04.

  • Union-Management Committee There shall be a union/management committee comprised of four (4) employee representatives appointed by the Union and four (4) employer representatives. The Committee's purpose is to provide and promote effective and meaningful communication of information and ideas and to make joint recommendations on matters of concern. Matters that are properly the subject of an individual grievance will not be discussed at this committee. The Committee will meet quarterly, unless agreed otherwise, at a time and place mutually agreed to provided there is business for their joint consideration. The parties will exchange agenda items at least one (1) week prior to the meeting. The parties further agree the Committee may meet at any time its members mutually agree a meeting should be held. The duties of the Chairperson will be shared by the parties. Copies of the minutes shall be provided to Committee members. The employer agrees to pay for time spent during regular working hours for representatives of the union attending such meetings. The parties may utilize video or teleconferencing services for the purposes of committee members attending committee meetings, where appropriate and available. Neither party can unreasonably deny an initiative to utilize video or teleconferencing services.

  • JOINT LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE In order to encourage open communication, promote harmonious labor relations, and resolve matters of mutual concern, the parties agree to create a joint labor- management committee. The committee will be governed by the following principles:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.