Public Transit. NWIRP strives to be an environmentally conscious organization and promotes and encourages the use of public transit by staff whenever possible. Employees meeting the following criteria may opt into a public transit program whereby they pay up to fifty percent (50%) of their monthly public transit costs, with the Employer paying the remaining cost: Tacoma office employees (who opt out of the Employer provided-parking) and Seattle office employees. During the COVID-19 state of emergency NWIRP and the Union have agreed to suspend the transit program. Please see the Letter of Understanding.
Public Transit. No public transportation systems will be created or expanded as part of this subdivision
Public Transit a) Objective The public transit stream will primarily build new urban transit networks and service extensions that will transform the way that Canadians live, move and work.
Public Transit. Employees are eligible to be reimbursed for the cost of Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) All Access College Transit Passes or U-Pass College Student Pass during periods where they have an appointment under this Agreement. Reimbursement requests must be submitted in accordance with applicable policy which will allow for reimbursement for two (2) purchased passes at once. All eligible employees will be communicated directly to the relevant transit authorities.
Public Transit. The subdivision does not require improvements to ensure public transit service.
Public Transit. There are no MET Transit routes that service this subdivision at this time. No improvements with regard to MET Transit vehicles are anticipated at this time.
Public Transit. Manitoba municipalities spent a total of $23.7million on 32 public transit projects. Projects included: purchase of transit buses, handi-transit vehicles, installation of bus shelters and electronic signs, refurbishing a major bus terminal and transit building, installing fare collection boxes, and other transit capital assets (priority signals/queue jumpers). Projects under this category resulted in improved energy use, cleaner air and reduced GHG emissions. Municipalities also reported improvements in passenger service, passenger amenities and overall transit performance. Final Outcome – Reduced GHGs Total # of projects 32 Total GTF/PTF used* $23.7 million Total funds levered $142.8 million Total project Costs $166.5 million Outcomes identified by municipalities: 44 transit buses purchased 6 handi-transit vehicles purchased 1 stage of the Southwest Rapid Transit Corridor completed in the City of Winnipeg 592 new fare collection boxes installed 1 transit building refurbished 1 major transit terminal refurbished 3 projects to upgrade bus stops/shelters and electronic signs *Federal PTF Included in the $23.7 million spent is $10.8 million in federal PTF allocations provided as a one-time federal transfer in 2005 for municipal transit infrastructure. Funds were allocated to the four cities in Manitoba with transit systems at the time – Cities of Winnipeg, Brandon, Thompson and Flin Flon. These municipalities held most of the funds in reserve for future eligible projects. Between 2009 and 2012, the four municipalities spent all the funds held in reserve on the following projects: Winnipeg – purchase of 31 transit buses and upgrades to bus stops/shelters Brandon – purchase of 11 transit buses Xxxxxxxx – purchase of 2 transit buses Flin Flon – installation of a bus shelter and signage
Public Transit. The servicing of a property by public transit can have a significant effect on the value and desirability of a property for certain uses. For example, proximity to a light rail station is often an asset for various types of development. Consequently, Gafcon and its sub-consultant team will determine how the site is presently serviced by existing public transit and whether there are significant plans for changes in public transit that may affect the site. • Utilities. Gafcon and its sub-consultant team will check with the applicable utility providers to determine whether the property has adequate service levels available and determine the procedures for entering into provider agreements with the appropriate utility providers. If inadequate service exists or new service is required, Gafcon will determine availability, timing and costs of upgrading the existing utility service. Certain large-scale projects may be significantly impacted under CEQA if public utility upgrades are required. In some cases, upgrades related to energy substations can take up to seven (7) years to get through CEQA permitting by the public utility. • Wells. As part of its due diligence inspections, Gafcon will determine whether there are any xxxxx (water, oil, gas or monitoring) located on the property. Operating xxxxx may require permits and inoperative xxxxx may require sealing and/or regulatory closure. If water for a site is provided by an onsite well, quality/potability and quantity (i.e., gallons per hour) need to be determined. • Leases and Contracts. Gafcon will require the seller to promptly provide copies of all leases, licenses and contracts that affect the property. If there are leases on the property, Gafcon will also require the seller to provide estoppel certificates (e.g., no defaults, no prepaid rent, status of security deposits and the like) from each of the tenants prior to closing and have the seller provide a current rent roll for the property.
Public Transit. 1. The County shall be responsible for the administration, operation and management of the public transit system.
Public Transit. A.5.1 OBJECTIVE The objective of this category is to construct, restore or improve public transportation Infrastructure that will result in the reduction of environmental impacts, congestion, energy use or GHG emissions, and improved safety, supports tourism and commerce, promotes social and economic development of local areas, and helps Canada lead in the use of innovative technologies for the operation and management of local transportation systems, including passenger and traffic information systems.
