Prosecution Sample Clauses

The Prosecution clause outlines the responsibilities and procedures for pursuing and maintaining legal rights, typically in the context of intellectual property such as patents. It specifies which party is responsible for filing, prosecuting, and maintaining applications, as well as handling any related legal actions or communications with authorities. This clause ensures that valuable rights are properly protected and managed, preventing lapses or disputes over who controls the prosecution process.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 4 times
Prosecution. Hospital shall be responsible for the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of all patent applications and patents included in Patent Rights. Company shall reimburse Hospital for Patent Costs incurred by Hospital relating thereto in accordance with Section 4.2.
Prosecution. All violations of proprietary rights or the Agreement will be prosecuted to the fullest extent permissible under applicable law.
Prosecution. Provided that Licensee seeks and maintains the strongest and broadest reasonable patent claims in the best interests of all owners of the Patent Rights and uses patent attorneys acceptable to BIDMC, such acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld, BIDMC appoints Licensee as its agent to prepare, file, prosecute, and maintain all of the Patent Rights during the Term. Licensee shall pay Licensee’s patent counsel directly for any invoiced Patent Costs and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold BIDMC harmless from and against any and all liabilities, damages, costs and expenses incurred by or imposed upon BIDMC in connection with any third party claim arising from the failure of Licensee to timely pay such invoices. Licensee shall instruct patent counsel to provide copies to BIDMC for BIDMC’s administrative files of all invoices detailing Patent Costs which are sent directly to Licensee and inform patent counsel that in no case shall BIDMC be liable for any Patent Costs incurred at the instruction of Licensee. Licensee shall copy BIDMC on all patent prosecution documents and give BIDMC reasonable opportunities to advise Licensee on such filing, prosecution and maintenance. In the event Licensee desires to abandon any patent, patent application, or any patent claims within the Patent Rights, Licensee shall provide BIDMC with reasonable prior written notice of such intended abandonment. If Licensee determines to abandon such patent or patent application without filing a divisional or continuing application directed to similar subject matter, then, at its sole discretion, BIDMC may assume the right to prepare, file, prosecute and maintain the relevant Patent Rights at BIDMC’s expense. In such event, if such abandonment is in the European Union., United States or Japan, such BIDMC paid-for rights shall be removed from the definition of Patent Rights under this Agreement, the licenses granted to Licensee and its Affiliates as to such rights under this Agreement shall terminate, except that, for the avoidance of doubt, Licensee shall retain the rights as set forth in the MTA, and BIDMC shall have the right to abandon or maintain and license its interest in such Patent Rights in its discretion. In the event Licensee (i) fails to maintain any of the Patent Rights and has not complied with the last sentence of the first paragraph of this Section 6.1, or (ii) fails to notify BIDMC of its intent to abandon such Patent Rights, in accordance with this Section, Licensee shall...
Prosecution. Licensor will have the right to control filing, prosecution, and maintenance of the Licensed Patents, including any patents and applications based on Licensor Improvements, at Licensor’s expense. Licensee will have the right to control filing, prosecution, and maintenance of patents and applications based on Licensee Improvements, at Licensee’s expense. The party controlling the filing, prosecution, and maintenance of an invention is referred to herein as the “Prosecuting Party”, while the other party is referred to herein as the “Non-Prosecuting Party”. The Non-Prosecuting Party shall have the right to participate, at its cost and expense, in the filing and prosecution activities of the Prosecuting Party. The Prosecuting Party will notify the Non-Prosecuting Party periodically of the status of any pending cases included in the patents or patent applications licensed to the other party, including any office actions, notice of allowance, and required filings or payments concerning such patents and patent applications. The Non-Prosecuting Party will have the opportunity to comment on any response to office actions or amendments to claims prior to their filing. The Non-Prosecuting Party will have the right to inspect the records kept by the Prosecuting Party and its patent counsel pertaining to the patents and patent applications licensed to the Non-Prosecuting Party. The Non-Prosecuting Party will, at the Prosecuting Party’s request and expense, sign all instruments and documents, including powers of attorney, necessary to effectuate the purpose of this Section 8.1 and provide any other reasonably necessary assistance requested by the Prosecuting Party. If the Prosecuting Party elects to abandon any application or patent licensed to the other party, the Non-Prosecuting Party will have the right to continue prosecution or maintenance of such application or patent at the Non-Prosecuting Party’s sole expense.
Prosecution. Company may (but is not obligated to) prosecute under its sole control any infringement of the Penn Patent Rights at Company’s expense (but with respect to the Assigned BMS Patents, only to the extent that Penn has enforcement rights thereunder as provided in the TDA). For clarity, Company has the first right to enforce the Assigned BMS Patent Rights in the “Exclusive Area,” as such term is defined in the TDA and as applied to the “University” thereunder, notwithstanding the fact that the License under the Assigned BMS
Prosecution. 8.1 The Parties may jointly file a patent application or other applications for the registration of any Intellectual Property Rights in Japan or in any foreign jurisdiction (an “Application”) with respect to any Joint Invention, provided that the Parties have first executed a joint application agreement between the Parties setting forth, among other matters, the content of the application, the application process and the maintenance. 8.2 Notwithstanding Article 8.1, either Party may solely file an Application with respect to the Joint Invention if the other Party agrees, through mutual consultation between the Parties, to assign its right, title and interest in and to such Joint Invention to the filing Party. The assigning Party shall cooperate with the filing Party to ensure the prompt filing of an Application for and prosecution of any such Joint Invention. 8.3 All costs and expenses relating to the filing, prosecution and maintenance, including, but not limited to, patent attorneys’ fees and other expert fees, with respect to any Joint Invention filed jointly by the Parties shall be borne by Company. 8.4 Either Party may solely file an Application with respect to any of its Sole Invention at its sole discretion; provided, however, that the filing Party shall, prior to the filing of the Application, notify the other Party and obtain such other Party’s confirmation that the relevant Sole Invention was in fact conceived solely by the prosecuting Party.
Prosecution. Commencing on the Effective Date, Licensee shall assume, in coordination with CSMC, full responsibility for the application, maintenance, reexamination, reissue, opposition and prosecution of any kind (collectively “Prosecution”) relating to the Patent Rights in the Territory, including, but not limited to, payment of all costs, fees and expenses related thereto. Subject to the approval of CSMC (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), Licensee shall have the right to select counsel with respect to the responsibility assumed by Licensee in this Section 5.1, and Licensee shall diligently pursue the Prosecution of the Patent Rights to the benefit of CSMC. For all purposes of the patent Prosecution, CSMC shall be the named “client” of such patent counsel. Each party shall provide the other with copies of any and all material or communications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or any foreign patent office, and CSMC shall be afforded the opportunity of prior review and comment on such action or paper.
Prosecution. Notwithstanding Article 10 of the Agreement (as amended by Amendment No. 1), LICENSEE shall be entitled, at its sole expense, to assume prosecution of the PATENT APPLICATION and any other United States or foreign patents or patent applications claiming [**], including any continuations, divisionals, and continuations-in-part, and continued prosecution application(s), any reissues, re-examinations, renewals, or extensions, substitutes, and the relevant international equivalents (collectively, the “[**] PATENT(S)”). Any additional patent applications claiming, using, derived from, or arising from [**] or an [**] PATENT shall be an [**] PATENT. Upon request from LICENSEE, YALE will timely transfer to LICENSEE responsibility for prosecution of the [**] PATENTS. All [**] PATENTS shall be prepared, prosecuted, filed and maintained by independent patent counsel chosen by LICENSEE and reasonably acceptable to YALE. Said independent patent counsel shall be ultimately responsible to LICENSEE, but YALE shall also be the client of said patent counsel. YALE shall have the right to retain, at its own expense, separate patent counsel to advise YALE regarding such patent matters. LICENSEE shall instruct patent counsel to keep LICENSEE, YALE and YALE’s patent counsel, if such counsel should be engaged by YALE, fully informed of the progress of all [**] PATENTS, and to give both LICENSEE and YALE reasonable opportunity to comment on the type and scope of useful claims and the nature of supporting disclosures and other matters in the course of patent prosecution and maintenance. In making its decisions regarding patent matters related to [**] PATENTS, LICENSEE shall (a) give due regard to the advice of its patent counsel, (b) instruct its patent counsel to consider any advice offered by YALE and YALE’s patent counsel, if such counsel should be engaged by YALE, and (c) conduct such preparation, prosecution and maintenance of [**] PATENTS in a manner that is commercially reasonable in order to commercialize PRODUCTS IN CLASS and/or LICENSED METHODS for which royalties will be payable by LICENSEE to YALE pursuant to the Agreement. In the event of a disagreement concerning the prosecution of the [**] PATENTS, LICENSEE shall have the right to make the final decision concerning such the prosecution. LICENSEE shall have no liability to YALE for damages, whether direct, indirect or incidental, consequential or otherwise, allegedly arising from its good faith decisions, actions and o...
Prosecution. Tenant shall prosecute such Contest with reasonable diligence and in good faith.
Prosecution. As between the Parties, each Party shall have the sole right (but not the obligation) in its sole discretion (subject to, for Palomar, the MGH Agreement) to prosecute, maintain, enforce and defend any Patents (sub)licensed by such Party to the other Party hereunder, and such other Party shall have no rights with respect to any such activities.