Quality Assurance Review. The Contractor is required to make their case records available for quality assurance review at any time at the request of the ESS Unit. ESS TA’s are required to conduct Quality Assurance Reviews to evaluate contract compliance and identify training need(s) related to case documentation and/or contract requirements. DRS Counselor(s) may be included in the quality assurance review process.
Quality Assurance Review. Subrecipient shall be responsible for quality assurance review of their fiscal and program operations (including all special projects) which includes, but is not limited to, a quality assurance system to review case files, including CalJOBS electronic files, client’s WIOA eligibility determination and documentation, IEP’s, reports (issued by CalJOBS, State, and/or local agencies), gaps in service delivery, provision and documentation of substantial services, timely client exit, performance outcomes, follow-up activities, property management (including maintenance of up-to-date equipment inventory lists in each service location, purchases, expenditures and invoices, Federal and State requirements for universal programmatic, and physical access to services and activities (including access for individuals with disabilities). Quality and consistency of services among One-Stop Center locations, programs, and staff is essential. The WIOA Title I Career Services Service Provider shall be responsible for leading the quality assurance review on a quarterly basis. Subrecipient shall produce all quality assurance review documentation upon request by the County of Orange’s administrative office.
Quality Assurance Review. The Department and FHWA (as appropriate) will perform a QA review of the plans, specifications, and calculations to confirm that the Department's approved design criteria are being followed. Upon successful completion of the QA review, the plans will be issued to the Contractor by letter by the Department identifying the specific plans covered by the review. Plans issued will be stamped with the following statement: "Quality Assurance Review was conducted. Released for Construction." Upon successful completion of QA review of partial submissions, where permitted in the Special Provisions, plans will be issued to the Contractor by letter by the Department identifying the limitations of the review, and the limitations of the work released for construction. Plans issued will be stamped with the following statement: "Quality Assurance Review was conducted. Released for Construction."
Quality Assurance Review. Subrecipient shall be responsible for quality assurance review of their fiscal and program operations which includes, but is not limited to, a quality assurance system to review case files, including CalJOBS electronic files, participants WIOA eligibility determination and documentation, ISPs, reports (issued by CalJOBS, State, and/or Local agencies), gaps in service delivery, provision and documentation of substantial services, timely client exit, performance outcomes, follow-up activities, property management (including maintenance of up-to-date equipment inventory lists in each service location, purchases, expenditures and invoices, federal and state requirements for universal programmatic and physical access to services and activities (including access for individuals with disabilities). Subrecipient shall provide Internal Monitoring Procedures and Schedule to the County administrative offices by August 31, 2020. Subrecipient shall produce all quality assurance review documentation upon request by the County of Orange administrative office.
Quality Assurance Review. Subrecipient shall be responsible for quality assurance review of their fiscal and program operations (including all special projects) which includes, but is not limited to, a quality assurance system to review case files, including CalJOBS electronic files, client’s WIOA eligibility determination and documentation, IEP’s, reports (issued by CalJOBS, State, and/or lLocal agencies), gaps in service delivery, provision and documentation of substantial services, timely client exit, performance outcomes, follow-up activities, property management (including maintenance of up-to-date equipment inventory lists in each service location, purchases, expenditures and invoices, Ffederal and Sstate requirements for universal programmatic, and physical access to services and activities (including access for individuals with disabilities). Quality and consistency of services among One-Stop Center locations, programs, and staff is essential. The WIOA Title I Career Services Service Provider shall be responsible for leading the quality assurance review on a quarterly basis. Subrecipient shall produce all quality assurance review documentation upon request by the County of Orange’s administrative office.
Quality Assurance Review. 9.1 The Customer will endeavour to provide thirty (30) days written notice of a QA Review to the Service Provider, but may, at its absolute discretion, carry out a QA Review with at least ten (10) Business Days’ notice to the Service Provider. Prior to the commencement of the QA Review, the Customer will provide details of the methodologies to be followed to the Service Provider and will meet with the Service Provider to discuss the QA Review and such methodologies as reasonably required.
Quality Assurance Review. Licensor may at any time review all ------------------------ aspects of Licensee's operation of the eSylvan Internet Business ("Quality Assurance Review") to determine the extent to which Licensee's operations are or are not in compliance with the standards, methods and procedures Licensor establishes with respect to the Marks. At Licensee's request, Licensor will provide Licensee with the materials and forms used in the Quality Assurance Review process for Licensee's use in reviewing Licensee's operations.
Quality Assurance Review. Subrecipient shall be responsible for quality assurance review of their fiscal and program operations (including all special projects) which includes, but is not limited to, a quality assurance system to review of CalJOBS VOS Greeter System, reports (issued by CalJOBS, Federal, State, and/or local agencies) property management (including maintenance of up-to-date equipment inventory lists in each service location, purchases, expenditures and invoices, federal and state requirements for universal programmatic and physical access to services and activities (including access for individuals with disabilities). Quality and consistency of services among One-Stop Center locations, programs and staff is essential. The Subrecipient shall be responsible for leading the quality assurance review on a quarterly basis. Subrecipient shall produce all quality assurance review documentation upon request by the County Community Investment Division Director.
Quality Assurance Review. Provider may request that the SDOH conduct a Quality Assurance Review of the Provider's records, in order to ensure the accuracy of the information that it provides to the Board with respect to the provision of special services or programs that are paid by or through Medicaid. The Board shall assist the Provider in the making of such a request. If the SDOH so requests, the Board will provide the SDOH with assistance relevant to this subparagraph. The Provider shall fully comply and cooperate with any Quality Assurance Review that is conducted by the SDOH.
Quality Assurance Review. An internal quality assurance review of the bridge plans, specifications, and estimate will be conducted concurrently with review of the 65% design submittal by the City and other agencies. Because of this, the 65% design submittal is noted as “unchecked” and the 95% and Final design submittals as “checked”. The Consultant’s quality assurance program provides for independent checking of individual structural design tasks, as well as an independent review by experienced senior staff. The purpose of this review is to provide oversight to specific bridge design details by professionals who are not closely involved in the design, and to review the constructability, cost-effectiveness and completeness of design features relative to the normal standard of professional care
