PRICING POLICIES Sample Clauses

PRICING POLICIES. 2.1. The base prices are determined using the current price list for new and extended sales of software modules.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PRICING POLICIES. Purchaser assumes responsibility for any deviation from actual dimensions when providing Seller drawings and/or specifications. Pricing contained in Sellers Proposal is valid for 30 days. Pricing is subject to change without notice. Pricing and Purchase Orders are in US Dollars (USD).
PRICING POLICIES. Licensor shall provide Operator with average menu pricing from Licensor Managed Units. Operator shall use the average menu pricing to determine reasonable, market-competitive pricing for the Operator's menu. As long as all Licensor Managed Units offer complimentary items such as sourdough bread and soft beverage refills as a brand standard, Operator shall be required to follow these standards.
PRICING POLICIES. Manager will propose in connection with the Operating Plan the rate and price schedules for all rooms, products and services provided at the Community.
PRICING POLICIES. A. As previously stated within the Agreement, RDSI reserves the right to reduce charges at any time, however, any increase will not become effective until thirty (30) days, after prior written notice has been given to the Bank. RDSI and the Bank have agreed that during the first (1st) two (2) years of this Agreement, rates shall be fixed at such rates as described in the attached Addendum A - Fee Schedule. Most favored nation provision exists and provides that the Bank's fee schedule are no less favorable than those to any client.
PRICING POLICIES. The pricing of each product is determined based on the agreed price list by the parties enclosed with the Food Ingredients Purchase Agreement with reference to the product cost and market price, and should follow the following pricing principles:
PRICING POLICIES. The transactions under the 2019 Master Agreement shall be conducted on normal commercial terms and at rates that are no less favourable to the Group than rates at which the Connected Clients pay Independent Third Parties for the relevant services. Detailed payment terms will be specified in the individual contracts governing each particular transaction. The Company would consider the following basis to determine the payment terms. Category I Transactions For the provision of services under Category I Transactions to the Connected Clients, the Group will charge underwriting commission as the service fee calculated by a fixed percentage of the amount of securities to be placed or underwritten. The determination of the service fee charged for services under the Category I Transactions will be based on the prevailing market terms and rates for transactions of similar nature. The underwriting commission rate shall be determined through arm’s-length negotiation among the Group, other syndicate underwriters who are Independent Third Parties, and one of the Connected Clients. The underwriting commission rate shall be applicable to the Group and other syndicate underwriters, and may be adjusted by taking into account of the size of the fund-raising exercise and hence its potential return. As such, the Group will be able to ensure that the terms for provision of services under the 2019 Master Agreement will be comparable to the normal commercial terms on the market and no less favourable to the Group than the provision of such services to the other Independent Third Parties. The Group expects, in general, the fee percentage for securities brokerage will be ranging from 0.07% to 0.5% and the fee percentage for placing and underwriting will be ranging from 0.2% to 5%. Category II Transactions For the provision of services under Category II Transactions to the Connected Clients, the Group will charge a fee for each advisory project fixed by reference to the nature, size, complexity and resources involved of each particular project. The determination of the fees charged for services under Category II Transactions will be based on the price range charged for similar services by the Group to existing Independent Third Parties clients, taking into account of (i) the urgency of the proposed transaction or project; (ii) the resources estimated to be utilized in providing the relevant services; (iii) the size and complexity of the proposed transaction or project; (iv) the fee...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
PRICING POLICIES. Parties to the Procurement Agreement will agree from time to time a price list (the “Price List”) setting out the price, specifications and delivery schedule in respect of each type of polyurethane foams, upon which the Purchase Orders must adhere to. The price of each type of polyurethane foams specified in the Price List will be determined with reference to (i) the prevailing market price of such product and (ii) the price of such product supplied by Haining Sinomax to independent third parties. If there is no market price available for a particular product, the price of such product will be determined on a cost-plus basis with reference to the cost incurred by Haining Sinomax for the supply of such product (including all costs and expenses relating to raw material procurement, production, transportation, marketing, operation and management). Payment term Each Purchaser shall pay the purchase price of products supplied by Haining Sinomax by the end of the month subsequent to the delivery of such products. Historical transaction amounts As disclosed in the Prospectus, Haining Sinomax was established in the PRC on 27 December 2012. Prior to its establishment, the Group sold polyurethane foams to Gu Jia Household and Zhejiang Gu Xxx Xxxxx and Sofa Production Co., Ltd* (浙江顧家工藝沙發製造有限公司) (“Gu Xxx Xxxxx”), a fellow subsidiary of Gu Jia Household, through Sinomax Kuka, which is the sole shareholder of Haining Sinomax. For the years ended 31 December 2011 and 2012, the aggregate consideration paid by Gu Jia Household and Gu Xxx Xxxxx to Sinomax Kuka for the purchase of polyurethane foams and the aggregate quantity of such purchase are as follows: Year ended 31 December Consideration paid Quantity RMB million million kg (HK$ million) 2011 108.73 5.87 (135.91) 2012 101.99 5.76 (127.49) For the years ended 31 December 2013 and 2014, the aggregate consideration paid by Gu Jia Household to Sinomax Kuka and Haining Sinomax for the purchase of polyurethane foams and the aggregate quantity of such purchase are as follows: Year ended 31 December Consideration paid Quantity RMB million million kg (HK$ million) 2013 107.76 6.36 (134.70) 2014 108.94 6.40 (136.18) Annual Cap and basis of determination The Annual Cap for the amount of purchases (excluding all applicable tax) payable by the Purchasers to Haining Sinomax under the Procurement Agreement for the year ending 31 December 2015 is RMB154 million (equivalent to approximately HK$192.5 million). The Annual Cap is determi...
PRICING POLICIES. The Group conducts public tender for each of the projects that needs design, construction management and general contracting services. Interested bidders will be selected on the basis of the proposed prices, the achievable technical specifications, the business model and background of the bidders, the proposed payment terms, the estimated delivery dates and the best overall terms offered by the bidders for the awarded project. As such, the fees to be charged by Xuyang Holding Group for the services provided under the project services framework agreement shall be in line with the prices offered by Xuyang Holding Group in its bids, and the Group will compare such bids with those submitted by other independent third parties. As the provision of the Project Services is conducted by way of public tender in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations, the Company considers that such mechanism and procedures can ensure that the Project Services are entered into on normal commercial terms and do not prejudice the interests of the Company and its shareholders as a whole.
PRICING POLICIES. MBf acts as a principal and as such sells and buys from clients on it’s own behalf. it is not an exchange. MBf quotes a selling price (asked price) and a price at which it will buy (bid price). These prices are established by MBf upon it’s analysis of commodities and may change many times during the day. MBf’s bid and asked prices are not necessarily tied to prices quoted by any other organization. MBf reserves the right to change it’s prices and spread between bid and asked prices prospectively at any time.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.