General Comments. Conference notes and/or agreements: Eligible for PGO next school year: Yes No Employee’s Signature Date Evaluator’s Signature Date Signature acknowledges participation in, but not necessarily concurrence with, appraisal conference. Additional comments and/or recommendations made by the evaluator may be attached. A statement may also be attached by the employee. Reviewer’s Signature Date Exhibit E-5 RSD Evaluation Report – Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Report Speech-Language Pathologist Name Evaluator Date Type of Evaluation Comments must be made in each category. If an employee does not meet standard, justification will be included in the comment section.
General Comments. The 3,847 Sq ft building is a single storey steel framed structure clad with insulated steel panels, it has a curved roof of insulated steel panels falling to hidden gutters and 3 strips of glass fibre panels for natural lighting within the main hall. Externally it is in excellent decorative order being painted xxxx and blue with a wooden facia running around the entrance door. The building was built in 2008 and has been unoccupied since, all the finishes within the building are like new. There are 3 vented store cupboards to the end of the building of brick construction with pitched felt roofs falling to gutters and a close boarded I shaped wooden enclosure for the bins at the rear of the building. *** *** Portions of this page have been omitted pursuant to a request for Confidential Treatment and filed separately with the Commission. *** Element Description Condition Office 1 Ceiling Suspended ceiling with lay in fissured tiles New Walls Painted Plaster New Floor Carpet New Doors Ash wooden door with vision panel, Door closer, handle and Yale type lock New
General Comments. 1. It is the intent that the Subcontractor shall be responsible for any damage on the Project caused by the Subcontractor and its Subcontractors and Suppliers. If the Subcontractor, upon receipt of notice from the Contractor, fails or refuses to repair or replace any work damaged by the Subcontractor, the Contractor is authorized to make such repair or replacement from any amounts due or to become due to the Subcontractor under this Subcontract.
General Comments. This asbestos survey was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the same locale. The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this report are based on conditions observed during our survey of the building. The information contained in this report is relevant to the date on which this survey was performed, and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at a later date. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for use by the City of Southlake for specific application to their project as discussed. This report is not a bidding document. Contractors or consultants reviewing this report must draw their own conclusions regarding further investigation or remediation deemed necessary. Terracon does not warrant the work of regulatory agencies, laboratories or other third parties supplying information which may have been used in the preparation of this report. No warranty, express or implied is made. Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 5 APPENDIX A CONFIRMED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS West Residential Structure 000 Xxxx Xxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Terracon Project Xx. 00000000 Xxxxxx Xx. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (Xxxx) Friable/ Nonfriable Assessed Condition1 Estimated Quantity2 Residential Structure and Garage/Apartment Structure 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Ceiling Texture (White, Semi-Smooth)/ Drywall/Joint Compound Throughout Structure Nonfriable G 3,330 sq. ft. 9, 10, 11 Ceiling/ Texture (White, Splatter Drag)/ Drywall/Joint Compound Kitchen Nonfriable G 265 sq. ft. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Wall Texture (White, Semi- Smooth)/Drywall/Joint compound Throughout Structure Nonfriable G 5,970 sq. ft. 19, 20, 21 Wall Texture (White, Splatter Drag)/Drywall/Joint Compound Kitchen Nonfriable G 530 sq. ft. 25, 26, 27 Resilient Sheet Flooring (Xxxxx, Hexagon Pattern) North Sun Room Nonfriable G 375 sq. ft. 43, 44, 45 Exterior Door Caulk (Black) Entry Doors Nonfriable G 40 ln. ft. (2 sq. ft.) 46, 47, 48 Exterior Window Caulk (White) Windows Throughout Structure Nonfriable G 100 ln. ft. (4 sq. ft.) 1Denotes condition – Legend: G-Good, D-Damaged, SD-Significantly Damaged 2ln. ft. = linear feet sq. ft. = square feet APPENDIX B ASBESTOS SURVEY SAMPLE SUMMARY West Residential Structure 000 Xxxx Xxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Terracon Project No. 95147249 Material Asbestos Containing Sample Numbers 12’ x 12” Ceiling Tile (White, F...
General Comments. Please provide side and rear elevations for both the townhomes and the small lot single-family detached dwellings (patio homes). The applicant contends that side and rear elevations are not required submittal items under the Planned Residential District and that they are unaware of other applicants being required to provide side and rear elevations. While sub-section 81.17. 07 5. b) does not expressly require elevations, sub-section 81.17.07 5. b) 3) requires “architectural design criteria for all structures.” We have routinely 10 interpreted this sub-section to require the submittal of front, side, and rear elevations with rezoning applications.
General Comments. The acceptance test shall be performed on equipment ready to operate. Operating instructions shall be made availa- ble. The acceptance test shall assess:
General Comments. This mission report was prepared as a part of the Twinning Project “Support to the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (ICBS) in Enhancing the Quality of Official Statistics”. This was the fourth mission of Component D: Methodological and Geo-spatial Tools for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Field Surveys. The main activities of the mission were: discussion on parameters and dilemmas concerning the creation of enumeration areas (EA), presentation of the first pilot for EA's division and discussion about first findings using the proposed EA's for managing and monitoring field surveys including the use of geo-spatial tools for the progress and non-response assessment at different levels of spatial resolution, overview by MS experts and ICBS staff on various field surveys, managing and monitoring technics and tools used during the data collection phase supported by geo-spatial applications, discussion following the MS expert's presentation titled “Rules of the Territorial Division” about how mapping and a new strategiof territory division can help field operations, consideration of the new approach to EA division proposed by MS experts and recommendations for the development of the new country division based on the small statistical units network, Discussion on necessary conditions for preparing a draft paper on methodology to manage and monitor progress and non-responses using various tools and methods including geo-spatial applications. Formulating conclusions and recommendations The mission assisted the ICBS and the MS experts in getting an overview of use cases and requirement specifications for combining GIS and other IT tools with methodology for monitoring & management of multi surveys interviewer network. The experts would like to express their thanks to all officials and individuals met for their kind support and for the valuable information they provided, which highly facilitated the experts' work. The views and observations stated in this report are those of the consultants and do not necessarily represent the views of EU, ICBS, CSO Poland or Statistics Denmark.
General Comments. For the purpose of calculating the update of UNIT PRICES, the first 3 (three) decimal places will be considered, addressing the dispositions contained in ATTACHMENT 1 to this CONTRACT.
General Comments. Terracon has developed this document in general compliance with the scope and limitations of the Agreement for Services between Terracon and the City of Xxxxxx Lake dated December 30, 2008. The development of this document drew on elements of the USEPA Community Involvement Toolkit, EPA 540-K-05-002, April 2005. This document is prepared for the exclusive use of our client for the specific application to the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted environmental engineering practices. No warranties, express or implied, are intended or made. APPENDIX A Comprehensive Development Plan for Xxxxxx Lake, Iowa APPENDIX B City of Xxxxxx Lake, Iowa Community-Wide Petroleum Brownfields Project Work Plan City of Xxxxxx Lake, Iowa Community-Wide Petroleum Brownfields Project Work plan for CERCLA Section 104(k) US EPA Xxxxxxxxxx Petroleum Assessment Cooperative Agreement No. BF98796501 Revised July 30, 2008 May 3, 2008 thru May 2, 2011
General Comments. You, the undersigned Client, herein referred to as ‘Client’, have requested that NW Chicago Home Inspections (NWCHI), hereinafter referred to as “Inspector” or “NWCHI”, conduct an inspection of the Property consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The inspection service is being provided at the request of you, our client, and is intended for your exclusive use and benefit. Not all conditions are apparent at the time of inspection, so it is recommended, and you agree herein, to consult with the Seller of the property regarding any significant deficiencies/malfunctions known to exist to the Seller. Please read the final inspection report carefully, as additional details concerning the nature of the inspection are found in the report.
