Closure Plan. If the school does not meet the terms of the School Improvement Plan and attain a Satisfactory Rating by the end of the contract term, the school is a candidate for nonrenewal. If the school’s contract is not renewed, the school must implement the Closure Plan as described in the school’s charter contract. Three essential questions guide our VOA-MN authorizer oversight and charter school accountability plan. • ACADEMIMC PROGRA PERFORMANCE - Is the school’s Learning Program a Success? Academic Performance- All public schools, including charters, must fully participate in the state assessments - Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments. Data from state assessments as well as Title 1 Designation consistent with the state North Star system will be compiled and evaluated in the Annual VOA-MN Authorized Charter Schools Academic Performance Report by the authorizer. Charter schools are required to meet the academic performance standards for which they agree to be held accountable in their charter contract. The extent to which a school is meeting their World’s Best Workforce requirements and additional statutory purposes are also measured in the Learning program section. The VOA-MN Charter School Authorizing Program publishes annually an Academic Performance Report on their network of authorized charter schools. The report serves as a single annual source of academic program and performance information for all of our VOA- MN operational charter schools. The report contains an analysis of annual and cumulative academic program, performance, and professional development data for each school. Content from the annual Academic Performance Report also serves as the basis for the school academic performance analysis contained in the statutorily required Contract Renewal Evaluation Reports, including evaluation of the extent to which the school has met their primary purpose, “to improve all pupil learning and all student achievement” during the contract term. The VOA-MN determined academic performance standards contained below are uniform for all VOA- MN charter schools. The standards are contained in VOA-MN Charter Contract Addendum B (School Accountability and Authorizer Oversight System) and serve as the basis for both annual authorizer monitoring of school academic performance and contract renewal determinations. The authorizer reserves the right to have flexibility to reasonably amend these standards /expectations as needed (example: based on cell size being to small). On...
Closure Plan. If Community plans to terminate the residency of seven (7) or more residents under Section 1 above, Community shall submit a proposed closure plan in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 1569.682(b) to DSS for approval. Community will not accept new residents or enter into new Residency Agreements after it submits the closure plan to DSS. Until such time that DSS approves the closure plan, Community shall not issue a notice of termination to any resident under Section 2 above or require any resident to transfer. Upon approval by DSS, Community shall send a copy of the closure plan to the local ombudsperson program and commence issuing termination notices under Section 2 above.
Closure Plan. The Closure Plan shall consist of (i) issue identification and mitigation plan, including (A) waste rock, tailings, pit lake and local water supply issues; and (ii) a closure cost estimate.
Closure Plan. Summit Place School’s board will review its compliance with and progress toward state-defined minimum standards and board-determined targets in the school’s charter. The school’s executive director is responsible to review all metrics. The director will also propose an action plan to address any targets that the school has not met or has regressed in performance. SPS’s charter school board will notify its authorizer of its action plans if progress under those plans are not adequate after each year of its implementation. In the event of closure, whether by the revocation of the school’s charter or a planned cessation of operations, SPS will ensure that adequate human, financial, and planning resources are in place for a smooth transition and legal compliance with Utah Code 53A-1a-510.5 and in a way that protects students, employees, debt holders, and taxpayers. Once the closure process is initiated, the school’s interests will shift from providing education and protecting the school’s interests to protecting the state’s and chartering entity’s interests, as well as the obvious interests of students and families. SPS will work with the State Charter School Board on identifying a potential new or expanding applicant who can assume ownership of school assets and liabilities, including the school’s facility and existing lease or bond payments, sell school equipment or assets at market value, with proceeds either paying down existing debt, compensating for additional school closure services, or going back to the state as outlined in statute. All asset disposal or sales will be consistent with existing agreements and obligations. SPS will ensure that building security is maintained throughout the closure process to protect assets and the facility, transfer all other assets to the state, the owner under law of all school assets in the event of closure, work with state charter school board on identifying a new or expanding charter school that can benefit from existing facility, equipment, and agreements, pay down any liabilities first with proceeds from any asset sale or cash on hand. SPS will also initiate bankruptcy proceedings, if appropriate, inform bondholders and State Treasurer’s office, if applicable, of closure as required in bond covenants or in state law, assist current employees with job placement services, ensure that benefits programs continue consistent with COBRA, assist employees with transfer of retirement assets into personal accounts or rollover...
Closure Plan. If the school does not meet the terms of the Improvement Plan and attain a Satisfactory Rating by the end of the contract term, the school is a candidate for nonrenewal. If the school's contract is not renewed, the school must implement the Closure Plan as described in the school's contract with NEO.
Closure Plan. 4.1 Mined Out Land Total quantity of overburden and waste to be removed from the pits during the plan period will be 6.14 lac m3. This quantity of overburden will be backfilled in pit no. 4 on south side of road and between pillar boundary of A-39 & A-40 during the plan period. Area occupied by backfilling would be 9.023 ha with 10.0 m depth of backfilling. Swelling factor has been considered as 1.3. Volume to be accommodated will be 7.99 lac m3. Quantity of overburden to be removed from the 6th year to the life of the mine will be 13.17 million m3, which will be backfilled over and area of 80.577 ha upto 17.0 m height. Backfilling has already started in pit no. 5. This has already been backfilled in an area of 5.34 ha. Total backfilled area up to the plan period will be 9.024 + 5.34 = 14.363 ha. Land use pattern of mining lease area at various stages:- Sr. No. Particular Present Land Use (Ha) Use After Plan period year (Ha) Use by the end of Life of mine (Ha) Use at Conceptual stage 1. Pit 114.05 116.45 249.78 Rehabilitated & reclaimed by back filling (94.94 Ha) Plantation & water reservoir (154.84. Ha.)
Closure Plan the Vendor has not, and to the Vendor's knowledge is not required to have, (i) filed a "closure plan" (as such term is defined in the Mining Act (Ontario)) in respect of the reclamation or rehabilitation of the Lease, or (ii) filed any financial assurance to the Crown in right of Ontario for the performance of any closure plan or rehabilitation requirements related to the Lease.
Closure Plan. Seller has prepared and Buyer has approved the Regulatory Closure Plan that is attached as Exhibit D to this Agreement. Buyer and Seller jointly have prepared the document entitled IDT Building Condition/Statement of General Understanding that is attached as Exhibit E to this Agreement. Buyer and Seller also have jointly marked copies of the Building's Architectural and MEP Plans to further identify changes to the Building that are part of the Decommissioning, and these marked plans consisting of six separate sheets executed on behalf of Buyer and Seller on December 4, 1998 are attached as Exhibit F to this Agreement. The items attached to this Agreement as Exhibit D, Exhibit E and Exhibit F are collectively referred to herein as the "Closure Plan." The Closure Plan encompasses activities required by certain Environmental Laws applicable to the decommissioning of a semiconductor chip wafer fabrication facility (the "Mandated Activities"), which will be subject to approval by governmental agencies and authorities that are responsible for assuring compliance with such Environmental Laws (the "Responsible Agencies"). Additionally, the Closure Plan encompasses activities beyond the Mandated Activities which have been agreed upon by Seller and Buyer (the "Additional Activities"). From and after the Effective Date, no changes may be made to the Closure Plan except for: (i) modifications to the Mandated Activities which are required by the Responsible Agencies and are either (A) immaterial, in that such changes pose no detriment to Buyer, or (B) have the effect of enlarging, rather than diminishing, Seller's scope of work in connection with the Decommissioning; and (ii) modifications to the Additional Activities which are approved by Buyer in the exercise of Buyer's commercially reasonable judgment. Buyer shall deliver to Seller written notice approving or disapproving of any modification to the Closure Plan
Closure Plan this must describe the anticipated activities to be carried out to meet the Mine Closure Obligations.
Closure Plan. On July 9, 2020, Respondent submitted a Draft Closure Plan to EPA. EPA approved the Draft Closure Plan on August 27, 2020.
