System Review Sample Clauses

System Review. The MPF Provider shall hold periodic meetings, at least once a quarter during 1999, to discuss possible changes and enhancements to the MPF Program system and to prioritize the scheduling of any such enhancements. Such meetings will be open to all FHLBs participating in the MPF Program, who can attend in person or telephonically.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
System Review. Fujitsu agrees to participate in regular quality system reviews for all Wafers. Spansion shall provide the details of such reviews to Fujitsu in writing at least one month in advance.
System Review. FSL shall participate in quality system reviews for Wafers as may be mutually agreed in writing by the Parties; provided that Spansion shall provide the details of such reviews to FSL in writing at least one month in advance.
System Review. M&I agrees to provide Customer a one-time credit of up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) to be applied against charges for a System Utilization Review to be performed by M&I" 54 7. The following Section 22(n) is hereby added to the Agreement:
System Review. FSL shall participate in quality system reviews for Assembly and Test Services as may be mutually agreed in writing by the Parties; provided that Spansion shall provide the details of such reviews to FSL in writing at least one month in advance.
System Review. To determine the adequacy of PRESSTEK's written quality assurance policies and operating procedures.
System Review. Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
System Review. The Staff will engage the services of a consultant to conduct a review of the Company’s engineering and operations practices and procedures as they pertain to system reliability and operational efficiency improvement, in the following areas: • engineering practices, procedures, and standards; • maintenance practices, procedures, and standards; • the load forecasting process used for system planning; • planning criteria; • inspection and corrective maintenance process and practices; • identification of potential alternatives for the deferral of the second Kingston transformer; • NESC conformance with regard to inspections and vegetation management (and safety issues if found in the course of the review), transformer ratings; and • tracking and reporting of reliability metrics. The study will be conducted as an informal dialogue exchange between the Company, the consultant and Staff. Minimal field work is expected and will only be necessary to verify that agreed upon practices, procedures, and standards are being adhered to. The consultant’s portion of the study shall be funded by Unitil in an amount not to exceed $50,000, unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties, and shall be recoverable by the Company through the REP. The Parties anticipate that the study will take approximately 6 weeks of effort to complete. Following completion of the study, the Staff will submit a report to the Commission. Unitil may submit comments or a response to the report, as it deems appropriate.
System Review. In order to comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and its implementing regulation at 34 C.F.R. Part 104, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq., and its implementing regulation at 28 C.F.R. Part 35, the College will take all steps necessary to ensure that students who are deaf or hard of hearing will receive the level and type of auxiliary aids and services necessary for them to receive equal access to the information-content of any course in which they enroll or program of the College in which they participate. This will include access that is timely and accurate. The College will not rely upon auxiliary aids that materially diminish the ability of its students who are deaf or hard of hearing to participate in class as the class is taking place.
System Review. After the completion of a two-year cycle of promotion reviews, the Association and Board shall create/charge a joint committee of six (6) members, three (3) selected by each party, to review the effectiveness of the system. The joint committee shall submit a report within six months of its charge regarding the effectiveness of the system and any recommendations for modifications. The final report shall be submitted to the Xxxxxxx and President of the NTT Faculty Association. The parties will then meet to discuss the promotion process and a potential Memorandum of Understanding.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.