OVERALL ASSESSMENT. This lesson was successful in accomplishing: Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Lesson objectives Integration of Core Content standards Effective implementation of lesson plans The lesson was conducted in an effective manner The lesson met standards and expectations COMMENDATIONS:
OVERALL ASSESSMENT. Mandatory Section ============================================================================== NOTE: If the current assessment is for a new Central Office, attachment 1A must also be completed and considered prior to acceptance. ============================================================================== There are three potential assessment categories:
OVERALL ASSESSMENT. At the end of the Programme, final grading of the Student will be collated by UPO.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT. The case of GDF Suez is notable for several reasons. First of all, as for most of the EFAs so far negotiated (Xxxxxxx et al. 2013), the initiative to conclude the Health and Safety agreement came from the management. What is striking is that this case disconfirm the conclusions reached by those scholars assessing the behaviour of French multinationals towards EFAs. GDF Suez, deeply rooted in the French industrial relations system, choose to negotiate with the EWC and proved to be quite reluctant to engage in negotiations with the EMF and ETUFs in general. Indeed, for the Health and Safety agreement, it did not consider any ETUF as negotiating partner, instead it proposed to initiate the negotiation to the EWC SNB. However, the Special Negotiating Body (SNB), negotiating the agreements on behalf of the whole EWC, was not only unionized, but its members had also received a sort of mandate to negotiate EFAs by the respective national trade unions, after explicit request to do so by the management. Notwithstanding that, the SNB has failed both in leading the negotiation and conclude a homo- geneously accepted agreement. The finding is consistent with Waddington (2011)’s suggestion that it is not enough, for a EWC to be well functioning, to be fully unionized. For the EWC at stake two coordinators had been appointed, moreover, due to the complexity of the company, the role has been taken up by representatives of the two main ETUFs: EPSU and EMCEF. However, the quality of EPSU and EMCEF coordinators, in relation to the negotiation and conclusion of the Health and Safety agreement, has proved not be sufficient to strengthen the EWC during the negotiation process (see importance of quality of EWC coordinator in Wadding- ton 2011). Indeed, the two coordinators did not engage at all in supporting the SNB’s requests to the management, as the demands to continue the negotiation and edit the text of the agreement in order to find a satisfying compromise. To this it can be added that some of the respondents mentioned the lack of enough expertise of the EWC members and the consequent need to be supported by the respective national trade unions. This very likely reinforces the already existing tendency of national representatives to pursue national interests (Xxxxxxx et al. 2013) and does not allow the development of a transna- tional identity within the EWC (Waddington 2011). Furthermore, given that, the national trade unions have to put resources in the ETUF, through af...
OVERALL ASSESSMENT a. Executive summary • The project has achieved some of its objectives and milestones for the period (M1-M12); however, further explanations and some corrective actions will be required.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT. The stakeholders are generally satisfied with the Agreement. For the more general questions on the Agreement’s implementation, the majority of Cree and non-Cree stakeholders recognized the efforts made by all and stressed the parties’ goodwill. They defined this common will as a positive aspect making it possible to gradually build a relationship of trust and, ultimately, a viable partnership. Most are satisfied with the new opportunities for meeting and discussion created by the Agreement and see them as an opportunity to explain their viewpoint and understand that of the other party. The tallymen also appreciate their increased involvement in the forestry planning process. JWG members feel that they contribute positively to the Agreement’s implementation and TSFMA holders stress primarily the advantage of operating under a clear regime with clear mechanisms. The stakeholders’ general comments lead us to believe that the parties are committed, via the “Paix des braves”, to a collaborative learning process focussing on the search for “win-win” solutions. However, in response to more specific questions on the adapted forestry regime’s particular modalities, stakeholders voiced some dissatisfaction and hope for improvement. For example, some tallymen said they have observed no change yet in means of operating in the Territory. JWG members are unhappy about their lack of training in forestry techniques on one side and Cree culture on the other side. And, TSFMA holders complain about the very rigid normative context, which makes planning more complex and leaves little room for initiatives to harmonize silvicultural practices, and cite increased operating costs and decreased allowable cut since the Agreement was signed. These comments are not necessarily contradictory but rather the expression of stakeholders’ high expectations for the Agreement. It seems that while they do not question the Agreement’s validity, they hope to see its application improve on an ongoing basis. Criticism also pointed to the fact that stakeholders want to be part of the solution, which certainly augurs well. TSFMA holders nuanced this statement, pointing out that the parties did not really listen to them and that they had not been involved at all in designing the initial adapted forestry regime. In future, they consider it almost utopian to think that they will eventually contribute to the Agreement’s evolution but they continue to hope.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT. Those members having equal seniority will be promoted on the basis of an overall assessment. The overall assessment will be made by a selection board consisting of two (2) Kamloops Fire Rescue Managers and one (1) Platoon Captain, and the assessment will consist of:
OVERALL ASSESSMENT a. Executive summary Overall, the project implemented the corrective actions and recommendations from the mid- term assessment and achieved its main objectives and milestones for the period under review (M12-M18). During this reporting period, the project: ● produced a detailed roadmap of key tasks and modified appropriately the project plan for delivering and testing the proposed “learner-centered ecosystem of digital services and products” ● mapped the ecosystem architecture to user scenarios; described user personas and groups in detail (updated D18) and showed the potential impact of the CompLeap outcomes ● released an initial version of the Beta prototype in M18 as scheduled. It incorporated functionalities to record past studies (Module 1), gather present interests and competences (Module 2) and recommend future educational opportunities (Module 3). Despite that some of the underlying data are mocked-up the project showed that it can reach the stated technological objectives. ● carried out activities to disseminate and deploy the results of the project beyond the Finnish environment to stakeholders e.g. in Netherlands and Germany. ● described piloting activities in adequate detail including main activities to be carried out; participants sample and tools to collect and analyse feedback (WP3) ● planned and organised concrete actions and arrangements to conduct a case study exploiting the interlink between CompLeap and EUROPASS services (WP5). This activity suggested in the mid-term review offers a valuable opportunity for the project to effectively impact at European level. All changes requested to deliverables submitted in the first reporting period have been adequately addressed. In particular: ● Updated Deliverable D8 - Project Roadmap has been resubmitted as a self-sustained document (as well as a periodically updated live document), including the operative plan of activities for the next 12 months. Internal reallocation of the budget has been clearly detailed. KPIs are described. ● Updated Deliverable D14 - Risk Management Plan identifies well the possible risks and presents a credible contingency plan to mitigate delays. ● Updated Deliverable D15 - Desk research presents a practical analysis of the environment with a focus mainly on related to CompLeap initiatives and provides information related to the development of CompLeap requirements and architecture design, detailing user needs related to the current service ecosystem. ● Updated Deliverab...
OVERALL ASSESSMENT. The project is functioning properly. FOTIC will strictly comply with the provisions of the Trust Laws, the Measures for the Administration of Trust Companies, the Trust Documents of this Trust Plan and relevant laws and regulations, fulfill its duties, perform its obligation of being honest, trustworthy and cautious and managing effectively, manage and use the trust property, and seek maximum interests for the beneficiaries on the precondition of strict risk control. Trust Manager: China Foreign Economy and Trade Trust Co., Ltd. Date FOTIC China Foreign Economy and Trade Trust Co., Ltd. Structure Funds Trust Contract Annex 5 Operating Rules for Financial Accounting Article 1 Accounting Object The accounting object of this annex is this Trust.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT. Members having qualified will be promoted on the basis of seniority. A selection board consisting of two Fire Services Managers, Human Resources Staff and one member appointed by the Union will make the overall assessment, and the assessment will consist of:
