Quality Assurance Review. The Contractor is required to make their case records available for quality assurance review at any time at the request of the ESS Unit. ESS TA’s are required to conduct Quality Assurance Reviews to evaluate contract compliance and identify training need(s) related to case documentation and/or contract requirements. DRS Counselor(s) may be included in the quality assurance review process.
Quality Assurance Review. Subrecipient shall be responsible for quality assurance review of their fiscal and program operations (including all special projects) which includes, but is not limited to, a quality assurance system to review case files, including CalJOBS electronic files, participant’s WIOA eligibility determination and documentation, IEP’s, reports (issued by CalJOBS, State, and/or local agencies), gaps in service delivery, service provision, documentation of substantial services, timely participant exit, performance outcomes, follow-up activities, property management (including maintenance of up-to-date equipment inventory lists in each service location), purchases, expenditures and invoices, Federal and State requirements for universal programmatic, and physical access to services and activities (including access for individuals with disabilities). Quality and consistency of services among OC Workforce Solutions Center locations, programs, and staff is essential. The WIOA Title I Career Services Service Provider shall be responsible for leading the quality assurance review on a quarterly basis. Subrecipient shall produce all quality assurance review documentation upon request by the County of Orange’s administrative office.
Quality Assurance Review. The Department and FHWA (as appropriate) will perform a QA review of the plans, specifications, and calculations to confirm that the Department's approved design criteria are being followed. Upon successful completion of the QA review, the plans will be issued to the Contractor by letter by the Department identifying the specific plans covered by the review. Plans issued will be stamped with the following statement: "Quality Assurance Review was conducted. Released for Construction." Upon successful completion of QA review of partial submissions, where permitted in the Special Provisions, plans will be issued to the Contractor by letter by the Department identifying the limitations of the review, and the limitations of the work released for construction. Plans issued will be stamped with the following statement: "Quality Assurance Review was conducted. Released for Construction."
Quality Assurance Review. Subrecipient shall be responsible for quality assurance review of their fiscal and program operations (including all special projects) which includes, but is not limited to, a quality assurance system to review of CalJOBS VOS Greeter System, reports (issued by CalJOBS, Federal, State, and/or local agencies) property management (including maintenance of up-to-date equipment inventory lists in each service location, purchases, expenditures and invoices, federal and state requirements for universal programmatic and physical access to services and activities (including access for individuals with disabilities). Quality and consistency of services among One-Stop Center locations, programs and staff is essential. The Subrecipient shall be responsible for leading the quality assurance review on a quarterly basis. Subrecipient shall produce all quality assurance review documentation upon request by the County Community Investment Division Director.
Quality Assurance Review. 1.03 Submit preliminary plans to the City
Quality Assurance Review. 9.1 The Customer will endeavour to provide thirty (30) days written notice of a QA Review to the Service Provider, but may, at its absolute discretion, carry out a QA Review with at least ten (10) Business Days’ notice to the Service Provider. Prior to the commencement of the QA Review, the Customer will provide details of the methodologies to be followed to the Service Provider and will meet with the Service Provider to discuss the QA Review and such methodologies as reasonably required.
Quality Assurance Review. An internal quality assurance review of the bridge plans, specifications, and estimate will be conducted concurrently with review of the 65% design submittal by the City and other agencies. Because of this, the 65% design submittal is noted as “unchecked” and the 95% and Final design submittals as “checked”. The Consultant’s quality assurance program provides for independent checking of individual structural design tasks, as well as an independent review by experienced senior staff. The purpose of this review is to provide oversight to specific bridge design details by professionals who are not closely involved in the design, and to review the constructability, cost-effectiveness and completeness of design features relative to the normal standard of professional care
Quality Assurance Review. As noted above, an internal quality assurance review of the bridge plans, specifications, and estimate will be conducted concurrently with review of the 65% Submittal by the City and other agencies. This quality assurance review includes independent checking of individual design calculations and details, as well as an independent review by experienced senior staff. The purpose of this review is to provide oversight to specific project details by professionals who are not closely involved in the design, and to review the constructability, cost-effectiveness and completeness of design features relative to the normal standard of professional care. This independent check will include a red, green and yellow check of the structural calculations and plans.
Quality Assurance Review. Consultant will conduct an internal quality assurance review of the plan line study concurrent with review of the draft plan line submittal by City and other stakeholders. Such review will provide for independent checking of individual tasks as well as an independent review by appropriately specialized and qualified senior staff, the purpose of which is to provide oversight to specific Project details by professionals who are not closely involved in the design, and to review the constructability, cost-effectiveness and completeness of design features relative to the applicable standard of professional care.
Quality Assurance Review. GG. Dynamic Message Sign Design is NOT part of this Basic Scope of Services. HH. Design and detailing for up to three non-ISR walls in included in the Basic Scope of Services. Subdivision monument relocation plans are NOT a part of the Basic Scope of services. If required subdivision monument relocation will be handled through the right of way acquisition process.
