Desk Review Sample Clauses

Desk Review. HMO must complete and pass systems desk review prior to onsite systems testing conducted by HHSC.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Desk Review. The term “Desk Review” means the trained real estate analyst review of the BPO, CMA, Interior REO review, or third party origination appraisals. Each review may include a single product or span multiple products.
Desk Review. The desk review was a comprehensive analysis of the available literature (grey and published reports) on the process employed by the selected countries to develop and implement their action plans. The desk review included a review of VFCP country-level progress and final reports, country action plans, the USAID PAC strategy, the final report of the VFCP for PAC program, and other relevant documents and publications. The status of the PAC program, with a special focus on strengthened postabortion FP service delivery at baseline (prior to implementation of the action plans) and endline (March 2010), was studied to ascertain whether FP counseling and services were offered at the same time and location as treatment of abortion complications/emergency obstetric services. The comprehensive review guided development of the discussion guides and semi-structured interview tools for the qualitative assessment and facilitated the identification of stakeholders at the MOH, key staff directly and indirectly involved in the implementation of the action plans, heads and staff of facilities/OB/GYN units, and other relevant stakeholders, including country CA staff and VFCP facilitators/change management specialists.
Desk Review. The first step consists of collecting and reviewing relevant data and reports. This brief review aims to refine the context of the study, identify critical information gaps, and inform the update of the questionnaire. The consulting firm will review all documents pertaining to the trainings undertaken, the ILO- CEDEFOP-ETF manual on tracer study, past tracer study reports in Lebanon and provide a list of literature and references relevant to the report. The ILO will provide additional information to the successful bidder, including guidance the sample questionnaire and further information on the report structure and format.
Desk Review. A research on the supply and demand side of sustainable agricultural productsdomestic market. Collect all relevant studies, materials, and statistics already produced by relevant government agencies and other donors, NGOs and/or research institutes in the recent past, and detail the outcomes of these studies, as a starting point to map the value chain(at least two value chains per each municipality) and to reveal the main constraints and opportunities. A list of references and materials necessary for this assignment will be provided by RECC. Primary data collection Primary data collection in the field is undertaken by the expert to conduct the fieldwork to collect missing data, assess the specific situation and engage with potential stakeholders and key informants for the collection of their views. The fieldwork activities • Identification of the key chain (at least two value chains per each municipality) actors; • Interviews them where possible; • Interviews with the target companies (exporters/lead firms); assessing demand for value chain(at least two value chains per each municipality) outputs and what the constraints in their exporting business are; • Interviews with importers in order to have a clear understanding about (sustainable) demand; • Interviews with other chain(at least two value chains per each municipality) stakeholders such as input providers such as state agencies, financial institutions, universities, consulting and donor organizations; • Field survey to quantify/collect statistics on number of chain(at least two value chains per each municipality) actors, prices, current exports, employment, market trends, sustainability standards etc. • Technical consultation workshops with value chain(at least two value chains per each municipality) stakeholders to validate research findings. Data processing and reporting Field information and data will be analyzed by the expert in order to produce first draft reports for the at least two value chain(at least two value chains per each municipality) s per each municipality.
Desk Review. To inform the national family planning communication strategy, the following documents were reviewed by JSI:
Desk Review. ‌ A desk review of the original Appraisal for the remaining 90% of the Mortgage Loans in a PFI’s post-Closing QC random sample must be performed. It is acceptable for the desk review to be completed by an individual who is not a licensed or certified appraiser. However, the Appraisal reviewer must be competent in the application of basic appraisal theory for the following: • Assessing market risk; • Determining if a property meets eligibility requirements, including the LTV, TLTV and HTLTV ratios; • Determining that the value and marketability established as of the date of the original Appraisal are acceptable; • Assessing the quality of the original Appraisal; and • Prescribing corrective actions in the underwriting process when defects are identified. The use of an automated valuation model as a tool in the completion of the valuation assessment is also permitted. However, it is not to be used as a replacement for a desk review. The related documentation must be retained in the Mortgage Loan File or in the PFI’s QC records.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Desk Review. HHSC will conduct an expedited readiness desk review for the purposes of this contract. HMO must complete and pass systems desk review prior to onsite systems testing conducted by HMO.
Desk Review. The AE shall collect data to support rate setting activities for Waiver service(s) when requested and in accordance with instructions issued by the Department. The AE shall conduct a Desk Review of the Provider Cost Reports as per instructions issued by the Department.

Related to Desk Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Design Review Consumer shall provide Holy Cross an electrical one-line diagram and a relaying and metering one-line diagram prior to completion of detailed designs, unless the Consumer is installing a packaged system that is pre-certified to IEEE 1547.1 and UL 1741 standards. Packaged systems pre-certified under IEEE Standard 1547.1 and UL Standard 1741 will not require a relaying and metering one-line diagram. The submitted application and diagrams will be processed, reviewed, and acted upon in accordance with the Holy Cross Interconnection Policy.

  • Position Review ‌ The Employer may initiate a position review for a position it believes is improperly classified, and will inform the Union in writing when it has initiated a reallocation process for a bargaining unit position. An individual employee who believes that their position is improperly classified may request a review according to the following procedure:

  • Peer Review Dental Group, after consultation with the Joint ----------- Operations Committee, shall implement, regularly review, modify as necessary or appropriate and obtain the commitment of Providers to actively participate in peer review procedures for Providers. Dental Group shall assist Manager in the production of periodic reports describing the results of such procedures. Dental Group shall provide Manager with prompt notice of any information that raises a reasonable risk to the health and safety of Group Patients or Beneficiaries. In any event, after consultation with the Joint Operations Committee, Dental Group shall take such action as may be reasonably warranted under the facts and circumstances.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.