Risk appetite Sample Clauses

Risk appetite. Risk appetite is the level of risk that may be contained in the Project to maximize value. The risk appetite is determined by the policy setters in the Project and defines the limits of exposure to risk that they are willing to undertake. The risk appetite reflects the operation and execution strategy of the Project, its goals, the business plans and the expectations of interested parties, the willingness and ability to take risks and it may change with time. Field Sample Declarations on risk appetite Finances / investments / budget * Maintaining a cash flow that allows ongoing operations * Maintaining compliance with budget goals / budget supervision on large projects * Maintaining a minimal investments budget Regulation * Rate of internal regulation violations (internal procedures) * Zero tolerance for violations in the field of local and international compliance Security * Number of security events - harm to employees / clients, no more than X incidents per year * Zero tolerance to security faults that affect air traffic * Zero tolerance to loss of life or severe injury Environment * Minimum environmental pollution Goodwill * Reduction of the number of negative publications in the national and international media * Zero tolerance to cases of refusal of an international airline to arrive in the airport as a result of goodwill Here are examples of declarations on risk appetite and the way to turn them into quantitative indicators:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Risk appetite. The main focus of private sector risk management is on maintaining and enhancing profitability. In contrast, the public sector focuses on the fulfilment of objectives and delivery of a beneficial outcome in the public interest. Mintek, as a Schedule 3 Public Entity, is positioned between the private and public sectors. Mintek must adopt well-managed risk taking where it is likely to lead to improvements in service delivery. It is recognised that risk taking is essential if Mintek is to innovate and improve. Mintek’s risk appetite is reflected in our strategic objectives. Our overall portfolio of risks must be balanced to ensure, as far as possible, that the mix of risks remains tolerable.
Risk appetite. Holcim’s risk appetite and evaluation of a customer’s credit worthiness will determine the trading terms & limit under which a customer shall trade within Holcim. The key objective is to convert all sales orders into cash within standard trading terms that require payment to be received by Holcim in full (without any set-off) within the approved credit terms. A Credit facility is offered to facilitate sales, to meet market and customer expectations and provide a competitive advantage to the organization. Risk shall be assessed & controlled by Risk Assessment Matrix & Guidelines for ALL New & Existing Customers: ● An approved Holcim credit limit. ● Market specific terms of trade (days of credit) ● The Holcim Delegation of AuthorityCredit Process ● Holcim Standard Terms & Conditions(and any amendments thereto) as approved Legal Risk shall be mitigated by: ● Professional Credit Management processes through the application of sound commercial customer management processes operating in a Continuous Improvement environment. ● Security via Charging/Caveating of Real Property; PPSR Registrations via PMSI’s (Purchase Monetary Security Interest & ALLPAP’s (All Past & Present Property – No exception) ● Targeted market offer & Business Strategy ● A defined risk escalation process within the business ● Specific Insurance endorsement may be sought across the entire customer’s portfolio or specific business segments if deemed commercially feasible.
Risk appetite. <A risk appetite should be agreed with the SIRO/SRO and included here.>

Related to Risk appetite

  • High Risk Use Npcap is not designed, manufactured, or intended for use in hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance where the failure of the software could lead directly to death, personal injury, or significant physical or environmental damage (“High Risk Activities”). Use of Npcap in High Risk Activities is not authorized.

  • Risk Warning 7.1. The Client unreservedly accepts, acknowledges and understands that CFDs trading: • is highly speculative; • carry a high level of financial risk, as they are subject to excessive price fluctuations which may cause substantial losses; • in the case of CFDs with underlying asset a virtual currency, there might be sudden changes in prices of certain instruments. This can happen during economic events or market announcements or geopolitical events, news, or even due to adverse media or fake news. Gaps can occur when markets open or close or even during normal trading hours. If the market is closed when these factors occur, the opening price of the underlying asset can be substantially different from the closing price, giving you no opportunity to close your trade in-between. Pricing gaps can result in losses. Therefore, CFDs on virtual currencies may be subject to large price fluctuations and in some instances, due to the early stages of their lifecycle, they may lose entire value. • the losses may include all of the Client’s investment and also any additional commissions and other expenses; • is only suitable for persons who are able to cope with the associated risks by bearing the financial losses; • the Company does not guarantee the capital of the Client’s Account or its value at any time or any money invested in any Financial Instrument;

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

  • Scoring The number of routes each company operates (Route # 0001-2999, 8000-8199) will be multiplied by 2 to determine the daily number of trips. (Only accidents, breakdowns and service reports related to routes falling in this range will be used for the evaluation). The daily number of trips will be multiplied by 175 to arrive at the annual number of trips. The number of accidents, breakdowns and service complaints will be divided by the total number of trips to calculate a percent figure. Each company’s percentage will be compared to the total average. See below for a sample. BUS COMPANY NUMBER OF TOTAL BKDN PERCENT ACCIDENTS PERCENT2 SERVICE PERCENT3 ROUTES TRIPS BKDN ACCIDENTS REPORTS COMPLAINTS TO TRIPS TO TRIPS TO TRIPS A 360 58680 3 0.01% 27 0.05% 46 0.08% B 48 7824 3 0.04% 4 0.05% 39 0.50% C 123 20049 11 0.05% 9 0.04% 27 0.13% D 91 14833 0.00% 10 0.07% 11 0.07% E 124 20212 20 0.10% 19 0.09% 18 0.09% TOTALS 746 121598 37 0.03% 69 0.06% 141 0.12% To score, if a company’s percentage is less than or equal to the total percentage for that category, the company will be awarded 6 points per category. Percentages greater than the total percentage for each distinct category (Accident, Breakdown, Service Complaints) will be scored according to the following scale: Vendor Category Percent Points Less than-Equal to Ave. 6 points 0-3% above average 5 points 4-7% above average 4 points 5-8% above average 3 points 9-12% above average 2 points 13-16% 1 points Greater than 17% 0 points Example: Company A had a lower percent of breakdowns than the average total, and would receive 6 points for breakdowns. If a company has a higher percentage than the average total, 0 point will be added to their score. Company B would not receive 6 points for breakdowns. The same calculation would be performed for accidents and service complaints. Any circumstance whereby a Breakdown or Accident is found by PTS to be ‘Non Reported’ by vendor within the required timeframe (see G-36) will count as (20) ‘Reported’ instances for the purpose of this Contractor Evaluation Scoring.

  • Segmentation The purchase of any Products and related Service Offerings or other Service Offerings are all separate offers and separate from any other order for any Products and related Service Offerings or other Service Offerings You may receive or have received from Oracle. You understand that You may purchase any Products and related Service Offerings or other Service Offerings independently of any other Products or Service Offerings. Your obligation to pay for (a) any Products and related Service Offerings is not contingent on performance of any other Service Offerings or delivery of any other Products or (b) other Service Offerings is not contingent on delivery of any Products or performance of any additional/other Service Offerings. You acknowledge that You have entered into the purchase without reliance on any financing or leasing arrangement with Oracle or its affiliate.

  • Highlights WI-HER and RTI collaborated with NTDCP to conduct a GESI Pause and Reflect (P&R) meeting in Arusha from October 17-19, 2022. The meeting brought together the six councils (Ulanga DC, Mlimba DC, Longido DC, Monduli DC, Simanjiro DC and Kiteto DC) where the GESI behavior change activity was implemented in FY22 to document lessons learned and plan for GESI implementation in FY23. The meeting highlighted the importance of health education in addressing barriers to MDA uptake and involving government and traditional community leaders in MDA. Participants also discussed how to integrate GESI lessons learned into the CDD training package and potential activities for CCHPs. • Act | East supported the NTDCP to conduct a preparation meeting for the upcoming CCHP Pause and Reflect meeting in November. The preparation meeting was conducted in Singida from October 21-23, 2022. The technical team involved officers from PORALG, Directorate of Policy and Planning (DPP) office of the MOH, R4D, and WI-HER who collaboratively reviewed the meeting agenda, presentations, and documentation tools. During this preparation meeting, NTDCP and XXXXXX strongly recommended a high-level advocacy following the CCHP P&R meeting. This will be important for more resource mobilization at national and sub-national levels. Upcoming activities requiring COVID protocols: • Act | East will collaborate with NTDCP, DPP office of the MOH, and PORALG to conduct the CCHP P&R meeting from November 15-18 in Dodoma. The meeting will bring together district NTD coordinators and health secretaries from the 15 districts that implemented the CCHP activity in FY22 to gather feedback on the CCHP process, successes, challenges and way forward. • In collaboration with NTDCP and PORALG, Act | East will organize review and planning meetings for the districts and regions conducting trachoma and OV MDAs in FY23. The activity will be conducted in Morogoro from November 7-10, 2022 and will be followed by the training of trainers for trachoma and OV MDAs on November 11th. • Act | East will support the NTDCP to conduct SCH and STH MDA in 41 districts in November 2022. This MDA was postponed from FY22 Q4. • In collaboration with NTDCP, Act | East will conduct an LF disease-specific assessment (DSA) outcome investigation in Pangani DC and Kilwa DC in November. • Act | East Tanzania XXXXX staff will attend the NTD Information System (NIS) training in Mozambique from November 28 – December 3rd. • Act | East will support NTDCP and the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) Tanga lab to conduct analysis of Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples collected in FY22 for OV using OV16 rapid diagnostic tests. COVID-19 data monitoring sources: WHO: xxxxx://xxxxx00.xxx.xxx/region/afro/country/tz October 2022 UGANDA Act | East Partner: RTI, The Xxxxxx Center, WI-HER, R4D, Save the Children Total population: 46,205,893 (2022) COP: [Redacted] Districts: 136 RTI HQ Team: [Redacted] Endemic diseases: LF (66), TRA (41), OV (43), SCH (91), STH (136) TABLE: Activities supported by USAID in FY23 LF OV Trachoma MDA N/A 8/11 districts (R1) 0/11 districts (R2) 0/2 districts (Dec 2022) 0/5 districts (June 2023) DSAs (#EUs) TAS 2: 0/8 EUs TAS 3: 0/3 EUs N/A TSS+: 2 EUs Confirmatory mapping: 2 districts XXXXX Targeted follow-up investigation in two districts of Nabilatuk and Buliisa Data quality assessment (DQA) in Buliisa district HSS High-level meeting on mainstreaming NTD drugs Building domestic resource mobilization capacity workshops National advocacy meeting Finalize and institutionalize GESI MDA training curriculum Finalize integration of GESI into MOH-led social and behavior change packages GESI behavior change activity scale up in two districts. Summary and explanation of changes made to table above since last month: N/A • Table is updated with planned FY23 activities. • OV MDA was completed in 8 districts by TCC. Ebola Update: • On 15 September, an index case of Ebola virus disease (EVD) was identified in Mubende District, Uganda. The Ministry of Health declared an outbreak of Sudan EVD on 20 September. As of 6 November, 135 cases have been confirmed throughout 7 districts. The CoP has weekly update meetings with HQ and HO and is actively monitoring the situation. We are developing SOPs and monitoring closely how the virus evolves within Uganda to be ready to change plans should Ebola be confirmed in our implementing districts. Highlights: RTI • Cross border Joint MDA Review Meeting. Act | East supported the RTI team to attend the Joint MDA review meeting in Kisumu, Kenya from 26–27 October. The objective of the meeting was to review progress and document learnings and gains from the previous joint MDA and to disseminate the MDA results. The meeting was attended by Senior MOH officials from both countries, district officials from border districts, Secretary for Health West Pokot County and partners. Some of the key recommendations were (1) to delay trachoma impact survey in West Pokot for 1 more round of MDA to have a joint impact survey with Uganda to realize intended outcomes; (2) Kenya adopting house to house approach of MDA implementation with VHTs; and

  • Periodic Risk Assessment Provider further acknowledges and agrees to conduct periodic risk assessments and remediate any identified security and privacy vulnerabilities in a timely manner.

  • Risk 16.1 With effect from the date of the Contract of Sale, solely as between the Purchaser and the Bank, the risk relating to the Property shall be that of the Purchaser as regard to loss and/or damage (full or partial) of whatsoever nature or howsoever occurring to the Property.

  • RISK AND TITLE (a) Risk of damage to or loss of Products will pass to Customer (i) upon delivery by Signify to Customer in accordance with the applicable INCOTERM; or (ii) in the event that Signify Installs Products on-site, unless agreed otherwise, upon delivery on-site.

  • Infrastructure Vulnerability Scanning Supplier will scan its internal environments (e.g., servers, network devices, etc.) related to Deliverables monthly and external environments related to Deliverables weekly. Supplier will have a defined process to address any findings but will ensure that any high-risk vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.