THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS Sample Clauses

THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. 7.1 The Chief Negotiators will be responsible for the conduct and coordination of the negotiations.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. SECTION 1
Sample 1Sample 2
THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. The Kingdom of Bahrain and the United States announced their intention to negotiate a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) on May 21st, 2003. H.H. the Crown Prince Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Hamad Al-Khalifa and Ambassador Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, United States Trade Representative, then discussed the preparatory steps for the launch of Free Trade Negotiations. On August 0xx, 0000, Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx formally notified the U.S. Congress of the Administration's intent to initiate FTA negotiations with Bahrain. The first round of FTA negotiations was launched on January 26th, 2004 in Manama, followed by a second round of negotiations in Washington, D.C. on March 1st – 5th. An interim round of technical discussions was held in London on April 19th – 22nd. On May 27th, 2004 the Minister of Finance & National Economy, H.E. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx, and Ambassador Xxxxxxxx announced in Washington D.C. the successful conclusion of the negotiations. The Government of Bahrain negotiation team was led by the Minister of Finance and National Economy, Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxx, and The U.S. team was led by Assistant United States Trade Representative for Europe and the Mediterranean, Xx. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. Specific chapters of the Free Trade Agreement were negotiated by individual negotiation committees, which are comprised of representatives of all the Ministries and Government Agencies concerned.
Sample 1
THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. It has three basic phases: The real negotiation process (face-to-face interactions) happens only in the middle phase. BEFORE NEGOTIATING: You could need other peoples' help and it could last a long time. It consists of: - Setting Objectives: It is the result you want to get at the end, which will lead you in the real negotiations. It is trivial to say, but negotiators tend to easily forget the objective when a problem appears. "Keep your eye on the ball." - Preparation: Some amount of information on the matter is necessary. Excessive information, despite what is sometimes taught, may impede good results. People who depend too much on getting information or on planning the event will reduce their flexibility. - "Psychological preparation". Basically it consists of assuming a status of EQUALITY and/or a Quadrant 1 mental position in the "I'm OK-You're OK" model. Until or without this mental status don't knock at the door of the negotiation room. Stay home or send somebody else.
Sample 1
THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. The national Eskom Transmission office is responsible for the negotiation process for all new Transmission lines. The negotiation process can be extensive, often running into years on the longer lines. It is, therefore, critical that the process is correctly programmed and incorporated into the planning of a new line. The negotiation process involves the following steps:
Sample 1
THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. During the negotiation process the focus is on the mutual purposes of the sponsored arrangement: supporting research, educating students and facilitating technology transfer while keeping in mind the relevant policy considerations and regulatory concerns. Negotiations will consider the various stakeholder groups involved in the process. The interest and needs of the Institute from the perspective of a non-profit, tax-exempt research and educational institution must be met, while also taking into consideration the commercial, for profit goals of corporate sponsors. Special needs, goals or requirements of governmental, nonprofit foundation or other institutional sponsors must also be considered, along with the history of the relationship between the parties. The negotiation relies on interpersonal relationships on both sides and frequent contact for status updates is essential to achieve timely results. Negotiations should be conducted so as to continually build upon the level of trust that has been developed between the PI and the sponsoring agency, company or other party. Among other things, this means courtesy in dealing with negotiating counterparts, prompt responses to inquiries and counterproposals, the presumption that the counterpart is negotiating in good faith, continual mindfulness of the counterpart’s objectives, and having as a goal a long-term relationship with the sponsor. RAF commences negotiations with representatives of sponsors which involve, as appropriate, the exchange of draft redlined agreements offering alternative contact language, and telephone and/or face-to-face negotiating conferences. RAF actively consults with the PI at all stages of the negotiation process. The negotiation process continues until an agreement which meets accepted parameters is made with sponsor or an impasse has been reached. The PI is advised and in the event of an impasse, the PI or any interested stakeholder may request that the agreement be referred to the Appeals Committee (see Section C below).
Sample 1
THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. 4.1 The Parties to this Framework Agreement shall ensure that appropriately mandated negotiators are appointed for every phase of the negotiations.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. The Sealord deal demonstrates the Crown’s commitment to direct negotiation as a means of resolving Treaty claims; but reveals also its failure to affirm the institutions which complement and safeguard that process. The Waitangi Tribunal played a key role in the Sealord deal, establishing the importance of the fisheries taonga, the history of its extensive use, and existence of the Treaty development right. Beyond Sealord, however, the Crown has made little commitment to the perpetuation of this role for the Waitangi Tribunal in future Treaty settlements. The Crown has made a larger budgetary allocation to the Treaty of Waitangi Policy Unit of the Department of Justice (“TOWPU’), which arranges negotiations, than that to the Tribunal.169 It is currently negotiating the Tainui claim without a prior Tribunal report.170 The Crown has also limited the jurisdiction of the Waitangi Tribunal: the Settlement Act prevents Maori from taking claims with respect to commercial fishing rights or the Sealord deal itself to the Tribunal;171 and the Treaty of Waitangi Amendment Act 1993 responded to political pressure to cut back the Tribunal’s recommendatory power over private land. The courts were also central to the Sealord deal: fishing rights were only negotiated because Maori were able to get judicial protection through section 88(2) of the Xxxxx “Politics and the Treaty”, paper presented to the New Zealand Law Conference, March 1993. 167 The National Government has declared its intention to resolve all historical Treaty claims by the year 2000. This commitment was first made in the National Party 1990 election manifesto: New Zealand National Party Facing the Future Together National Maori Affairs Policy, released 22 July 1990. It has been affirmed on a number of occasions since, including the Prime Minister’s speech on the introduction of the Settlement Act: New Zealand Parliamentary Debates Vol 532,1992: 12827. 168 Rt Hon Xx X XxXxxxxx, New Zealand Parliamentary Debates Vol 529,1992: 11220. 169 Chief Judge Xxxxx “Politics and the Treaty”, above n 166. 170 S Xxxxx “Seeking common ground” The Dominion, Wellington, 10 July 1992,7. 171 Section 6 Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975, as amended by s 40 Settlement Act.
Sample 1
THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS. 3.1 The Parties commit to engaging in an interest-based Negotiation Process that fosters an open exchange of ideas, the xxxxx discussion of interests and the joint analysis of issues. As a general principle, informal discussions are encouraged. Any statements made during the Negotiation Process, whether written or oral, will be without prejudice and will not be attributable to any Party.
Sample 1

Related to THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS

  • Negotiation Process (a) If either the Chief Executive Officer of ICANN (“CEO”) or the Chairperson of the Registry Stakeholder Group (“Chair”) desires to discuss any revision(s) to this Agreement, the CEO or Chair, as applicable, shall provide written notice to the other person, which shall set forth in reasonable detail the proposed revisions to this Agreement (a “Negotiation Notice”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the CEO nor the Chair may

  • NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE A. The parties agree to enter into collective negotiations over a successor Agreement in accordance with Chapter 123, Public Laws of 1974 in a good-faith effort to reach agreement on all matters concerning terms and conditions of employment. Such negotiations shall begin no later than the date set by the Public Relations Commission. Any agreement so negotiated shall apply to all Association members. It shall be reduced to writing, and subject to ratification by both parties, be signed by the Board and the Association, and be adopted by the Board.

  • Consultation Process (a) At the time of providing written notice of reduction to affected Employee(s), the Employer shall:

  • Arbitration Process Any arbitration will be conducted pursuant to the applicable rules (the “Arbitration Rules”) of the American Arbitration Association, as modified herein, to the extent such modifications are not prohibited by the Arbitration Rules. The arbitration will be conducted in Indianapolis, Indiana. The parties will select a single arbitrator, but in the event that the parties are unable to agree, the arbitrator will be appointed pursuant to the Arbitration Rules. The arbitrator will be a practicing attorney with significant expertise in litigating and/or presiding over cases involving the substantive legal areas involved in the dispute. The parties to the arbitration will not request, and the arbitrator will not order, that any discovery be taken or provided, including depositions, interrogatories or document requests, except to the extent the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000. The arbitration will be concluded within three months of the date the arbitrator is appointed. The arbitrator’s findings, reasoning, decision, and award will be stated in writing and based upon applicable law. Judgment on the arbitration award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. In the event that the arbitration results in an award which imposes an injunction or contains a monetary award in excess of $100,000, the award will be reviewable on appeal initiated by filing notice of appeal with the AAA office within 30 days of the award, governed by the AAA Optional Appellate Arbitration Rules and conducted by a panel of three new arbitrators, ruling by majority, under the procedure for appointment from the national roster of arbitrators. Unless the applicable Arbitration Rules require otherwise, arbitration fees and costs will be shared equally by the claimant(s) and respondent(s), respectively, in any arbitration proceeding. Should the AAA be unavailable, unable or unwilling to accept and administer the arbitration of any claim under these arbitration provisions as written, the parties will agree on a substitute arbitration organization, such as JAMS, that will enforce the arbitration provisions as written. Because this Agreement memorializes a transaction in interstate commerce, the Federal Arbitration Act governs the interpretation and enforcement of these arbitration provisions. More information about arbitration, including the Arbitration Rules, is available at xxx.xxx.xxx or by calling 0-000-000-0000.

  • Dispute Resolution Process Any claim, dispute or other matter in question not resolved by the process identified in Paragraph

  • NEGOTIATION PROCEDURES A. It is contemplated that matters included in this Agreement and other areas of common concern to the parties shall be subject to negotiation by mutual agreement between them from time to time during the period of this Agreement. The parties undertake to cooperate in arranging meetings, selecting representatives for such discussions, furnishing necessary information, and otherwise constructively considering the resolving of any such matters.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.