Management of Intellectual Property. Article II.32
Management of Intellectual Property. (1) By signing this Agreement the Parties hereby determine that in the moment of conclusion of this Agreement the EUCF coordinator has informed the Third party about measures for implementation of the principles set out in Points 1 and 2 of the Code of Practice annexed to Commission Recommendation on the management of intellectual property in knowledge transfer activities.
Management of Intellectual Property. The Lead Center shall manage intellectual assets in connection with this CRP (which, for purposes of this PIA, shall include associated intellectual property rights) in accordance with the CGIAR Principles on the Management of Intellectual Assets approved as part of the Common Operational Framework and any other Intellectual Property Principles adopted by the Consortium under the Constitution.
Management of Intellectual Property. Intellectual property of the band shall be managed as follows: __Copyright including all reproduction and recording rights to all musical compositions including music and lyrics as well as sound recordings and related video recordings created by any band member or band members during the life of this partnership shall be owned by the partnership, and copyright registrations shall be in the name of the partnership. Songwriting credit shall be to this Partnership. OR ____Copyright including all reproduction and recording rights to all musical compositions including music and lyrics as well as sound recordings and related video recordings created by any band member or band members during the life of this partnership shall be owned by the individual band members who contributed to the composition of such music and writing of such lyrics; copyright registrations shall be in the name of that individual band member or band members, and such rights shall continue in accordance with US Copyright Law irrespective of whether this partnership dissolves. Songwriting credit shall be to the respective band member or member(s). OR __Ownership of each original song developed by any band member or members for performance or recording by this partnership shall be agreed upon by unanimous vote of all band members prior to the performance or recording of any such song. OR [SET OUT YOUR OWN AGREED-UPON METHOD FOR DETERMINATING WHO OWNS MUSIC WRITTEN BY THE BAND OR ITS MEMBERS, AND HOW SONGWRITING CREDITS AND COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION WILL BE DECIDED.]
Management of Intellectual Property. All partners in the consortium are committed to making the knowledge generated during the course of the project as widely and as freely available as possible. Our intention is that all results will be of a form that should be made freely available for subsequent research and development, subject to the consortium agreement on IPR. Thus we aim to fully implement the public domain recommendation as per the Call Background notes3. For this reason all of our research papers, technical reports and software will be placed in the public domain. Where appropriate, we will license the products of our research with open-source licenses such as the GPL or LGPL licences. This supports our aim of facilitating access to the results of our research for the largest possible base of users (particularly developers of intelligent robots), whilst retaining appropriate control of IPR. We shall attempt to avoid reliance on proprietary software, and where such reliance is essential and it is possible we will design our systems so as to allow subsequent reimplementation using non-proprietary infrastructure. 3 xxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx/pub/ist/docs/cognition/fp7-challenge2-background_en.pdf References [1] X. Xxxxxxxxx. Lexically Specified Derivational Control in Combinatory Categorial Grammar. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2002. [2] X. Xxxxxxxxx and G.-X. X. Kruijff. Multi-modal combinatory categorial grammmar. In Pro- ceedings of EACL’03, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, 0000. [3] X. Xxxxxxxx. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22:577–609, 1999. [4] X. Xxxxxxxx. Goal processing in autonomous agents. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, The University of Xxxxxxxxxx, 0000. xxxx://xxx.xx.xxxx.xx.xx/research/projects/cogaff/81- 95.html#38. [5] X. Xxxxx. How Children Learn The Meaning of Words. The MIT Press, 2002. [6] X. X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxxxx, X. X. Xxxxxx, and X. X. Xxxxx. Experiences with an architecture for intelligent reactive agents. In Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 1995. [7] X. Xxxxxxx and X. Xxxxx. Continual planning and acting in dynamic multiagent environments. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Practical Cognitive Agents and Robots, Perth, Xxxxxxxxx, 0000. [8] X. Xxxxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxxxxx. Reinforcement learning of dialogue strategies with hierarchical abstract machines. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACL Spoken Language Technology 2006, 2006. [9] X. Xxxx and X. Xxxxxx. Computational inter...
Management of Intellectual Property. Article II.28
Management of Intellectual Property. Plans for management of knowledge and intellectual property within the project will be governed by the Project Coordinator and the Steering Committee that will establish the IPR strategies of the project. Before signing the contract with the European Community, in the Consortium Agreement Background (pre- existing know-how (information held by the participants prior to the conclusion of the contract with the Commission and information acquired in parallel with it, but not through the research activity) and pre- existing knowledge (owner, protection, use and dissemination)) arising from the research activities under this project as well as its access rights will be defined between the participants. In general access rights to Background only have to be granted to participants in the same project and only if participants need such know-how to carry out their own research work under the project. A participant may exclude specific Background from his obligation to grant access rights to other participants by written agreement. Access rights to knowledge owned by universities or public research bodies will need to be requested and negotiated by commercial participants and only before the conclusion of the contract with the Commission (or before a new participant joins the consortium). Knowledge of all results will be shared by all partners, and intellectual property of the results will be of all the investigators who have participated in achieving such results. The rules for exploitation of the results, including any patent generated by the project will be regulated by a Consortium Agreement to be signed among the partners. This will establish project specific individual rules for the dissemination and exploitation of project results, with particular reference, as explained above, to access rights related to pre-existing knowledge (“Background”) of the partners and to exploitation of results generated by the project itself (“Foreground”). Publication of project results will be regulated, so that it might not negatively affect the protection of such results. Policies regarding the transfer of knowledge will be also regulated, as will be the access to data and knowledge generated by other projects in which the partners are involved and that is necessary or useful for the project implementation. The Consortium Agreement will be updated during the life of the project if needed. The Consortium Agreement is based on the new IPR regime, a regulation of the European ...
Management of Intellectual Property. In a consortium agreement the partners will define specifically the rules and procedures for non- disclosure of the restricted know-how and dissemination of the other project results. The consortium agreement will be based on models provided from ICT and DESCA. Commercial utilization of the project results or the parts of the project results will be defined in a consortium contract. One of the basic premises of the project is that many of the project results (IP cores, CAD tools, etc.) will be publicly available on the project web-site and as open cores. However, every partner in the consortium will be able to select the level of availability of its own project results (as provided in table
Management of Intellectual Property. 3.1 For University Sole inventions, University will file, prosecute and maintain patent applications/patents at its own discretion and cost, subject to the terms of any license agreement between the Parties.
Management of Intellectual Property. (a) RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOINT PATENT RIGHTS. The party responsible for the filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights shall be determined by the Steering Committee on a case-by-case basis. Expenses relating to the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Joint Patent Rights shall be divided evenly by the parties, unless a different allocation is decided by the Steering Committee.
